TomRad85
Well-Known Member
Heard anything else?Weird there's been nothing on statements yet
Heard anything else?Weird there's been nothing on statements yet
If SISU had done that it would be a disgrace.Still see the ex CCFC fans who are now massive Wasps fans saying the same things.
They laud Wasps for loading ACL up with debt but still say SISU would have just tried to steal everything.
If that was the case - they’d have ducked out in 2014. Their exit is tied with them getting their money back - the only way they get that money back is selling a football club with assets
rhis was the exact conversation then
If SISU had done that it would be a disgrace.
Feels like something is brewing and contracts are being drafted.
They’ve spent roughly 30m they want that back.Not if they, like everyone on here, thought Wasps wasn’t sustainable.
I mean I’ve never seen what they’re holding on for but could kinda understand the arena.
You said “not sure” - it’s a definite no on NEC. I don’t want SISU, but if they get hold of the Ricoh - there’s an exit for them. If the NEC take over we’re stuck with them forever.
SISU - Our owners will always be more preferable than the NEC owning the arena
I considered the Keith ONeil recovery room or the Ameobi relaxing roomTim Sherwood Wellness Room.
They’ve spent roughly 30m they want that back.
they have a charge on the training ground. They’ll just hang around like a bad smell taking management fees and cutting costs. Then write it off as a tax loss
No, of the four choices linked if I had to chose one it would be Dawkins and his American contacts and keep my fingers crossed.Are you seriously suggesting that the owners of the club also owning the stadium would be bad for CCFC? Not with you.
If you want SISU here for the foreseeable, NEC ownership pretty much guarantees that.
If it was the yanks any chance Robins has met them?
Is the debt within the club and the subsequent split between the two a guide to the offer for the stadium?They’ve spent roughly 30m they want that back.
they have a charge on the training ground. They’ll just hang around like a bad smell taking management fees and cutting costs. Then write it off as a tax loss
By far the worst case secenario in my view is a 3rd party getting hold of the lease.
A group like NEC may make the stadium side profitable again but CCFC would see little benifit. as tennants Sisu would be more dangerous if they felt their oppertunity to cash out had diminished.
Nobody has invested in the last 8 years - what makes you think someone will invest in the club It they were still separated from the stadium?Why wouldn’t they do that with the stadium?
Maybe I just don’t see it as as key to our fortunes as some.
I think weirdly the best outcome might be Sisu sticking around in the background with new investment if no one buys the club along with the stadium.
Nobody has invested in the last 8 years - what makes you think someone will invest in the club It they were still separated from the stadium?
ultimately it depends on what you think SISU are here for. I think they want their money back. I don’t think they intended to be here for 15 years
No idea - I’m just quoting a figure I’m sure old sky blue had stated when going through the accounts - more than happy to be corrected thoughIs the debt within the club and the subsequent split between the two a guide to the offer for the stadium?
Well that’s 2nd best option. SISU is third - my dispute was they would infinitely be better than NECYou misunderstand. I mean SaddleBrains’ rumour where someone buys the ground in exchange for 51% while Sisu retain 49%.
the NEC are yanks
You misunderstand. I mean SaddleBrains’ rumour where someone buys the ground in exchange for 51% while Sisu retain 49%.
I think the possibility of Sisu getting their money back is long gone. It’ll take more than Joys current life expectancy at current rates.
Very clever!!Guillaume’s Boozy Lane (pub lined street built outside the ground)
Well that’s 2nd best option. SISU is third - my dispute was they would infinitely be better than NEC
the best option is a clean break whether it’s Dawkins not bullshitting or even Ashley
I finally get to catch up on here and all there is are silly made up business names based on the names of players.
Didn't wasps just open a new club shop at the stadium or am I imagining that
Toilets to be renamed Stern "John's"I finally get to catch up on here and all there is are silly made up business names based on the names of players.
Well that’s what it comes down to doesn’t it - how Badly do you want SISU goneMaybe I’ve got Stockholm syndrome here, but I’d want any new owner to keep the club running as it is, just properly funded (if I’m being picky) Dawkins May well do that, I doubt Ashley would. Problem is Dawkins gives of distinct chancer vibes.
I think it's gallows humour/tension in us all with no news.I finally get to catch up on here and all there is are silly made up business names based on the names of players.