Premier League thread (44 Viewers)

ovduk78

Well-Known Member
Absolute rubbish from Atwell there, McNeil went down injured off the pitch and he stops the play.

Somebody has to sort of this catching it and falling onto the floor by keepers it still counts as holding the ball.
According to FIFA the goalkeeper can only hold the ball for 6 seconds otherwise it is an indirect free kick, when is the last time anyone saw this enforced?
 

D

Deleted member 5849

Guest
I know football's irrational but my word I hate Man Utd. I don't care if Man City are owned by murderous tyrants, I wouldn't care if they were a team of Marlon kings, I'd still hope they stuff Man Utd.
 
D

Deleted member 5849

Guest
And on that note I don't get the determination for Everton to go down around these parts. They're a grand old club with a rich history, still (just about) play in a traditional ground... and they're not Liverpool.
 
D

Deleted member 5849

Guest
Mind you, VAR makes for a shit game doesn't it. Don't care how blatant a penalty that is or isn't, the moment's long gone!
 

Nick

Administrator
Slow mo always makes it look worse than it actually is.

I've always been of the opinion that it's ridiculous defenders can get away with things like that so often, big problem of course is next game exactly the same will happen and absolutely nothing will be done about.
Exactly. They need to be consistent.

In the same replay, one of the man city players was holding a man utd player.
 

stupot07

Well-Known Member
The decision was the right one, but shouldn't have taken 3 minutes to review. The issue is the law is so inconsistently upheld, happens on every single set piece in every single game. It if was given more consistently, players would soon stop doing it.

Another example of VAR ruining the game.

Sent from my Pixel 7 using Tapatalk
 

Terry Gibson's perm

Well-Known Member
According to FIFA the goalkeeper can only hold the ball for 6 seconds otherwise it is an indirect free kick, when is the last time anyone saw this enforced?

Not for ages probably when the rule first came out, as like with time lost they do it for a few weeks and then don’t bother.
 

SBT

Well-Known Member
The decision was the right one, but shouldn't have taken 3 minutes to review. The issue is the law is so inconsistently upheld, happens on every single set piece in every single game. It if was given more consistently, players would soon stop doing it.

Another example of VAR ruining the game.

Sent from my Pixel 7 using Tapatalk
If you truly want more consistency from refs, then what you’re really asking for is more video stoppages, that take longer to complete.

It still won’t work, of course, but the modern football fan’s obsession with achieving this mythical/unobtainable standard of perfect refereeing consistency means the alternative is what?
 

SBT

Well-Known Member
The Man City song for Haaland to the tune of Everywhere is easily the worst song in football at the moment, and that is a hotly contested field.
 

Nick

Administrator
If you truly want more consistency from refs, then what you’re really asking for is more video stoppages, that take longer to complete.

It still won’t work, of course, but the modern football fan’s obsession with achieving this mythical/unobtainable standard of perfect refereeing consistency means the alternative is what?
That's not consistency from refs then if it's more video stoppages. When it comes to the pulling in the box the refs always see it, never give it.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top