Wasps going into admin & the impact on CCFC (129 Viewers)

Status
Not open for further replies.

Sky Blue Harry H

Well-Known Member
If anyone's sad enough to want to watch the council meeting... believe its at 2. Pre drink at 1 in preparation


Sent from my SM-G991B using Tapatalk

Think I'll wait for the summary, plus I think my other half has got me booked for hedge trimming duties ☹
 

hill83

Well-Known Member
The club is CANCELLED



brent-david.gif
 

duffer

Well-Known Member
The most likely solution is that following administration the stadium/long lease is sold* and bondholders get Xp in the pound (as I can’t see it selling for more than £35m and that’s before any professional fees). At that point the stadium will be free from any debts/liabilities…unless new owner has borrowed against it

*there might be a period of trading I guess and that’s what CCC might have to help fund. If so, they’d receive repayment of this before bondholders receive their distribution

I'm not sure how this would work. There's a strict order of creditors, and even HMRC sit behind the bondholders. There's no obvious way that I can see of CCC jumping to the front if they loan ACL funds now or when in admin. If any subsequent deal unspooled it'd be a risk to council funds, surely?
 

Kneeza

Well-Known Member
Fair enough Streets just a prick then. Did they turn pro recently? Sure they were semi pro not long back

Sent from my SM-G991B using Tapatalk
It's a few years now since they returned to fully-pro status (having had a period as such before, before going semi-pro).
The difference between CRFC and Wasps though, is that they do it realistically, within budgetary constraints as far as possible, and the players also have other 'jobs' within the club, such as community development roles at schools and so on.
 

Nick

Administrator
So if it does work out as £175k a week lost, how were they ever going to be able to pay the bonds back? They would have needed a HUGE turnaround.
 

CCFCSteve

Well-Known Member
I'm not sure how this would work. There's a strict order of creditors, and even HMRC sit behind the bondholders. There's no obvious way that I can see of CCC jumping to the front if they loan ACL funds now or when in admin. If any subsequent deal unspooled it'd be a risk to council funds, surely?

You’re right if CCC provided any funding now they’re unlikely to get it back. For any funding provided post administration to help trading they would as it would be a cost of the administration which would sit above creditors. I’d imagine the bondholders trustee/representative would be brought in the loop on this. Ultimately its in their best interests as it would keep the stadium operational whilst a buyers found, hopefully achieving a better price…rather than a rushed fire sale price which could happen if it closed

It might be that there’s no funding necessary but I was just saying if CCC/someone needs to fund trading while a sale process is completed, they’d be repaid the cash. Hopefully this should mean the doors stay open 🤞
 

skybluetony176

Well-Known Member
Does that figure take into account the secondary spend? A wholistic assessment of ccfc occupancy would be more accurate, rather than a single cost centre.
Also the footfall to the Arena’s other tenants. That surely has to be measured as value to the arena. I’m sure the casino for instance is happy CCFC came back.
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
Does that figure take into account the secondary spend? A wholistic assessment of ccfc occupancy would be more accurate, rather than a single cost centre.

The basic point is that the group accounted revenue is around £25m - you would assume a buyer would intend to maximise revenue and target of £30m is not unreasonable

Our direct contribution really is rent and also whatever the split on F and B. It is going to be small

Wasps themselves show average F and B is at £6 per head - cannot see ours as much tbh certainly no more.

So unless someone is buying the club as well they will not really be buying it because we are they - just will see us as an added assured revenue
 

Paul Anthony

Well-Known Member
Wasps Director blames RFU? ha


The lack of accountability is quite amazing. Seems so far they've blamed just about everyone else before themselves.
 

Nick

Administrator

"As long as though they are getting their interest paid, which they are, and they have proper security for the bond which is in the context of this place and also the P shares, as they call it, they've got more than enough cover.

"We've not had virtually no contact from bond holders because as long as they get their interest paid and let their money back at the end of the bond, what the profits are, are not necessarily of primary concern for them."
 

TomRad85

Well-Known Member
Who's this fucking fanny?

There's a few on Facebook and Twitter by the looks giving the faux sadness over the redundancies. It's not ideal for them obviously but people get made redundant every day, people who don't work for parasites and I absolutely will not have my enjoyment over Wasps going pop being spoiled by a few social media suck ups.

Sent from my SM-G973F using Tapatalk
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Top