Kitching (12 Viewers)

Forums New posts
C

Cally Fedora

Well-Known Member
Kitching will go straight back in for Binks I think. First half Binks was a bit scatty but was solid 2nd
 
S

SkyBlueSam01

Well-Known Member
I do like Binks but Kitching adds that grit and leadership we miss without Fadz in the team, plus is excellent on the ball

As an aside, Thomas has been criticised for his ball playing, but I think he is one of the best CBs in terms of touch and passing that we have had in years
 
SkyblueDad

SkyblueDad

Well-Known Member
Brighton Sky Blue said:
Thought it was a really good game first half, both teams going aggressively, loads of efforts on goal and pretty end to end. The difference was stamina
Click to expand...
What I liked ‘Boro had their moments thought we handled them well their goal was a decent one to be fair but they were put to the sword professionally.
 
B

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
slowpoke said:
What I liked ‘Boro had their moments thought we handled them well their goal was a decent one to be fair but they were put to the sword professionally.
Click to expand...
Will also say the Boro commentators were the best opposition commentary this season. Really fair and objective despite obviously wanting their side to win.
 
clint van damme

clint van damme

Well-Known Member
slowpoke said:
What I liked ‘Boro had their moments thought we handled them well their goal was a decent one to be fair but they were put to the sword professionally.
Click to expand...

They're a decent outfit, today was a very good result.
We benefitted from them having a bench full of school boys which didnt give Carrick much scope to try and change the game but we've been there ourselves in recent times and it's just one of those things
 
TomRad85

TomRad85

Well-Known Member
Brighton Sky Blue said:
Will also say the Boro commentators were the best opposition commentary this season. Really fair and objective despite obviously wanting their side to win.
Click to expand...
Most aren't that bad. Norwich comms stand out as being cunty but no others are immediately jumping at me.

Sent from my SM-G973F using Tapatalk
 
Hobo

Hobo

Well-Known Member
Brighton Sky Blue said:
The post was made in the first half my Hobo friend
Click to expand...

I know. But I don't think the absence of Kitching was the problem in the first half. We just needed to step it up all across the pitch and play on the front foot more.

I am not taking anything away from Kitching I like him, but Binks is quality too.
 
SkyblueDad

SkyblueDad

Well-Known Member
Hobo said:
I know. But I don't think the absence of Kitching was the problem in the first half. We just needed to step it up all across the pitch and play on the front foot more.

I am not taking anything away from Kitching I like him, but Binks is quality too.
Click to expand...
I really rate Binks, could he play alongside Kitching in a back four ? his passing is superb and accurate.
 
Matt smith

Matt smith

Well-Known Member
slowpoke said:
I really rate Binks, could he play alongside Kitching in a back four ? his passing is superb and accurate.
Click to expand...
Why would you split Thomas and Kitching up?

plus binks is left footed why have 2 left footers

I like binks as an individual player, he’s a good defender at this level, but Kitching is better imo and is a real leader and has a bigger impact on the team
 
Hobo

Hobo

Well-Known Member
Matt smith said:
Why would you split Thomas and Kitching up?

plus binks is left footed why have 2 left footers

I like binks as an individual player, he’s a good defender at this level, but Kitching is better imo and is a real leader and has a bigger impact on the team
Click to expand...

Because Kitching is suspended and now Binks has his chance, that's football. We don't know how Binks will develop with a run of games? It took Kitching a few to get going.

The good thing is we have options in Thomas and Latibeaudiere on right side, then Kitching and Binks on the left. As good as he has been over the years I can't see McFadz getting back in, I see his role as now being one of the subs.
 
SkyblueDad

SkyblueDad

Well-Known Member
Matt smith said:
Why would you split Thomas and Kitching up?

plus binks is left footed why have 2 left footers

I like binks as an individual player, he’s a good defender at this level, but Kitching is better imo and is a real leader and has a bigger impact on the team
Click to expand...
I wouldn’t split Thomas and Kitching up, my question was could Binks play on the left of a back four, basically Bidwells spot.
 
Astute

Astute

Well-Known Member
Hobo said:
Because Kitching is suspended and now Binks has his chance, that's football. We don't know how Binks will develop with a run of games? It took Kitching a few to get going.

The good thing is we have options in Thomas and Latibeaudiere on right side, then Kitching and Binks on the left. As good as he has been over the years I can't see McFadz getting back in, I see his role as now being one of the subs.
Click to expand...
There's no need to change a winning side where all players are doing their part. But if a player comes in who is doing well he should be considered.
 
JSL

JSL

Well-Known Member
Putting Kitching straight back in shows that he can do whatever he likes discipline wise and doesnt bode well. Let us not overlook that he apparently headbutted an opponent (all be it barely noticeable). He should have to work to get back in favour, however good he is
 
COVKIDSNEVERQUIT

COVKIDSNEVERQUIT

Well-Known Member
JSL said:
Putting Kitching straight back in shows that he can do whatever he likes discipline wise and doesnt bode well. Let us not overlook that he apparently headbutted an opponent (all be it barely noticeable). He should have to work to get back in favour, however good he is
Click to expand...

"Headbutted" not according to Mark Robins he didn't and that's all that matters.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 13 (members: 0, guests: 13)
Top