Do you want to discuss boring politics? (62 Viewers)

chiefdave

Well-Known Member
Fucking hell, even by the incredibly low standards of this government this is shocking. Should lead to resignations but that doesn't seem to be a thing anymore
It has also emerged that the Home Office was warned repeatedly by police that the vulnerable occupants of the hotel – asylum-seeking children who had recently arrived in the UK without parents or carers – would be targeted by criminal networks.
 

duffer

Well-Known Member

This has been the Tories' plan forever. Underfund the NHS until it's at breaking point and then present privatisation as the only alternative.

Who benefits? Themselves, their rich mates, and their corporate lobbyists and donors.

Who loses? Everyone else, but especially the poorest and most vulnerable.

You could pick almost any Conservative party policy and come to the same conclusion.
 

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
This has been the Tories' plan forever. Underfund the NHS until it's at breaking point and then present privatisation as the only alternative.

Who benefits? Themselves, their rich mates, and their corporate lobbyists and donors.

Who loses? Everyone else, but especially the poorest and most vulnerable.

You could pick almost any Conservative party policy and come to the same conclusion.
Look at what they've done in education as the blueprint. Turning schools into corporations with snazzy logos and meaningless slogans
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
This has been the Tories' plan forever. Underfund the NHS until it's at breaking point and then present privatisation as the only alternative.

Who benefits? Themselves, their rich mates, and their corporate lobbyists and donors.

Who loses? Everyone else, but especially the poorest and most vulnerable.

You could pick almost any Conservative party policy and come to the same conclusion.

There’s a certain strain of eugenics in certain parts of upper class society and thus the Tories that I’m convinced has a part to play here. That and naked greed of course.
 

clint van damme

Well-Known Member
More Boris stories breaking out this morning.



I can't help but wonder, (tin foil hat time but nothing is surprising with the tories),
if this current round of stories haven't been leaked to keep this one, which has had remarkably little coverage, out of the news?


Whether it's true or not Johnsons failure to investigate some of the claims in the Russia report was pretty wreckless.
I'm sure his close friendship with at least 2 oligarchs is just coincidence and had no baring on his decision.
 

skybluetony176

Well-Known Member
I can't help but wonder, (tin foil hat time but nothing is surprising with the tories),
if this current round of stories haven't been leaked to keep this one, which has had remarkably little coverage, out of the news?


Whether it's true or not Johnsons failure to investigate some of the claims in the Russia report was pretty wreckless.
I'm sure his close friendship with at least 2 oligarchs is just coincidence and had no baring on his decision.
Could be that but also could be a counter to apparently Boris is still planning a comeback this year overthrowing Sunak.

Whatever happens it’s clearly going to be another messy year in government. Sunak clearly doesn’t have his party behind him, the country behind him or the ability to change that. We need a GE so bad.
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
Could be that but also could be a counter to apparently Boris is still planning a comeback this year overthrowing Sunak.

Whatever happens it’s clearly going to be another messy year in government. Sunak clearly doesn’t have his party behind him, the country behind him or the ability to change that. We need a GE so bad.

We won’t get one until they’re forced. So likely 2025. They’re trying to milk the country for all its worth before they get booted out for a generation it seems.
 

clint van damme

Well-Known Member
Could be that but also could be a counter to apparently Boris is still planning a comeback this year overthrowing Sunak.

Whatever happens it’s clearly going to be another messy year in government. Sunak clearly doesn’t have his party behind him, the country behind him or the ability to change that. We need a GE so bad.

They're so fractured now it's impossible for them to appoint anyone as leader who'd have the broad support of the party.
 

Sky Blue Pete

Well-Known Member
Fucking hell, even by the incredibly low standards of this government this is shocking. Should lead to resignations but that doesn't seem to be a thing anymore
People just don’t give a shit do they. Probably their fault much like other children groomed on line or in the care system. We really don’t deserve good things as humans we are so shit at caring for the vulnerable
 
D

Deleted member 9744

Guest
People just don’t give a shit do they. Probably their fault much like other children groomed on line or in the care system. We really don’t deserve good things as humans we are so shit at caring for the vulnerable
Totally agree. This is truly appalling.
 

Sky_Blue_Dreamer

Well-Known Member

Imagine if he'd won the leadership instead of Boris...

Yes, he's still a Tory and the ideology that goes with that but at least he seems to have a brain and some common sense.

Though saying that the Tory nutters would have got rid of him so quick it'd make Truss look like a multi-term PM
 

skybluetony176

Well-Known Member
Imagine if he'd won the leadership instead of Boris...

Yes, he's still a Tory and the ideology that goes with that but at least he seems to have a brain and some common sense.

