Eviction notice (47 Viewers)

[Sky Blue Pete]

Everyone is assuming Ashley / Fraser group is the offending party here. How do we know SISU aren’t playing silly buggers?

Just sick of all this nonsense.

Worth askin but simply lease in place has been thrown out.

 

---

[Briles]

Nothing on babestation

Less c*nts on there than amongst this shit show

 

[Brighton Sky Blue]

So it went from ‘we look forward to working with Coventry City’ to ‘fuck off out the ground’ in how long?

 

[stay_up_skyblues]

Ah must be Monday.

Immediately switched on CWR for the inevitable wall to wall, forensic level coverage. They’re taking about the bloke who wrote the song to the Snowman.

 

[SkyBlue_Bear83]

Errrrrmmmm what?

 

[Sky Blue Pete]

why? sisu are at fault here for not signing new agreement. Should be sisu clarifying why they haven’t signed and more so their intent to sign

How ???

 

[Alkhen]

That’s assuming he actually wants the club.

oh come on man, what the fuck else is he buying the stadium for?! blatantly wanted the club on the cheap. not going his way so he is destabilizing the current owners. every single one of them are shamful cunts

 

[chiefdave]

why? sisu are at fault here for not signing new agreement. Should be sisu clarifying why they haven’t signed and more so their intent to sign

at the very least you would do it as basic PR. if Frasers aren't in they wrong here why would they let their brand be trashed on a national level, this is quickly gaining traction with the likes of Sky News, MOTD, Linekar etc.

if they aren't in the wrong would take them a matter of seconds to set the record straight

lets be honest here you don't issue an eviction notice because you're waiting on some paperwork being signed to continue a deal on existing terms

 

[jordan210]

this went well

 

[SW-Sky Blues]

My concerns about Mike Ashley have come true. I'm devastated.

Just listened to Simon Jordan on Talksport, his comments about the council having deals and permissions in place is interesting. I think a lot of us are guilty of laughing off his previous comments.

 

[theferret]

why? sisu are at fault here for not signing new agreement. Should be sisu clarifying why they haven’t signed and more so their intent to sign

What? They may, and possibly are correct here, argue that no new agreement is necessary. Even if it is, it could be worked out without all the grandstanding. Telling club staff to clear out their stuff and hand in security badges? Fucking hell, you're defending that?

 

[Nick]

My concerns about Mike Ashley have come true. I'm devastated.

Just listened to Simon Jordan on Talksport, his comments about the council having deals and permissions in place is interesting. I think a lot of us are guilty of laughing off his previous comments.

What was he saying?

 

[MAFF]

im surprised frasers and the club haven't said anything yet...

 

[Sky Blue Pete]

at the very least you would do it as basic PR. if Frasers aren't in they wrong here why would they let their brand be trashed on a national level, this is quickly gaining traction with the likes of Sky News, MOTD, Linekar etc.

if they aren't in the wrong would take them a matter of seconds to set the record straight

lets be honest here you don't issue an eviction notice because you're waiting on some paperwork being signed to continue a deal on existing terms

Yep it’s hardball

 

[SBAndy]

Should be a covenant in the lease at a minimum

License not Lease. Didn’t spot that previously. We’re in trouble.

 

[hill83]

I’ll ask again. Who put the statement out?
Or is this a result of some investigative journalism?

 

[chiefdave]

If, as GIMOC suggests, there is a new deal on offer which is the same terms as the existing deal in place why is there even any need for a new deal. The company the deal was made with still exists doesn't it, why would the current deal not be valid?

 

[SW-Sky Blues]

Everyone is assuming Ashley / Fraser group is the offending party here. How do we know SISU aren’t playing silly buggers?

Just sick of all this nonsense.

We don't know. They could have refused to pay the rent so therefore Ashley would be completely in the right to evict us.

 

[Nick]

So the lease must have been transferred to a new company from ACL 2006 (with the new name)? The council must have signed this off?

If the lease hasn't been moved, there is no need for a new deal as it's still with them.

 

[Senior Vick from Alicante]

We all suspected King was a ploy by Sisu to drive up the price of the club, so Ashley has responded. This is a game of business chess based on ownership of the club between a billionaire and a hedge fund with no money. Sisu are out of their league in this one but I would suspect that we will still play at the Ricoh against Swansea. Whoever is involved will have been negotiating over the weekend to sort the situation.

 

[Sky Blue Pete]

If, as GIMOC suggests, there is a new deal on offer which is the same terms as the existing deal in place why is there even any need for a new deal. The company the deal was made with still exists doesn't it, why would the current deal not be valid?

That’s how I see it

 

[GIMOC]

You said on the other thread he was doing it because they tried that last minute thing before the court case?

yes. Sisu playing silly buggers with the court case and not signing the new agreement. so handing the notice in to kick them up the arse.

 

[ms639]

This is 100% the councils fault, there should have been terms in the agreement that any sale of the ground was contingent on the football club being able to play there. Simply put, they don't give a fuck

 

[torchomatic]

So the lease must have been transferred to a new company from ACL 2006 (with the new name)? The council must have signed this off?

If the lease hasn't been moved, there is no need for a new deal as it's still with them.

Wasn't it ACL Astute or something like that?

 

[hamil99]

If I’m Robins I’m snapping QPR’s hand off for that job.

I thought MR to QPR was a none starter as recently as last night. Now it seems the obvious choice for him

 

[Hutch11]

The Fraser group have said
"We're all doomed"

 

[Sky Blue Pete]

yes. Sisu playing silly buggers with the court case and not signing the new agreement. so handing the notice in to kick them up the arse.

They look like dicks though

 

[Rosco19]

Mike Ashley wants your club its an attractive deal for him and he will pump some cash in trying to get promotion in the next year or two also he can plaster the stadium with free SD advertising.

 

[clint van damme]

yes. Sisu playing silly buggers with the court case and not signing the new agreement. so handing the notice in to kick them up the arse.

Let's hope that's all it is and they get it signed sharpish then

 

[chiefdave]

yes. Sisu playing silly buggers with the court case and not signing the new agreement. so handing the notice in to kick them up the arse.

how do you class the club putting in a bid to own the stadium they play in as 'playing silly buggers'. they were perfectly entitled to put a bid in, in fact most people have been urging them to do that for years

 

[SW-Sky Blues]

What was he saying?

Along the lines of the council have done deals behind the scenes and put permissions in place to move the club out and develop the site for residential properties.

The council were willing to help rehome the football club or something.

In the short term he believes this is a negotiating tactic by Ashley and it will be sorted by the next home game.

 

[chiefdave]

They look like dicks though

exactly this. if you want to take the club over threatening to evict the club is hardly the way to get the fans onside.

 

[HuckerbyDublinWhelan]

Mike Ashley wants your club its an attractive deal for him and he will pump some cash in trying to get promotion in the next year or two also he can plaster the stadium with free SD advertising.

That’s a dream scenario at the moment. The CBS Arena doesn’t have the same hold as St James Park - Sports direct arena wouldn’t bother us

 

[GIMOC]

If, as GIMOC suggests, there is a new deal on offer which is the same terms as the existing deal in place why is there even any need for a new deal. The company the deal was made with still exists doesn't it, why would the current deal not be valid?

because the current deal is with wasps. New deal is with Fraser group. So contracts need to be signed. What part of that can’t you grasp?

 

[skyblu3sk]

I wonder if Sisu have said we paid for the pitch therefore we aren't paying our lease. MA has said that company has gone in to administration talk the the administrators and pay the lease...