Joel Latibeaudiere (8 Viewers)

[Flying Fokker]

Latibeaudere and Sakamoto, Oggy and Eakin what can go wrong!!!!!


Lati-beaudiere-sakamot-oware

 

---

[SleepyGinger]

we also need some top quality loans
if we can get some real quality , that will be the difference between mid table and play offs

Good loans tend to come towards the end of the window when the parent club have brought a few players in

 

[Silsden]

I like his little beard

 

[Johhny Blue]

The Gold Cup is in March, ffs

Every silver lining has a cloud

 

[fatso]

Didn't say a straight swap did I? Hamer is going and it'd about getting the best deal. Mcnally is clearly good enough. You are in the let him go for free camp I suspect.

Did I say that? No, so why you trying to put words into my mouth?

Hamer is the best player we've had for years, we should be pushing the boat out to get him to sign a new contract, if he won't, then we need to replace him with like for like (or as near as) not taking 2 players that someone doesn't want and some cash.

And although Mcnally is good enough I wouldn't want to lose Gus as part of that deal.

With Hamer in the side we have a chance of a playoff finish again. Without him we've got to hope and prey a replacement will be as successful.

 

[David O'Day]

Good loans tend to come towards the end of the window when the parent club have brought a few players in

loans that compliment a strong permanent backbone would be ideal, not like seasons passed when they had to cover glaring holes in the first xi

 

[Balli001]

Did I say that? No, so why you trying to put words into my mouth?

Hamer is the best player we've had for years, we should be pushing the boat out to get him to sign a new contract, if he won't, then we need to replace him with like for like (or as near as) not taking 2 players that someone doesn't want and some cash.

And although Mcnally is good enough I wouldn't want to lose Gus as part of that deal.

With Hamer in the side we have a chance of a playoff finish again. Without him we've got to hope and prey a replacement will be as successful.

We would be using cash to sign a defender so why not mcnally? 2 good young centre halves, 1 with experience of our club and you are dismissing them as unwanted. Do you think with any money we wouldn't replace hamer?
I don't understand your logic at all

 

[AFCCOVENTRY]

 

[fatso]

We would be using cash to sign a defender so why not mcnally? 2 good young centre halves, 1 with experience of our club and you are dismissing them as unwanted. Do you think with any money we wouldn't replace hamer?
I don't understand your logic at all

Its simple, I'd buy Mcnally for cash, but I wouldn't want to lose Hamer as part of a deal.

If (as we're led to believe, ) Hamer is holding out for more money, the club should pay that money to keep him. Hamer is vital to the way we play, and the best midfielder in the championship (imo)

Our desperate need for defenders isn't a good enough reason to lose Hamer.
(Unless it's 15+million and 2 CH and Scott Twine)

 

[Alkhen]

FFS we have signed a player with no legs. DOUG OUT

 

[Balli001]

Its simple, I'd buy Mcnally for cash, but I wouldn't want to lose Hamer as part of a deal.

If (as we're led to believe, ) Hamer is holding out for more money, the club should pay that money to keep him. Hamer is vital to the way we play, and the best midfielder in the championship (imo)

Our desperate need for defenders isn't a good enough reason to lose Hamer.
(Unless it's 15+million and 2 CH and Scott Twine)

Your figures for hamer are unrealistic. 1 year on his contract and he isnt getting to anywhere near a deal you propose. If he doesn't sign a deal we sell simple as that. Our best chance of getting mcnally permanently is in this deal.

 

[fatso]

Your figures for hamer are unrealistic. 1 year on his contract and he isnt getting to anywhere near a deal you propose. If he doesn't sign a deal we sell simple as that. Our best chance of getting mcnally permanently is in this deal.

I'd look elsewhere if they won't sell Mcnally.
Sooner miss out on him than lose Gus

 

[Manchester_sky_blue]

Its simple, I'd buy Mcnally for cash, but I wouldn't want to lose Hamer as part of a deal.

If (as we're led to believe, ) Hamer is holding out for more money, the club should pay that money to keep him. Hamer is vital to the way we play, and the best midfielder in the championship (imo)

Our desperate need for defenders isn't a good enough reason to lose Hamer.
(Unless it's 15+million and 2 CH and Scott Twine)

Total speculation, we've no idea what Hamers demands are or what the club has offered.

