Match Thread Coventry City - Rotherham United FC Match Thread - Tuesday 5th Mar (20 Viewers)

[fatso]

O'Hare can't sell himself unless he is playing.

I think the deal has already been done, and he doesn't need to sell himself as he's available on a free.
And He'll already know who he's playing for next season.

 

---

[fernandopartridge]

Lads we got to the play off final playing 3-5-2 or a variation of it last season, it is not the problem per sē. The reality is we just don't have the players to play 4-3-3 so we need to try and do something else.

Sent from my Pixel 7 using Tapatalk

 

[Viktor17]

I'm very much hoping Eccles RWB is one of my mams todger tugs

That team can play 433 i feel

100% it can - Kelly/eccles hold. Torp 10 then palmer / wright interchanging - then just work hard. Simple.

Interesting re COH.

If we set up as 5, I really do loose faith.

 

[Viktor17]

Lads we got to the play off final playing 3-5-2 or a variation of it last season, it is not the problem per sē. The reality is we just don't have the players to play 4-3-3 so we need to try and do something else.

Sent from my Pixel 7 using Tapatalk

Disagree. It can be 4222 / 4231 / 433 / anything but 5. It’s dated, we look horrifically slow and passive playing it, like we did all season up to Preston.

 

[Offhegoes]

Eccles was superb at Leicester at RWB on the opening game of the season. If this is the formation tonight then I prefer Josh there then Lati.

 

[Essexrobbie]

I think the deal has already been done, and he doesn't need to sell himself as he's available on a free.
And He'll already know who he's playing for next season.

If that's the case and Robins is in on it, I wouldn't let him anywhere near the club again. Let him sit it out somewhere and Id love to get to Wembley just to have him miss out again.

 

[fernandopartridge]

Disagree. It can be 4222 / 4231 / 433 / anything but 5. It’s dated, we look horrifically slow and passive playing it, like we did all season up to Preston.

4222 was dreadful at West Brom, does not work with O'Hare and Palmer occupying the same space

4231 does not work with the players available





Sent from my Pixel 7 using Tapatalk

 

[sneferu]

4-3-3 on BBC. Not that that means much.

 

[fernandopartridge]

If that's the case and Robins is in on it, I wouldn't let him anywhere near the club again. Let him sit it out somewhere and Id love to get to Wembley just to have him miss out again.

Oh give it a rest man, if he's here and we are paying him then he plays, end of. It is silly not to use a player that you are paying

Sent from my Pixel 7 using Tapatalk

 

[Sky_Blue_Dreamer]

Maybe MR has chosen that team because it has the personnel to switch from 3ATB to a back 4.

 

[Sky_Blue_Dreamer]

I'm very much hoping Eccles RWB is one of my mams todger tugs

That team can play 433 i feel

Does your mam tug todgers often?

 

[Viktor17]

4222 was dreadful at West Brom, does not work with O'Hare and Palmer occupying the same space

4231 does not work with the players available





Sent from my Pixel 7 using Tapatalk

it does - its just Palmer for Tats. It's about mindset - that's down to robins and adi.

It was 3 at back and WBA - it was horrid. Its had its day.

 

[Viktor17]

If that's the case and Robins is in on it, I wouldn't let him anywhere near the club again. Let him sit it out somewhere and Id love to get to Wembley just to have him miss out again.

It's got that vibe hasn't it.........various bits starting to add up.

 

[Nick]

If Eccles rwb then mve will come on for Kelly and Eccles into midfield. 62nd minute

 

[blunted]

To quote the modern day philosophers of Fun Boy Three and Bananarama;


It ain't what you do, it's the way that you do it
And that's what gets results

Have a bit of decorum first recorded by Harry James, Jimmy Lunceford and Ella Fitzgerald. A jazz standard and a much better version.

 

[Dickie]

I think the deal has already been done, and he doesn't need to sell himself as he's available on a free.
And He'll already know who he's playing for next season.

