Player ratings (7 Viewers)

Ross1247

Well-Known Member
Really hard one to rate, proper game of 2 half's. Some players who had great spells also had awful spells like bnc.

Overall thought sheaf was very good, hamer and gyokeres also good. Though JWE was a threat in 2nd half but had a lot of stray passes, Doyle similar.
 

Evo1883

Well-Known Member
Mate I don't care about Walker at Blackpool. Clearly exaggerating. I've explained multiple times the Walker/Godden stance.

All this because you're so angry that I have Eccles .5 extra than Godden. Madness.
Godden practically got us a point today with his contribution.. that alone is worth more than Eccles

Fact
 

Evo1883

Well-Known Member
In your opinion. I used to enjoy posting on this forum, but people like you are ruining it. Unless you suck off Godden and say everyone's fucking brilliant all of the time you're on their backs. There is no debate.

I tell you what why don't you put me on ignore and I'll put you on ignore. That way we can both stay happy and enjoy the forum.

Evo is on ignore - bye.


Sent from my Pixel 7 using Tapatalk
Ya big fanny
 

Boosh

Well-Known Member
In your opinion. I used to enjoy posting on this forum, but people like you are ruining it. Unless you suck off Godden and say everyone's fucking brilliant all of the time you're on their backs. There is no debate.

I tell you what why don't you put me on ignore and I'll put you on ignore. That way we can both stay happy and enjoy the forum.

Evo is on ignore - bye.


Sent from my Pixel 7 using Tapatalk
Grow up
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
Also let's come away from godden and talk about your irrational hatred of cuffy ... you actually think the lad was a 5.5 today ?

He ran them ragged second half

He was rubbish until the last 15 minutes
 

Evo1883

Well-Known Member
He was rubbish until the last 15 minutes
This just isn't true , I agree his spell here in general has been pretty poor .. but today he was a threat for much of the game .. first 20 minutes he was a bit meh .. his delivery first half was also a bit meh ..

Second half they generally were shit scared of him

Point is he's definitely earned more than a 5.5
 

stevefloyd

Well-Known Member
Godden lucky goal or well placed we will never know but up to that point he was largely anonymous..If we are lucky enough to get promoted Godden is way too slow for the prem unless we have some players to create more with intelligent passing he has done well for us but time is not on his side...Eccles would also be surplus as would Allen too so lets be real and stop trying to prove who has the biggest dick on here...We all love our team but we all have our own ideas rightly or wrongly
 

Evo1883

Well-Known Member
Godden lucky goal or well placed we will never know but up to that point he was largely anonymous..If we are lucky enough to get promoted Godden is way too slow for the prem unless we have some players to create more with intelligent passing he has done well for us but time is not on his side...Eccles would also be surplus as would Allen too so lets be real and stop trying to prove who has the biggest dick on here...We all love our team but we all have our own ideas rightly or wrongly

You won't get any arguments about godden playing in the prem for us steve , we'd need much better
 

CCFCSteve

Well-Known Member
Some batshit criticism of Vik again I see. Thought he had a very good second half. He's missed 2 efforts from outside the box, both of which he created himself with some excellent play. Another assist too.

The two WBs played well and Godden scored, what’s a grumpy fan to do 🤷‍♂️

Edit - also hard for Vik when every time he turns a defender they foul him. Watford shared the yellows around well.
 
Last edited:
D

Deleted member 5849

Guest
I take alot of what this forum says with a pinch of salt most the time .. usually way off reality
You know I looked, expecting it to be a five or something you were upset at, but it seems to be a seven? I mean that's a rating that says he played well, doesn't it? And isn't it fair that he was totally anonymous first half? And sure, I'm with you in that that isn't necessarily his fault, he's got Gyokeres there atm who hates passing, wants to play in the same space, and needs a partner who's happy to just give him the ball whereas what Godden needs is Gyokeres to make space with his strength, and actually pass to him isn't it!

If it was just for second half maybe it'd be harsh, but half the ratings on this site always seem coloured (to me) by what happens in second half rather than overall.

Hate to say it, but isn't 'good' perfectly OK as a rating today?
 

wingy

Well-Known Member
Godden lucky goal or well placed we will never know but up to that point he was largely anonymous..If we are lucky enough to get promoted Godden is way too slow for the prem unless we have some players to create more with intelligent passing he has done well for us but time is not on his side...Eccles would also be surplus as would Allen too so lets be real and stop trying to prove who has the biggest dick on here...We all love our team but we all have our own ideas rightly or wrongly
Deffo meant it

Although he didn't argue much when interviewed.
 

CCFCSteve

Well-Known Member
Fadz has had a below par period yes , he's been generally good this season

Thought he a lot better second half, a couple of great bits of defending to stop Watford on the break. Whole team stepped up intensity after goal, just frustrating it takes that to see it…but also probably why we’ll come up just a bit short this season
 

Evo1883

Well-Known Member
You know I looked, expecting it to be a five or something you were upset at, but it seems to be a seven? I mean that's a rating that says he played well, doesn't it? And isn't it fair that he was totally anonymous first half? And sure, I'm with you in that that isn't necessarily his fault, he's got Gyokeres there atm who hates passing, wants to play in the same space, and needs a partner who's happy to just give him the ball whereas what Godden needs is Gyokeres to make space with his strength, and actually pass to him isn't it!

If it was just for second half maybe it'd be harsh, but half the ratings on this site always seem coloured (to me) by what happens in second half rather than overall.

Hate to say it, but isn't 'good' perfectly OK as a rating today?


It is what it is , let's not make out fans on here don't give him a shit ride ? Smart comments like " are you his agent " mean nothing do they .. when the lad gets such a rough ride from several posters on here , and they simply talk shit , they deserve to get a bit back when godden basically wins us a point today
 
D

Deleted member 5849

Guest
It is what it is , let's not make out fans on here don't give him a shit ride ? Smart comments like " are you his agent " mean nothing do they .. when the lad gets such a rough ride from several posters on here , and they simply talk shit , they deserve to get a bit back when godden basically wins us a point today
But the defence of rating of good is a bit mental tbf!
 

pusbccfc

Well-Known Member

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
Again though mate , you think the same about allen when he runs around alot .. 🤔

If you want to say Godden and Allen are about the same level I think you’re being harsh on Godden but I’ll take it. For me at the level we are at you need a bit more about you, I suspect Eccles will be in that group too. Sheaf, Hamer, Vik, Cal, McNally are on a different level to the likes of Wilson, Allen and Godden and I’ll make no apologies for wanting more of the former and less of the latter.
 

Evo1883

Well-Known Member
If you want to say Godden and Allen are about the same level I think you’re being harsh on Godden but I’ll take it. For me at the level we are at you need a bit more about you, I suspect Eccles will be in that group too. Sheaf, Hamer, Vik, Cal, McNally are on a different level to the likes of Wilson, Allen and Godden and I’ll make no apologies for wanting more of the former and less of the latter.
And we all know me and you don't agree on allen
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top