Whoops (4 Viewers)
- Thread starter Briles
- Start date
But not photographed /recorded?
bigfatronssba
Well-Known Member
The camera has just evidenced it.
If the person in question hadn’t photographed it, and instead just wrote on twitter what it said, would that have been any different?
SleepyGinger
Well-Known Member
I know people are saying it won’t have any affect on the game but they are talking about exploiting the space left by the attackers not tracking back. I imagine this will affect how they set up now. Nothing we can do now but it’s not ideal. Be interesting to see what Robins says about it all.
MatthewWallis
Well-Known Member
Don’t really see the big deal with it all. Nothing that was said was even bad. The only slight thing wrong is someone having their font at size 100
And MR's avatar!🫣
mmttww
Well-Known Member
Briles
Well-Known Member
absolutely. Hoedt to be benched as a result which ronins secretly wanted. It’s absolutely genius
While also getting one over on fan's of places like this pretty genius that!🫣
Flying Fokker
Well-Known Member
Skyblue Bangkok
Well-Known Member
What legal action could he take ? He should think about what he wrote and he's given Watford a motivational Leo talk already.
Flying Fokker
Well-Known Member
The person that took the photo deserves some come.back. Clear intention to pry and record personal data. The city employee that sent the message needs to get his act together.
The club seems to be weak on data protection and confidentiality. They do of course ‘leak’ info themselves.
Skyblue Bangkok
Well-Known Member
Good
Luck in trying to get legal action on that .
Torquay Sky Blue
Well-Known Member
Did he have his Cov jacket on? Fair play to the person who took the pic for realising who he is
shmmeee
Well-Known Member
Distribution of private data should be quite straightforward TBF. The evidence is all over Twitter.
Speedies_Chips
Well-Known Member
What personal data do you see there??
shmmeee
Well-Known Member
Someone’s private messages.
Would you be OK if Nick leaked all that Tim Fisher erotica you send on here?
Speedies_Chips
Well-Known Member
That's not what personal data is.
shmmeee
Well-Known Member
It absolutely is. It’s data linked to a named individual containing information about them.
David O'Day
Well-Known Member
Having been on about a billion GDPR courses the fact it is linked to an name that makes it possible to identify the person makes it private data.
Speedies_Chips
Well-Known Member
That would make any newspaper article on anybody a breach.
David O'Day
Well-Known Member
No, no it wouldn't and newspaper articles still have to weigh the privacy rights of an individual vs. the public interest aspect.
Flying Fokker
Well-Known Member
Speedies_chips needs to go on one of those courses. It’s fairly straightforward stuff. Even numbers / nicknames are data. Pictures may be or inference to who they concern is all relevant.
Speedies_Chips
Well-Known Member
Stop writing my username on here or I'll sue you.
bigfatronssba
Well-Known Member
Looking at something on display in public is not prying.
David O'Day
Well-Known Member
no but photographing it and then distributing can be an offence
Johnnythespider
Well-Known Member
Has anyone on here got the blue ticks switched off on their WhatsApp messages? Just seems a bit odd to me
Seaside-Skyblue
Well-Known Member
I don't now but I've done it in the past...I used to feel pressured into responding to people within a certain timeframe, particularly knowing they knew I had seen the message. Turning it off while I had that mindset was actually quite a relief.
Sent from my SM-A346B using Tapatalk
Probably! Not.Stop writing my username on here or I'll sue you.