Public Enquiry into Sale to Wasps (2 Viewers)

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
In which case he should surely know a lot of dirt he could spill if he wanted to ;)

If he had anything it would certainly benefit him to release it, like any non-Labour councillor. Same with the KovBlog/Piggy guy, always a red flag to me when it’s vague accusations and little proof.
 
D

Deleted member 5849

Guest
I mean he’s a councillor, he can rock up to records and dig himself, talk to staff, etc. And if he finds something/gets blocked/finds a massive hole in the records, go public with it.
I don't disagree, and still think it's lazy politics, but it's harder to throw that mud at him if he wasn't about to be part of that unanimous decision.
 

Northants Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
Im all for a pile-on but this Gary Ridley?


"A joint statement from George Duggins, leader of Coventry City Council and Gary Ridley, leader of the opposition Conservative Party, issued this afternoon, states: “We are naturally disappointed that the Court of Appeal has granted permission to appeal the decision made on 14 July 2017.

“However, we remain confident that we have a robust defence to all the claims, and that the decisions the Council took on 7 October 2014 were entirely lawful."
 

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
Im all for a pile-on but this Gary Ridley?


"A joint statement from George Duggins, leader of Coventry City Council and Gary Ridley, leader of the opposition Conservative Party, issued this afternoon, states: “We are naturally disappointed that the Court of Appeal has granted permission to appeal the decision made on 14 July 2017.

“However, we remain confident that we have a robust defence to all the claims, and that the decisions the Council took on 7 October 2014 were entirely lawful."
Indeed, opportunist Tory wanker
 
D

Deleted member 5849

Guest
Im all for a pile-on but this Gary Ridley?


"A joint statement from George Duggins, leader of Coventry City Council and Gary Ridley, leader of the opposition Conservative Party, issued this afternoon, states: “We are naturally disappointed that the Court of Appeal has granted permission to appeal the decision made on 14 July 2017.

“However, we remain confident that we have a robust defence to all the claims, and that the decisions the Council took on 7 October 2014 were entirely lawful."
Thankyou. That's the mud I was grasping for.
 

skybluetony176

Well-Known Member
There’s clearly grounds for an enquiry for the proposed bailout and denials about that bailout. Enquiry into the initial sale of ACL to Wasp’s? What’s it going to say? In selling to Wasps CCC we’re then subsequently able to recover £14m (IIRC) in debt owed to the tax payers. Not exactly damming. We all have our opinion on how it wasn’t good for the club but the fact is we live in a free market economy, anyone was allowed to purchase ACL and CCC were allowed to sell it. The fact that they offloaded it for a couple of million, got more money for a lease extension and then had a tax payer debt paid in full to boot doesn’t exactly say an enquiry is needed.

What’s happened in the last few months with false statements. 100% needs an enquiry.
 

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
There’s clearly grounds for an enquiry for the proposed bailout and denials about that bailout. Enquiry into the initial sale of ACL to Wasp’s? What’s it going to say? In selling to Wasps CCC we’re then subsequently able to recover £14m (IIRC) in debt owed to the tax payers. Not exactly damming. We all have our opinion on how it wasn’t good for the club but the fact is we live in a free market economy, anyone was allowed to purchase ACL and CCC were allowed to sell it. The fact that they offloaded it for a couple of million, got more money for a lease extension and then had a tax payer debt paid in full to boot doesn’t exactly say an enquiry is needed.

What’s happened in the last few months with false statements. 100% needs an enquiry.

Why? No bailout happened so it's irrelevant now, it didn't even get to the point of being voted on. I'm not defending the council here it's just a complete waste of time.
 

Mcbean

Well-Known Member
Listened to Duggins on cwr last night , he was in full sidestep mode when adudu asked whether the council had any culpability - they sound so dodgy all of them but rest assure they are looking after the Coventry taxpayers money not 🤣
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
There’s clearly grounds for an enquiry for the proposed bailout and denials about that bailout. Enquiry into the initial sale of ACL to Wasp’s? What’s it going to say? In selling to Wasps CCC we’re then subsequently able to recover £14m (IIRC) in debt owed to the tax payers. Not exactly damming. We all have our opinion on how it wasn’t good for the club but the fact is we live in a free market economy, anyone was allowed to purchase ACL and CCC were allowed to sell it. The fact that they offloaded it for a couple of million, got more money for a lease extension and then had a tax payer debt paid in full to boot doesn’t exactly say an enquiry is needed.

What’s happened in the last few months with false statements. 100% needs an enquiry.

The £14 million debt was purchased by the council on the claim it would with interest payments a profit to the taxpayer
 

duffer

Well-Known Member
I can't help but feel that there are a lot of people missing a key point here:

There is a world of difference between lawful behaviour, and ethical behaviour.

There are set standards for the behaviour expected of local councillors, the Nolan Principles.

The judicial review did not consider whether these principles were broken, only whether the council acted unlawfully.

Similarly, the fact that £30m bailout didn't go through, does not mean in itself that those involved acted properly.

I've linked to the Nolan Principles below. Could anyone here confidently say that the council has followed these principles given the way they've acted in these matters?

I'm pretty sure I could make an argument that they've broken the lot of them!

Yes, I'd like a genuinely independent enquiry, not the Council marking it's own homework with an "ethics committee" report. If we don't scrutinise and hold our elected officials to proper standards, then I guess we get what we deserve.

 

Nick

Administrator


Now we know the full extent of how many local businesses were fucked over. Pretty sure heads need to roll.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top