Though saying that the Tory nutters would have got rid of him so quick it'd make Truss look like a multi-term PM
Imagine the people who would never have been in the cabinet.
 

clint van damme

Well-Known Member
We're 23 days into the new year and we're on what, 3 scandals already?
The sooner we get rid of these jokers the better.
I'm no Starmer fan, but they're making almost impossible for me not to vote for him, it's essential that we get rid of them at the first opportunity.
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
We're 23 days into the new year and we're on what, 3 scandals already?
The sooner we get rid of these jokers the better.
I'm no Starmer fan, but they're making almost impossible for me not to vote for him, it's essential that we get rid of them at the first opportunity.

sadly the first thing they did when they got into power was scrap the mechanism for doing that. We’re stuck with them another two and a bit years.
 

skybluetony176

Well-Known Member
sadly the first thing they did when they got into power was scrap the mechanism for doing that. We’re stuck with them another two and a bit years.
I think it’s pretty much maximum 2 years to the day. Might sound like I’m nitpicking but look at the damage they can do in “a bit”. We need to be grateful that it’s 2 years exactly and not 2 and a bit ;)
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
I think it’s pretty much maximum 2 years to the day. Might sound like I’m nitpicking but look at the damage they can do in “a bit”. We need to be grateful that it’s 2 years exactly and not 2 and a bit ;)

Wasn’t sure how much of a bit. That’s actually cheered be up a (unspecified) bit.
 

chiefdave

Well-Known Member
And don’t forget. It’s all your fault


Wasn't there a news item last week that the top 1% get two thirds of new wealth? Sounds to me like they're not paying their fair share. How much tax does Rothermere pay?

Also, if half of households need more in benefits than they are paying in tax doesn't that mean a lot of people's salaries don't even reach the threshold for the absolute minimum level of income required to survive? Although I'm sure they will have included pensioners which will massively skew the figures
 

Sky_Blue_Dreamer

Well-Known Member
Wasn't there a news item last week that the top 1% get two thirds of new wealth? Sounds to me like they're not paying their fair share. How much tax does Rothermere pay?

Also, if half of households need more in benefits than they are paying in tax doesn't that mean a lot of people's salaries don't even reach the threshold for the absolute minimum level of income required to survive? Although I'm sure they will have included pensioners which will massively skew the figures
This was my response too.

I felt pretty sure that the top 10% of earners earn something like 60-70% of the money so what this story actually says is:

Rich people don't pay their fair share.
 

skybluetony176

Well-Known Member
Wasn't there a news item last week that the top 1% get two thirds of new wealth? Sounds to me like they're not paying their fair share. How much tax does Rothermere pay?

Also, if half of households need more in benefits than they are paying in tax doesn't that mean a lot of people's salaries don't even reach the threshold for the absolute minimum level of income required to survive? Although I'm sure they will have included pensioners which will massively skew the figures
Was thinking the same, especially regarding pensioners.
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
Wasn't there a news item last week that the top 1% get two thirds of new wealth? Sounds to me like they're not paying their fair share. How much tax does Rothermere pay?

Also, if half of households need more in benefits than they are paying in tax doesn't that mean a lot of people's salaries don't even reach the threshold for the absolute minimum level of income required to survive? Although I'm sure they will have included pensioners which will massively skew the figures

It includes health and education spending. It’s a total fix. Oh Noes! My 7 year old is a leech on society!!
 

CCFCSteve

Well-Known Member
We're 23 days into the new year and we're on what, 3 scandals already?
The sooner we get rid of these jokers the better.
I'm no Starmer fan, but they're making almost impossible for me not to vote for him, it's essential that we get rid of them at the first opportunity.

Sunaks surely got to get rid of zahawi, who if he had any integrity would’ve resigned already. Like all this things its as much the actions after the ‘crime’ as the crime itself. Heard he’s not the nicest of guys, this just reinforces that view.

Also, how Johnson still has he level of party support I’ll never know. WTF do people think would be different if he returned to power 🤷‍♂️…the fact he had Zahawi as chancellor, albeit for a short period, says it all
 
D

Deleted member 5849

Guest
Sunaks surely got to get rid of zahawi, who if he had any integrity would’ve resigned already. Like all this things its as much the actions after the ‘crime’ as the crime itself. Heard he’s not the nicest of guys, this just reinforces that view.

Also, how Johnson still has he level of party support I’ll never know. WTF do people think would be different if he returned to power 🤷‍♂️…the fact he had Zahawi as chancellor, albeit for a short period, says it all
He'll still get elected in Stratford, you watch!
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top