Okay, can someone please explain the thinking here for those who want Robins out. There seems to be a growing band of posters.
General consensus seems to be that the signings are not good enough (shit, dogshit, L1 standard at best, they're all duds, complete waste of money etc..etc)
Okay, so if that's the true and the signings are all poor, if we sack Robins , aren't we just bringing in another manager to work with these players that aren't good enough?
If they're not good enough, they're not good enough.
And no-one can say the players aren't trying, or Robins has lost the dressing room. There's no sign of that.
Conclusion from so many is that the signings have been poor and the players we have brought in aren't good enough.
So again, if that's the case and the players are not up to scratch, what's the point of replacing Robins.
I get it if it was was now the middle of December and the transfer window to about to open and we were still losing every week.
I don't want him to go anywhere, but if we were thinking of replacing him, surely it would have to be come the end of December.
Then the new manager can bring in some good players to replace all these shit ones we have now