OLD OLD OLD OLD OLD NEWS : CET: Deal struck for half of the stadium with Higgs Trust (9 Viewers)

skyblu3sk

Well-Known Member
Months of deadlock ends with groundbreaking `headline agreement'

A DEAL has been struck over Coventry City football club owning half the Ricoh stadium, the Telegraph can reveal.
Coventry City Council leaders have been briefed that a groundbreaking “headline agreement“ has been reached for Sky Blues owners Sisu to buy a 50 per cent stake in the Ricoh Arena company from the Alan Edward Higgs Charity.

The agreement follows months of deadlock over a deal considered a financial lifeline by the relegated Division One club incurring multi-million-pound annual losses.

Rumours of administration or liquidation for the club deprived of income from stadium commercial activities were alleviated when hedge fund Sisu agreed to pay any losses this season.

The Telegraph revealed in June an initial offer by Sisu had been rejected by the Higgs charity. The two parties have had secret talks intermittently since.

The breakthrough comes as John Mutton * leader of Coventry City Council which owns the other half-stake in Ricoh company Arena Coventry Ltd (ACL) * challenged Sky Blues chief executive Tim Fisher's claims Sisu has wiped out the club's debts by paying off creditors.

Coun Mutton said, while Sisu itself was the club's main creditor, he understood the club had still not paid six months of rent arrears worth £600,000 into a joint bank account, to enable ACL to continue receiving payments.

The council leader also revealed a deadline for an agreement between the club and ACL over a lower rent had been extended for a month, until October 13.

The Telegraph revealed last month the Sky Blues had rejected an ACL offer to half the annual rent to £650,000 after a High Court ruling ACL had the right to recover full rent under previous agreements.

Controlling Labour cabinet members at the council were briefed on Wednesday about the Higgs/Sisu shares agreement.

Council leader John Mutton, facing accusations by Tory opponents of secrecy over negotiations after councillors were forced to sign confidentiality agreements, told the Telegraph: “Sisu and the Higgs charity have had discussions. I understand a price has been agreed.

“...I believe they’ve reached headline terms. There is still agreement to be reached on how and when it is to be paid.

“I knew they had agreed headline figures. My group are aware of that now.” Coun Mutton said he had not had direct talks recently with Sisu or the Higgs charity, but council officers had been updating him. The council’s representatives on the ACL board are chief executive Martin Reeves and council finance director Chris West.

Coun Mutton said he was not aware of the price agreed between Sisu and the Higgs charity, who would have to agree the fineprint before the full council of 54 councillors would vote on the deal.

The council could use a veto

blocking any deal on Ricoh shares if it was considered not to be in the interests of city taxpayers.
At Tuesday’s full council meeting, Coun Mutton re-iterated evidence was requested this summer from Mayfair-based Sisu that it had a “proper business case” for both investment in the Sky Blues and the development of a leisure complex around the stadium, including hotels.

ACL recorded profits of just £470,000 last year, expected to rise to £1million this year.

The council has yet to receive any dividend from its 50 per cent share. Any profits would first be used to pay back a £21million ACL loan to Yorkshire Bank. The loan was originally taken out by the council to rescue the Ricoh project in 2003 and ensure the stadium was built on the contaminated former Foleshill gasworks site.

Development of the “leisure land” – including more hotels to support the stadium’s hotel and conferences, and events including concerts – is seen as crucial in raising Ricoh revenue. The council also wants the development to create jobs in return for taxpayer investment in the disadvantaged north-east of Coventry.

The 2003 deal gave the council and football club 50 per cent each of ACL shares. But the Sky Blues sold its half-stake to the Higgs

charity in 2007 for a reported £6million, to stave off a threat of administration.
A complicated formula giving the football club an option to buy back the shares has long been rumoured to price Higg’s charity’s 50 per cent at £10million.

The Higgs charity’s Peter Knatchbull-Hugessen told the Telegraph in June Sisu’s initial rejected offer had been outside the formula.

News of the headline agreement comes days after Daniel Gidney resigned as ACL chief executive, and was understood to be increasingly disillusioned over the prospect of a deal with Sisu over stadium ownership.

Coun Mutton said the council still had a “not for sale” policy on its 50 per cent share.

But he added, if “a fantastic offer came in” for the council’s shares, the full council could vote on a change of policy.

Tim Fisher, Sky Blues chief executive, said: “We have made an undertaking not to discuss this matter publically. It is a highlysensitive commercial negotiation which all sides have undertaken to conclude before speaking to other parties. On the issue of financial debt and creditor profile of the football club, I am more than happy to go through the appropriate details with Coun Mutton in person and in private.”
 

@richh87

Member
Not sure how I feel about this. Should the evil SISU be allowed to tighten their grip on our football club?, or is this a positive step towards being financially viable?

We all know we need the ground to be CCFC owned for our long term future - just didn't want SISU to be the ones to do it.

This will certainly make us stronger under the financial fair play criteria. I just hope there are clauses stopping SISU from ditching CCFC and hanging on to the stadium!
 

Diehard Si

New Member
I know people are dubious but this is a step in the right direction. We all hate SISU, but we are stuck with them.

But all clubs should own their stadiums.
 

