Transfer Rumour Scott Twine (4 Viewers)

[Yorkshire SB]

If that’s the case he will be available and I suspect Robins will know that.

Only issue for me could be McNally's wages. I reckon he earns a fair amount

 

---

[JimmyHillsbeard]

McNally and or Twine as makeweights in a Gyökeres deal otherwise I doubt there’s anything in either of these for us.

 

[Matt smith]

Pessimistic I’m saying £20m (£15m Vik £5m Gus) and we get £8m of that. Brighton get £3M and the rest on Doug’s hairspray (running costs).

@shmmeee don’t think we’ll sell Gus for 5 million

He’s worth keeping and letting go for free in that case, 10 I’d disagree

 

[shmmeee]

@shmmeee don’t think we’ll sell Gus for 5 million

He’s worth keeping and letting go for free in that case, 10 I’d disagree

Im being pessimistic. That’s the absolute lowest I can see us getting. We’ve had bids just under that for Gus before. I’d agree at that price if he will stay its worth keeping him. Big if tho.

 

[Deleted member 5849]

Surely whether it's worth keeping Hamer is dependent on who you have lined up to replace, and expand the squad with, dependent on what fees are received?

 

[Senior Vick from Alicante]

We have just received 20 million quid over three years for losing in the play off final. Bust a gut to get Hamer signed on a 20k a week contract over 3 years, not worried about losing VG as much. With a fit O'Hare and Palmer we have 2 creative players that create the chances so a finisher in the box would be a different type of player to Vic potentially, a younger Godden for instance. The money needs spending at the back rather than relying on loans, think Fadz is possibly in his last season coming around and we desperately need 2 proper wing backs rather than full backs. Robins has always got it right so far its whether the new recruitment team are up to it now. The result aside at the weekend its great to be a City fan at the moment.

 

[TomRad85]

Surely whether it's worth keeping Hamer is dependent on who you have lined up to replace, and expand the squad with, dependent on what fees are received?

yeh tbf you're spot on, if the management think they have an ideal replacement lined up but need the Hamer money to make it happen then obviously they'll want to move him on.

 

[Grendel]

We have just received 20 million quid over three years for losing in the play off final. Bust a gut to get Hamer signed on a 20k a week contract over 3 years, not worried about losing VG as much. With a fit O'Hare and Palmer we have 2 creative players that create the chances so a finisher in the box would be a different type of player to Vic potentially, a younger Godden for instance. The money needs spending at the back rather than relying on loans, think Fadz is possibly in his last season coming around and we desperately need 2 proper wing backs rather than full backs. Robins has always got it right so far its whether the new recruitment team are up to it now. The result aside at the weekend its great to be a City fan at the moment.

We’ve not received anything other than match receipts for the play offs

 

[Sick Boy]

We have just received 20 million quid over three years for losing in the play off final.

What?

 

[PVA]

Certain Robins will have his targets, I like McNally but I doubt he will move from a prem club to a championship one.

He’s about 6th in the pecking order at Burnley and they’ll obviously strengthen the squad so he’ll probably slip further down the line.

 

[Senior Vick from Alicante]

We’ve not received anything other than match receipts for the play offs

Thought we got Premier League solidarity payments of £4.5m a year for next 3 years plus £6.9 across the 3 years from the EFL? Thats what has been reported from a football finance blogger via Twitter, blokes called @Swissramble. seems legit.

 

[GIMOC]

Thought we got Premier League solidarity payments of £4.5m a year for next 3 years plus £6.9 across the 3 years from the EFL? Thats what has been reported from a football finance blogger via Twitter, blokes called @Swissramble. seems legit.

Those numbers are what all teams get in the league regardless. the only extra income is gate receipts from Saturday which is around the 2-3 mill mark. better than nothing that should be reinvested in the team

 

[Flying Fokker]

Thought we got Premier League solidarity payments of £4.5m a year for next 3 years plus £6.9 across the 3 years from the EFL? Thats what has been reported from a football finance blogger via Twitter, blokes called @Swissramble. seems legit.

