Transfer Rumour Cameron Archer (1 Viewer)

D

Deleted member 5849

Guest
Usually a no brainier though isn’t it, in this case big spending top half Villa vs relegation fodder Sheff U
Well... the argument was Villa would buy him back to sell him again for a fat profit straight after.

Player would cut out the Villa bit wouldn't they? Buying club would also end up paying less in that instance as they'd know there was a clause in there.
 

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
Seems a lot to me but i guess thats what football is now. Clever of Villa to put a buyback in, they could use it even if they don't want him, just to flip him, if he does well.
One of the rare cases where a buy back clause makes sense and will most likely be activated at the end of the season.
 

Hobo

Well-Known Member
This is an interesting read on buy back clauses. Maybe not as straightforward as some might think?

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top