SkyBlue_Bear83
Well-Known Member
I was only on about this seasonThorn was tolerated for 60 games. The board last year had no teeth. Any other club would have sacked someone after a 13 point haul at the halfway stage.
It wasn't a defence of Thorn before you shit your panties and jump on me, it was a criticism of the board. It didn't make sense to sack him so quickly and then leave someone else in charge for 5+ games whilst he is doing a worse job. They might as well have left Thorn in charge an gone behind his back for a new appointment to make an immediate replacement
I agree, I would have had no problem if Thorn was sacked at Christmas as we were awful up to that point