He only mentions gate receipts. Someone asked him. @Swissramble

 

[Matt smith]

Those numbers are what all teams get in the league regardless. the only extra income is gate receipts from Saturday which is around the 2-3 mill mark. better than nothing that should be reinvested in the team

Yeah I reckon we’ll have made a couple million from the play offs, that’s the McNally fee say

 

[CCFCSteve]

he won’t play though and surely we can beat match his wages. Seems to like it here and well respected. Certain starter also in a challenging championship side

Agree. I’m not sure he’s quite good enough on the ball yet for Burnley’s style of play in the Prem. Whether they think he can develop that after another seasons loan, who knows. I’d 100% have him back here though loan or perm

Final prices for Vik and Hamer will be dictated by number of bidding clubs. Hopefully they’ll be a bit of a bidding war for both, assuming they don’t sign new contracts (which I just can’t see unfortunately)

 

[SBAndy]

Those numbers are what all teams get in the league regardless. the only extra income is gate receipts from Saturday which is around the 2-3 mill mark. better than nothing that should be reinvested in the team

That’s the confusion. Everyone in the league gets the ‘PL solidarity payments’. It’s only used in the example to show the real-terms difference between winning and losing.

 

[Londonccfcfan]

Certain Robins will have his targets, I like McNally but I doubt he will move from a prem club to a championship one.

McNally is nowhere near prem level YET. So he would be sat on bench as 6th choice. Or will be sent back out on loan.

 

[Grendel]

Depends on McNally wages really - and if any promotion clauses in his contract

 

[Old Warwickshire lad]

Don’t forget SISU are bound to be in for a share of transfer fees.
Be amazed if they didn’t negotiate that.

 

[Mucca Mad Boys]

Don’t forget SISU are bound to be in for a share of transfer fees.
Be amazed if they didn’t negotiate that.

There’s no evidence of that and it doesn’t really seem to be a standard practice.

 

[SkyblueDad]

Don’t forget SISU are bound to be in for a share of transfer fees.
Be amazed if they didn’t negotiate that.

I wouldn’t give them fuck all, let them try and batter us in court.

 

[its a buzzard]

Pessimistic I’m saying £20m (£15m Vik £5m Gus) and we get £8m of that. Brighton get £3M and the rest on Doug’s hairspray (running costs).

I gave you a like for the hairspray comment - laughed out loud. I can't believe Gus is only worth a third of Vik, though.

Sent from my MAR-LX1A using Tapatalk

 

[SBAndy]

There’s no evidence of that and it doesn’t really seem to be a standard practice.

I recall Hoffman discussed putting in place something similar, but your standard practice in a corporate sense would be essentially some form of profit-sharing arrangement. Can’t really do that with football clubs, mind.

 

[shmmeee]

I gave you a like for the hairspray comment - laughed out loud. I can't believe Gus is only worth a third of Vik, though.

Sent from my MAR-LX1A using Tapatalk

Strikers are always worth more.

 

[Deleted member 5849]

Strikers are always worth more.

He has also been more consistent over two seasons.

 

[Skybluedownunder]

True but Burnley don’t need the money

Don’t think they’d just be leaving money on the table given where their finances were the other year and with a new owner, they would be wanting to profit off a good player given the chance. He played very well for us while here and therefore we must pay a price for that. Plus they will be thinking we are cashed up if we sell Gyokeres and they are probably dirty about not getting him or O’Hare


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[thekidfromstrettoncamp]

I thought when we took McNally on loan it was with a view to a deal being done (unlike Doyle) there would have been talks about how much a deal would cost.

 

[blunted]

We have just received 20 million quid over three years for losing in the play off final. Bust a gut to get Hamer signed on a 20k a week contract over 3 years, not worried about losing VG as much. With a fit O'Hare and Palmer we have 2 creative players that create the chances so a finisher in the box would be a different type of player to Vic potentially, a younger Godden for instance. The money needs spending at the back rather than relying on loans, think Fadz is possibly in his last season coming around and we desperately need 2 proper wing backs rather than full backs. Robins has always got it right so far its whether the new recruitment team are up to it now. The result aside at the weekend its great to be a City fan at the moment.

20 million no way 2 million if we are lucky

 

[mark82]

We have just received 20 million quid over three years for losing in the play off final. Bust a gut to get Hamer signed on a 20k a week contract over 3 years, not worried about losing VG as much. With a fit O'Hare and Palmer we have 2 creative players that create the chances so a finisher in the box would be a different type of player to Vic potentially, a younger Godden for instance. The money needs spending at the back rather than relying on loans, think Fadz is possibly in his last season coming around and we desperately need 2 proper wing backs rather than full backs. Robins has always got it right so far its whether the new recruitment team are up to it now. The result aside at the weekend its great to be a City fan at the moment.

We receive 20m over 3 years for being in the Championship. Don't think it's anything to do with the playoff final.