Most Expensivest (2 Viewers)
- Thread starter Greggs
- Start date
Brylowes
Well-Known Member
Whatever his age it’s far to early to right him off, same goes for Simms.
itsabuzzard
Well-Known Member
Write Wright right.
Brylowes
Well-Known Member
Auright, calm down!!!
itsabuzzard
Well-Known Member
Zen-like.
Flying Fokker
Well-Known Member
I think he means most expensivest? Just run with it.
Flying Fokker
Well-Known Member
You humble puppy.
tommy hutch legend
Well-Known Member
Brilliant . Plain stupidly imoBrilliant Greggs, love it
Brylowes
Well-Known Member
Well you can’t get much calmer than that i suppose.
Covkid1968#
Well-Known Member
Think it’s more about adjusting to a new league. Robins has seen something in him, so at the moment.. that’s good enough for me
no_loyalty
Well-Known Member
It was a bit of light hearted banter ffs.
Greggs
Well-Known Member
You suspect wrong. Weirdo.
Greggs
Well-Known Member
This place is slowly falling apart. 99% of people agreeing with each other and jumping on the 1% that dare to have a different opinion.
BlueSkiesForever
Well-Known Member
I have found that as well tbf, multiple times I’ve mentioned maybe dropping Godden for a game just to try out Wright/Simms together or to try a new formation with Wright as lone striker and every time I get a range of people slating me for wanting to drop our “superstar” Godden, like he’s the best thing since sliced bread. I think it’s evident over the last few games that we don’t score goals against tight defences, can’t keep trying the same old ideas if it’s starting to become clear they don’t work.
Sky_Blue_Dreamer
Well-Known Member
With a fully fit midfield I think the box makes sense. Sheaf and Eccles holding with O'Hare and Ayari more advanced. That still leaves Kelly, Saka, Allen and Palmer on the bench.
Lone striker would have to be either Wright or Simms, though at the moment there are doubts about how effective either would be.
Posting an image of a donkey is hardly an opinion.
Greggs
Well-Known Member
But still seems to really offend you. Strange.
Not really, just pointed out that you're likely a bit of a loner who gets bullied at work.
Greggs
Well-Known Member
Thanks for that. You do realise what you're doing, don't you?
Online bullying, the same as you're doing to the two footballers you mentioned. It's a chain. What, you can give it but you can't take it?
Greggs
Well-Known Member
Watched a film last night, Tom Cruise was the main actor, was shit. Are you ok with that?
Go for it, nothing really bothers me except people slating Ostigard.
Greggs
Well-Known Member
Also, I'm critiquing an entertainer I've paid to watch. You're getting agro at a stranger on the Internet. Have a word. Are you ok with that?
Samo
Well-Known Member
Call it critiquing if it makes you feel better Greggs, it goes well beyond that for me.
It's unkind and unnecessary.
Greggs
Well-Known Member
Not you aswell, jesus. It's a fact, deal with it and stop getting angry at strangers on the Internet. Watch a shit film and eat at a poor restaurant, but pretend it was brilliant.
Skyblueweeman
Well-Known Member
I preferred the less woke days
Nick
Nice to see your apology to me a few days ago also proves my point that you never read ALL posts in a thread too ;)www.skybluestalk.co.uk
The two things I took from that is that SBK is a bit of a strange one and there was a SBT meet up that I missed
Sky_Blue_Dreamer
Well-Known Member
Are Expensivest the latest competitor to UnderArmour?
johnwillomagic
Well-Known Member
I'm frankly disappointed after last night I am not viewing a new donkey gif....