Evans020

New Member
Fantastic news..whichever way you look at it before today we were screwed in the long term..now there's hope
 

covkid69

Well-Known Member
If this is true it could be the lifeline we desperately need. Hope it can all go through quickly and smoothly.

this is Shitsu we're talking about....when do they ever do things quickly and smoothly.....can't even sign a player or a manager with them fannying about and taking forever :claping hands::claping hands:
 

Evans020

New Member
Just one thing ..the rent issue will be interesting now..especially if the club own just as much as acl/ council..
Can't work out if we will still have to pay rent..or 500,000 a year now instead lol
 

Sub

Well-Known Member
really did not want them to own the stadium but in the end they have got what they wanted all along !! will the club benifit from this ??? only time will tell but nothing is never clear cut and straight forward SISU:(:(
 

coundonskyblue

New Member
<p>
really did not want them to own the stadium but in the end they have got what they wanted all along !! will the club benifit from this ??? only time will tell but nothing is never clear cut and straight forward SISU<img src="http://www.skybluestalk.co.uk/images/smilies/icon_e_sad.gif" border="0" alt="" title="" smilieid="11" class="inlineimg" /><img src="http://www.skybluestalk.co.uk/images/smilies/icon_e_sad.gif" border="0" alt="" title="" smilieid="11" class="inlineimg" />

I feel the same, but the positive I take out of it is it should make us more attractive for new owners.
 

Ccfcisparks

Well-Known Member
Good news, we are stuck with SISU and buying half the stadium is a push in the right direction. Also it makes the club look more appealing to potential investors??
 

Otis

Well-Known Member
Owning half the stadium makes a takeover a more tasty proposition to any would be buyers.

Maybe this is why Elliot, Hoffman and two unknown gentlemen were raising glasses and toasting on Wednesday night. ;)
 

Chipfat

Well-Known Member
If all is agreed and signed it puts SISU in a strong position in all areas to either fund the club or demand a money offer from a potential buyer as now they have a sellable asset instead of a lose making business. The other option is to look for a co-investor who is willing to develope the surrounding area and therefore create even more money into the club...

Still not sure if im happy with SISU at the the helm and didn't really want signs that they were sticking it out, but if it makes the club stronger and able to compete at the top end of not just in our league i suppose its good news:confused:..
 

Ccfcisparks

Well-Known Member
Owning half the stadium makes a takeover a more tasty proposition to any would be buyers.

Maybe this is why Elliot, Hoffman and two unknown gentlemen were raising glasses and toasting on Wednesday night. ;)

:O Maybe they had a deal agreed but only if SISU Purchased half the stadium! You have got the rumour mill turning now Otis! :claping hands:
 

wolfie

New Member
Not sure how I feel about this. Should the evil SISU be allowed to tighten their grip on our football club?, or is this a positive step towards being financially viable?<br />
<br />
We all know we need the ground to be CCFC owned for our long term future - just didn't want SISU to be the ones to do it.<br />
<br />
This will certainly make us stronger under the financial fair play criteria. I just hope there are clauses stopping SISU from ditching CCFC and hanging on to the stadium!
<br />
<br />perhaps if this is true we should give sisu a second chance. For me this sounds like great news
 

Otis

Well-Known Member
Not sure if it was Ranson, Hoffman or both, but yep, Robins it was suggested was the man.

Hmmm,

1. Deal struck for stadium
2. Robins in as manager, the man Ranson wanted.
3. Ranson and Hoffman at game on Tuesday
4. Elliott and Hoffman raising glasses on Wednesday night.

Come on people, you just know it and you're thinking what I'm thinking!!!! :whistle:
 

Mucca Mad Boys

Well-Known Member
This is great news, this will bring in that extra revenue we so deperately need, we can go to a concert, or buy a rip off bottle of pop and know some it is going to the club.

Hopefully we can invest a little bit in the playing staff in January as well.
 

AFCCOVENTRY

Well-Known Member
This is massive news.

The 50% ownership of te ricoh could really turn around our decline over 10 years.

Interesting Mutton now saying a very good offer comes in and they will sell the council shares.

Sisu putting the money in and not all talk.
 

Evans020

New Member
This is massive news.

The 50% ownership of te ricoh could really turn around our decline over 10 years.

Interesting Mutton now saying a very good offer comes in and they will sell the council shares.

Sisu putting the money in and not all talk.
Exactly..there is no negatives to this, its for the best
 

torchomatic

Well-Known Member
Good news, if true.
 

Mucca Mad Boys

Well-Known Member
.....so SISU had £10m+ tucked away all along, yet they still got us relegated ?:confused:

So they could save it on buying 1/2 rather than employing playing staff, this means we can be a profitable 'business' (I hate that in footy, but that's how it is) so we can then buy playing staff as we won't be losing as much or, even gaining per week!

Thing is, you have to sort this into a hierarchy, off the field is more important than players, spend too much on players whilst not making profit OR a little loss, you end up like Portsmouth, NO one here wants that!
 

LevelBest

Member
If that is one of the conditions of sale then I would think they've got investors lined up to develop the surrounding area
 

ccfcway

Well-Known Member
i'd love to be happy about this, but i can see SISU happily running a break even league two club, and reaping the rewards of new hotels, resturants and facilities that the real estate will bring to the area, is this not exactly what they wanted all along, to get their hands on the land to be able to build and profit from ?
 

@richh87

Member
SISU may well have found separate investors to fund the 50% of ACL purchase.

As above, there is a theory that they could happily take the profit from ACL and leave the football club to struggle; but then CCFC success means more people attending games, and more revenue - so maybe it'll be a good thing.

In the short term it will increase our turnover and mean the fair play rules won't kick us in the nuts.
 
Last edited:

LevelBest

Member
I think what they wanted was promotion to the premiership and use some of the £80m+ premier league income to buy the stadium. They'd have a stadium they own that would be full each week and all the matchday income, sponsorship and event money. Then they could sell and make a huge profit for their investors. Only problem was they underestimated how much need to be invested in the team to get promoted and then bottled it and started sellingt he best players (Dann, Fox etc)
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top