covcity4life
Well-Known Member
Yeah, like Shaw is...
is shaw one of those 3? nope. robins,money & ince.
also shaw has lost all 3 games yet is still only 3 pts of thorns record,so hardly a big difference.
Yeah, like Shaw is...
Based on what Wasall fans have said to me I'd go for Money. He did really well at Walsall with an inherited squad and no money. And if he's going to play Mcsheffrey upfront then fan bloody tastic. The managers we've had have shown how gormless they really are by not playing the best finisher in the team in his natural position.
is shaw one of those 3? nope. robins,money & ince.
also shaw has lost all 3 games yet is still only 3 pts of thorns record,so hardly a big difference.
its funny that Robins was the choice of Ranson to superceed Coleman and instead we got Thorn under the weight of fan support .....:laugh:
You mean Boothroyd, surely? I wonder where we would be now if we had appointed Robins instead?
Probably in exactly the same League we're in now - except Robins would have left by now having fallen out with the board; whereas Thorn kept quiet and accepted all the shit - and ultimately the blame from idiots.
We had a threadbare squad of children no matter how you look at it - and would likely have been relegated under most Managers.
Do you think Thorn instructed certain players to miss chances, gift the opposition easy goals etc? Obviously not, they just weren't good enough.
Do you think Thorn instructed certain players to miss chances, gift the opposition easy goals etc? Obviously not, they just weren't good enough.
Probably in exactly the same League we're in now - except Robins would have left by now having fallen out with the board; whereas Thorn kept quiet and accepted all the shit - and ultimately the blame from idiots.
We had a threadbare squad of children no matter how you look at it - and would likely have been relegated under most Managers.