Training ground (4 Viewers)

[Deleted member 5849]

OK so it was flagged up that King didn't pay for the improvements, but nobody seems to want to tell me who did.

Who paid for the training ground improvements? Somebody must have a definitive answer eh.

Eh?

Eh eh?

 

---

[usskyblue]

@slowpoke is your best bet m8

 

[David O'Day]

OK so it was flagged up that King didn't pay for the improvements, but nobody seems to want to tell me who did.

Who paid for the training ground improvements? Somebody must have a definitive answer eh.

Eh?

Eh eh?

They eBayed a couple of the handbags joy had left around the place

 

[mark82]

OK so it was flagged up that King didn't pay for the improvements, but nobody seems to want to tell me who did.

Who paid for the training ground improvements? Somebody must have a definitive answer eh.

Eh?

Eh eh?

Flagged where?

 

[Deleted member 5849]

@slowpoke is your best bet m8

I'm hoping for @GIMOC myself.

There are some others too.

 

[Deleted member 5849]

Flagged where?

On one of the interminable threads we've got. If it was posted as King didn't, then the obvious assumption is that somebody must know who did eh, else they wouldn't be able to know that King didn't.

And the obvious assumption is that one of our many ITKs must know.

They know, you know. They've got experience.

 

[djr8369]

Certainly a question that needs answering.

 

[Grendel]

On one of the interminable threads we've got. If it was posted as King didn't, then the obvious assumption is that somebody must know who did eh, else they wouldn't be able to know that King didn't.

And the obvious assumption is that one of our many ITKs must know.

They know, you know. They've got experience.

he’s got problems that’s for sure

 

[mark82]

On one of the interminable threads we've got. If it was posted as King didn't, then the obvious assumption is that somebody must know who did eh, else they wouldn't be able to know that King didn't.

And the obvious assumption is that one of our many ITKs must know.

They know, you know. They've got experience.

Ok, I'll ignore it then.

 

[Deleted member 5849]

Ok, I'll ignore it then.

I mean there is a serious point, that if he didn't it would indeed be useful to know who did, as it would be useful to know just how improvements are being financed or otherwise. It's the same as the ground - just what the deal actually is would be useful to know if we should be optimistic or wrist slashing.

But the claim is out there, so now it's time to put meat on the bones.

 

[mark82]

I mean there is a serious point, that if he didn't it would indeed be useful to know who did, as it would be useful to know just how improvements are being financed or otherwise. It's the same as the ground - just what the deal actually is would be useful to know if we should be optimistic or wrist slashing.

But the claim is out there, so now it's time to put meat on the bones.

I agree. It's just the source of the comment being this mad house that makes me dubious.

 

[djr8369]

I agree. It's just the source of the comment being this mad house that makes me dubious.

I think it was from that tweet where the guy was listing loads of problems

 

[Deleted member 5849]

I agree. It's just the source of the comment being this mad house that makes me dubious.

Not denying that! So let's move beyond the shadowy someone / something else.

 

[Grendel]

I mean there is a serious point, that if he didn't it would indeed be useful to know who did, as it would be useful to know just how improvements are being financed or otherwise. It's the same as the ground - just what the deal actually is would be useful to know if we should be optimistic or wrist slashing.

But the claim is out there, so now it's time to put meat on the bones.

The hedge fund I assume

 

[ccfcchris]

Some posters on this forum thrive on constantly posting that this club is a basket case. It will never change. My comment is a general view and not directed at anyone in particular.

 

[Deleted member 5849]

The hedge fund I assume

The specifics about King financing operating losses was indeed... interesting phrasing.

A one-off upgrade wouldn't be an operating loss, so therefore there's a certain logic to explore.

While we're at it, I'd like to know if there's still a charge on Ryton.

 

[Hobo]

I mean there is a serious point, that if he didn't it would indeed be useful to know who did, as it would be useful to know just how improvements are being financed or otherwise. It's the same as the ground - just what the deal actually is would be useful to know if we should be optimistic or wrist slashing.

But the claim is out there, so now it's time to put meat on the bones.

You should go on Newcastle United's or Man City's forum and ask who and where is their finances actually coming from and who is actually paying for what?

 

[Deleted member 5849]

You should go on Newcastle United's or Man City's forum and ask who and where is their finances actually coming from and who is actually paying for what?

I don't support either of those clubs, so it'd be a bit daft if me to do so.

I suppose I could learn Dutch and ask Heerenveen.

 

[clint van damme]

he’s got problems that’s for sure

99 problems but a pitch ain't one

 

[Hobo]

I think you are missing my

I don't support either of those clubs, so it'd be a bit daft if me to do so.

I suppose I could learn Dutch and ask Heerenveen

I think you are missing my point?