Wasps going into admin & the impact on CCFC (4 Viewers)

Status
Not open for further replies.

Philosoraptor

Well-Known Member
ACL didn't file intention of administration until about a week or so later, so assume they won't enter admin today.

There are two separate ACL companies.

Need to differentiate between them and what each one of them contains and does.

Again, far more knowledgable people than me are tuned into this on the thread that can give an answer.
 

Philosoraptor

Well-Known Member
I think it may be safe to say that communication has totally broken down between a few parties.
 

chiefdave

Well-Known Member
I mean this could backfire a little here. We need ACL running at least up until the World Cup
Don't the terms of the lease mean that the council can take the lease back and, at least temporarily, take over running ACL.

Loaning money and the company still being in the control of Wasps should be off the table.
 

HuckerbyDublinWhelan

Well-Known Member
Don't the terms of the lease mean that the council can take the lease back and, at least temporarily, take over running ACL.

Loaning money and the company still being in the control of Wasps should be off the table.
I don’t see why they just don’t let ACL go bust then the stadium is not encumbered.

becomes far more saleable
 

hill83

Well-Known Member
giphy.gif
 

skyblu3sk

Well-Known Member
Surely there should be legal/criminal proceedings against Wasps board members if they've continued taking money to spend on a failing business? Is it not classed as fraud?
I imagine this would be a difficult one to prove. Many many companies are loss making for a number of years when they are created. If you have lines of credit and a business plan you could so seen as a going concern. They will point to the fact HSBC nearly leant them money etc.
 

skybluetony176

Well-Known Member
I imagine this would be a difficult one to prove. Many many companies are loss making for a number of years when they are created. If you have lines of credit and a business plan you could so seen as a going concern. They will point to the fact HSBC nearly leant them money etc.

The transfer of ownership of the training ground is dodgy as… looks like asset stripping ahead of liquidation which as far as I understand is highly illegal.

Unless of course full market value was paid in exchange.
 

oldfiver

Well-Known Member
The transfer of ownership of the training ground is dodgy as… looks like asset stripping ahead of liquidation which as far as I understand is highly illegal.

Unless of course full market value was paid in exchange.

As has been repeatedly said - the training ground was never owned by Wasps Holdings.
 

Skyblue_CP

Well-Known Member
Think some of us are getting ahead of ourselves here. Do we know Ashley is even in for the club? Somehow in all of this we are going to end up at St Andrews, I just know it lol.
 

skyblu3sk

Well-Known Member
The transfer of ownership of the training ground is dodgy as… looks like asset stripping ahead of liquidation which as far as I understand is highly illegal.

Unless of course full market value was paid in exchange.
Hmmm unless it was purchased with a loan from the director that they have defaulted on so therefore the asset transfers? Not sure how else they could do it.
 

skyblu3sk

Well-Known Member
Why can't people just be honest and decent when their businesses are failing or am I being a c*ck?
Depends it they are failing, it can sometimes be cash flow issues etc. In this case I do think it's a failing business but the directors will be bought in to the project and may have truly believed they could turn it around with time.
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
I imagine this would be a difficult one to prove. Many many companies are loss making for a number of years when they are created. If you have lines of credit and a business plan you could so seen as a going concern. They will point to the fact HSBC nearly leant them money etc.

They have been taking bookings and incurring man costs - Richardson publicly declared they were not entering administration a few weeks ago - all the indicators point one way and the funding - even it was ever really there - would not have covered all the increasing number of creditors
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
The transfer of ownership of the training ground is dodgy as… looks like asset stripping ahead of liquidation which as far as I understand is highly illegal.

Unless of course full market value was paid in exchange.

It never owned the training ground - they will have been a supply and rental arrangement
 

dadgad

Well-Known Member
In fairness there are two BBCs really, the national news which is full of pro Tory editors and broadcasters and the local which still fulfils the public service remit.

Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk
Yes, you could say that ‘local’ news plays lip service to the actual needs of society while the big hitters in London shore things up for the establishment. 1666010361732.png
 

CCFCSteve

Well-Known Member
They have been taking bookings and incurring man costs - Richardson publicly declared they were not entering administration a few weeks ago - all the indicators point one way and the funding - even it was ever really there - would not have covered all the increasing number of creditors

If they were still actively exploring potential options/solutions/sale it’s unlikely the directors will be pulled up for continuing the past few weeks and months

I look back further though…was it ever truly viable ?!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Top