Sheffield United

 

[Tommo1993]

the award for the least supportive post by somebody claiming to be a supporter goes to...

Ooooh, sorry Positive Pants.

 

[Earlsdon_Skyblue1]

100% it can. Lati at RB, Torp AM, Palmer RW... its not completely ideal obviously but its far better than the alternative.

Sent from my SM-G973F using Tapatalk

It is better than the alternative, but those cucking for a back 5 will probably feel vindicated when we win, as it's Rotherham we are playing who could frankly be beaten with five men playing a 5-a-side diamond formation.

 

[fernandopartridge]

It is better than the alternative, but those cucking for a back 5 will probably feel vindicated when we win, as it's Rotherham we are playing who could frankly be beaten with five men playing a 5-a-side diamond formation.

Using the same logic playing 4-3-3 tonight is no conclusive proof of anything either

Sent from my Pixel 7 using Tapatalk

 

[SeaSeeEffCee]

Could potentially be a diamond, no? Kelly at the base and Palmer at the tip with Eccles and Torp in the middle?

 

[Earlsdon_Skyblue1]

Using the same logic playing 4-3-3 tonight is no conclusive proof of anything either

Sent from my Pixel 7 using Tapatalk

If you wanted to ignore the rest of this season then sure.

 

[mark82]

I'm very much hoping Eccles RWB is one of my mams todger tugs

That team can play 433 i feel

Your Mam does what?

 

[fatso]

If that's the case and Robins is in on it, I wouldn't let him anywhere near the club again. Let him sit it out somewhere and Id love to get to Wembley just to have him miss out again.

I doubt if he'd be overly bothered tbf.

He's happy counting his dosh!

 

[shepardo01]

We'll play a cobbled together 3/5/2 and win tonight - Robins will think it's ok, do the same against Watford who are struggling for confidence - we'll sit off them instead of getting at them early on - be two down after 25 mins, he'll change it back on 70 and we'll lose 3-1.

 

[Nick]

Might be looking into it too much but ohare is warming up on his own. Just stood on his own doing volleys.

 

[covcity4life]

If you wanted to ignore the rest of this season then sure.

Whilst you ignore last year? And league 1?

 

[skyblueelephant76]

Could potentially be a diamond, no? Kelly at the base and Palmer at the tip with Eccles and Torp in the middle?

It's 3 at the back, you can see from the warm up

 

[covcity4life]

We'll play a cobbled together 3/5/2 and win tonight - Robins will think it's ok, do the same against Watford who are struggling for confidence - we'll sit off them instead of getting at them early on - be two down after 25 mins, he'll change it back on 70 and we'll lose 3-1.

Do you think he should be sacked? Serious question

 

[shepardo01]

Do you think he should be sacked? Serious question

Short answer, no. Lots to say on why - but not time now at the match.

 

[Nick]

Now he's not

 

[shepardo01]

Got a feeling that this might be a 3/5/2 when out of possession - then he'll move Eccles up to be part of a 3 when in possession??? (If it is to be believed that Eccles is RWB)
He clearly hasn't got confidence in our defence - admitted it after the Preston game.
It needs good discipline and hard work to do this.

 

[Viktor17]

People referencing 532 last season as a marker: We had a freak up front, which meant we could just go back to front with out any care on quality of ball because he would just get hold of it and more often than not get something. Then we had a midfielder who basically played as a 6/8/10 and was so dynamic in last 3/4 months. That hid a lot of flaws.

We no longer have those 2 players. The change to 433/4321 this year showcased our players in there best light, we looked dynamic and full of excitement during our good run. One man should not change that, yes its not ideal, but the alternative is frankly horrid - as Friday showed.

 

[ccfcchris]

There'll be a massive meltdown tonight if we don't win.

 

[Nick]

There'll be a massive meltdown tonight if we don't win.

Justified ?

 

[Earlsdon_Skyblue1]

Whilst you ignore last year? And league 1?

You're right actually.

In fact, we should play exactly how we did back in 1923.