 

[Balli001]

I'd look elsewhere if they won't sell Mcnally.
Sooner miss out on him than lose Gus

Yea let's not have any defenders who we know are good enough just to keep gus and lose out on millions. Good call.

 

[Speedie's Head]

I'd look elsewhere if they won't sell Mcnally.
Sooner miss out on him than lose Gus

McNally would be overvalued in any swap deal.

 

[fatso]

Yea let's not have any defenders who we know are good enough just to keep gus and lose out on millions. Good call.

Wtf is the matter with you, are you on your period or something?

 

[fatso]

Total speculation, we've no idea what Hamers demands are or what the club has offered.

True, but we can only comment on the speculation.

 

[RegTheDonk]

.

Yea let's not have any defenders who we know are good enough just to keep gus and lose out on millions. Good call.

Well, we know Gus is good enough too. Why not invest in him?

 

[fatso]

Yea let's not have any defenders who we know are good enough just to keep gus and lose out on millions. Good call.

Looks like the club share my view!

Sources: Burnley bid rejected for outstanding midfielder as Coventry thwart Gustavo Hamer plan

Coventry City have rejected Burnley's player-plus-cash deal for midfielder Gustavo Hamer, TEAMtalk understands.

www.teamtalk.com

 

[Balli001]

Looks like the club share my view!

Sources: Burnley bid rejected for outstanding midfielder as Coventry thwart Gustavo Hamer plan

Coventry City have rejected Burnley's player-plus-cash deal for midfielder Gustavo Hamer, TEAMtalk understands.

www.teamtalk.com

Using that account to back up an opinion is particularly weak. More fantasy than Harry Potter that account

 

[Balli001]

.

Well, we know Gus is good enough too. Why not invest in him?

Because we don't play in the Premier league.

 

[Balli001]

Wtf is the matter with you, are you on your period or something?

Another excellent response. When is your first comedy gig?

 

[fatso]

Another excellent response. When is your first comedy gig?

You really do have issues.

 

[Balli001]

You really do have issues.

The irony is amazing

 

[fatso]

The irony is amazing

Give it up mate, your entire argument has been proved wrong by the clubs response to Burnley's bid. If you have anger management problems you should get professional help. I'm going to ignore you from now on, so I'd suggest you save your breath

 

[Offhegoes]

I am sure we're still working on getting McNally in, and a left sided Centre Back (loan or Permanent). Sure Norton-Cuffy will be the RWB they are looking at too.

 

[RegTheDonk]

Because we don't play in the Premier league.

If reports were to be believed, he isn't asking for that kind of silly money. In fact, you've said we don't know his demands or the clubs offer.

Swap deals and Gus asside, how much do you think we should pay for McNally? Just for him, a ball park figure?

 

[RegTheDonk]

Sorry this is taking the topic off track ... welcome to Latibeaudiere, hope he fits in, and nice to see we're getting some defenders in.

 

[Martin180]

If reports were to be believed, he isn't asking for that kind of silly money. In fact, you've said we don't know his demands or the clubs offer.

Swap deals and Gus asside, how much do you think we should pay for McNally? Just for him, a ball park figure?

Around £1.5 million with add ons

 

[Sky Blue Pete]

If reports were to be believed, he isn't asking for that kind of silly money. In fact, you've said we don't know his demands or the clubs offer.

Swap deals and Gus asside, how much do you think we should pay for McNally? Just for him, a ball park figure?

Between £2 and £4m

 

[SeaSeeEffCee]

Around £1.5 million with add ons

Why would Burnley sell him for less than they paid last summer?

 

[wingy]

Between £2 and £4m

What did Burney pay 2M is that structured on add ons?
The only development he got was here for which they've obviously been compensated £2.5M Max.

 

[Grendel]

Why would Burnley sell him for less than they paid last summer?

Its embarrassing

 

[Martin180]

Why would Burnley sell him for less than they paid last summer?

Is he worth more now ? He hasn’t featured for them hence the lower valuation , with add ons . Possibly up to £3 million in total

 

[Martin180]

Its embarrassing

How?