No I don’t. I cynically see this as way of killing off any competitiveness at all and protecting elite clubs
I don’t get this argument.
Without FFP Arsenal would’ve been able to buy a striker in January (probably an Osimhen or Toney) to help their title challenge yet couldn’t make the accounting work to do so. This also seems to be the case for Man Utd, who could’ve strengthened if not having to meet financial targets. Since the the FFP/PSR rules have come in we’ve seen way more teams competing regularly for the top 6-8 places.
We now have Villa, Brighton, West Ham, Wolves and even Brentford in recent years regularly competing for places that used to be way more of a closed shop (Leicester also spent several years challenging for these places before they fucked themselves buying average players on massive contracts/sticking with a failing manager too long - they’d probably still be around here if their ownership was more competent).
In the same time we’ve had Arsenal spend numerous seasons as low as 7th and 8th and look way off the top 4 teams, Chelsea have now spent a couple of years in the European wilderness with no hope of looking like returning any time soon(whilst also sure to be found foul of FFP/PSR). Man Utd have also at times been slumming it competing teams around 7-10th.
If FFP was brought in to cement these clubs’ place in the top 4/6, it’s done a terrible job. The top 8 places was way more predictable before FFP.