clint van damme
Well-Known Member
Now your being silly
Now your being silly
Nick
Administrator
Oh the way you are going on I thought it was 50% plus? With your pathetic "MET Police: Not so bad are they" type nonsense.
Of course it is wrong, any person in the job found to be guilty of any crime should receive a much heavier sentence and happily would just use a bullet for the recent one. It is nowhere near enough a high enough percentage to group them all together.
Reminds me of Tommy Robinson going on about grooming gangs and those bloody Muslims all touching kids.
clint van damme
Well-Known Member
Yes it is, and we're only seeing the figures for sex crimes.
Imagine what the overall figure is.
skybluetony176
Well-Known Member
Yes. Compare it to another profession, any profession, let alone a profession where your job is to uphold the law. Let’s remember that the figures (that also seemed to have gone up overnight from what was being said just yesterday) in regards to the Met are specifically to sexual and domestic abuse. They don’t include other acts of violence, corruption or involvement in other types of crime. The statistics are gobsmacking only made worse when you consider what their profession is.
Nick
Administrator
You’ve gone from “hang the rapists” to “1000 claims of sexual assault isn’t THAT bad” in less than 24 hours, it’s honestly a little awe-inspiring to see one man’s brain become so completely broken by the internet.
Nick
Administrator
Where can you find the stats to find crimes based on occupation?
I have said throughout, the punishment should be much, much steeper for somebody in a position of power taking advantage of it for crime.
clint van damme
Well-Known Member
It is high. If you ring the MET to report something you've got a less than 1 in 50 chance of a wrong un turning up at your door.
skybluetony176
Well-Known Member
clint van damme
Well-Known Member
It's nothing to do with Tommy Robinson, the METs own figures paint an horrendous picture, and I think that's just the tip of the iceberg but that's just my opinion.
Quiet everyone! The guy who likes to post about gypsies and Romanian beggar women is here with an important lesson about discrimination.
David O'Day
Well-Known Member
other professions may see someone called "bastard dave" as a red flag and not someone you'd give a gun to
Sick Boy
Super Moderator
They really should have watched Max & Paddy.
Can you give me an example of how changing a couple of my words makes me look “full on Tommy Robinson”? Bonus points if you can avoid it resembling one of your old posts about minorities in the process.
clint van damme
Well-Known Member
The MET are taking this that seriously that a) it was another force who caught him after a victim went to them because she thought the MET were useless.
B) as of this morning he was still in the MET.
Nick
Administrator
How the hell is he still in the MET? Is there some shit process where they have to go through to fuck him off?
Isn't being a rapist enough for somebody to instantly get rid?
skybluetony176
Well-Known Member
You can look at rates for the population as a whole. It’s far less than the Met in isolation. For instance there was a reported 850000 domestic abuse claims and 773000 sexual abuse claims in 2020 in England and Wales from a population of over 59M people. The Met is bucking the general trend by about 30%. That’s also before you factor in that domestic abuse especially but also sexual abuse skyrocketed in 2020 during the lockdowns. So in normal times the rate will be higher again. It’s also pretty clear that the Met specifically has circled the wagon around at least 2 officers and protected them from normal scrutiny so had they worked in any other profession would have been locked up long ago and many women wouldn’t be victims and at least one would still be alive.
clint van damme
Well-Known Member
Proceedings starting today, this came to light in December.
“2% of grooming gang members being accused of sexual assault is a worrying number”
— Tommy Robinson
Nick
Administrator
Not even suspended? wow.
clint van damme
Well-Known Member
Think they stopped paying him
Sky Blue Pete
Well-Known Member
Slippery slope dehumanising individuals
Grendel
Well-Known Member
He does not appear to have demonstrated too many traits I would associate as human.
Shall we let him have free TV and B and B for the rest of his life - or perhaps let him out at some point as a reformed character
Sky Blue Pete
Well-Known Member
Not saying anything other than it’s a slippery slope to dehumanise. Given his crimes he will get a long sentence but is likely to be up for parole before he dies. Thems just the facts
Bugsy
Well-Known Member
that's exactly what he has done to his victims Pete, that's what needs to be done to these kind of criminals, they dehumanising therefore they need to be dehumanised
Sky Blue Pete
Well-Known Member
He has
We don’t have to it’s a choice and it’s a bad one looking through history
Whatever standard of care he’ll be getting in prison (I personally doubt any B&B offering a similar service would get very high ratings) he certainly won’t be getting it for “free”.
David O'Day
Well-Known Member
West Yorkshire Police officer charged with sexual assault
PC Lee Parker is also accused of outraging public decency, West Yorkshire Police says.
www.bbc.co.uk
Sky Blue Pete
Well-Known Member
OopsWest Yorkshire Police officer charged with sexual assault
PC Lee Parker is also accused of outraging public decency, West Yorkshire Police says.www.bbc.co.uk
Earlsdon_Skyblue1
Well-Known Member
I don't think it necessarily needs to be an anti-police thread, because it goes without saying that many of them do a really amazing job. That being said, the numbers we are seeing here are really worrying, it's really high isn't it? As for this bloke, should never be allowed to walk to streets again. It is bad enough as it is, but to be in a position of trust like that and behave in this way over and over again - it's absolutely sickening.
Not sure if he will get protection in prison or if he'll get thrown to the wolves, but he certainly doesn't deserve the former.
Not sure if he will get protection in prison or if he'll get thrown to the wolves, but he certainly doesn't deserve the former.
skybluetony176
Well-Known Member
He’ll probably be with other sex offenders so unlikely to mix with non sex offenders. Tends to be deliberate in prison to do that as it’s easier than putting them with other prisoners who like to have a go at sex offenders. So unless there’s an incarcerated sex offender who has a particular hatred for police officers it’s unlikely. Most sex offenders tend to keep themselves to themselves and their heads down in prison and generally are very little trouble.
Sky Blue Pete
Well-Known Member
Correct