TomRad85
Well-Known Member
You're very upset with anyone who disagrees with you this. I think many on here are acting absolutely ridiculously. You keep telling yourself you aren't if it helps.Keep telling yourself that
You're very upset with anyone who disagrees with you this. I think many on here are acting absolutely ridiculously. You keep telling yourself you aren't if it helps.Keep telling yourself that
I vote David to go with Pete.He has a point, i'd like to know what happens next as no amount of emotion is going change what has happened.
We'll never know that if people just going screaming and shoutingIt will be staged managed nonsense to make people feel better about themselves
It'll be like a cross between a trial and wake if people on this thread get their way.We'll never know that if people just going screaming and shouting
We'll never know that if people just going screaming and shouting
No but this is a thread about the supporters meeting and you have just gone off on someone for basically saying they want questions at said forum to be asked about future plans.People venting on a message board doesn't mean it will translate to shouting and screaming at the forum.
I'd be amazed if it did
It'll be like a cross between a trial and wake if people on this thread get their way.
I've already told the kind of thing I'd rather know. Ignore it for some back slaps though.Fair play mate, I’ll ask him what his favourite colour tie is instead
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I've already told the kind of thing I'd rather know. Ignore it for some back slaps though.
As I said we don't need another Pete, genuinely would send David so we get a variety.
Are we sure he doesn't know who he wants?It’s not like we have years of these events with Tim Fisher to know how they work and what happens when you start ranting or asking questions to which you will clearly be met with a straight bat.
I do want to know why he’s timed this 2 days before a game going into a 2 week break but doesn’t know who he wants as a replacement.
That’s how it looksAre we sure he doesn't know who he wants?
No but this is a thread about the supporters meeting and you have just gone off on someone for basically saying they want questions at said forum to be asked about future plans.
at the forum, not emotional at the forumI went off because he went on about not being emotional.
He's not the first one. I find it a very weird take. Football an emotional game, for some of us anyway.
But I suppose that's the (Sky) era we live in.
That’s how we’ve been told it looks.That’s how it looks
Yes yes it's the Sky era. There's more than one emotion. Getting pissed off with constantly losing is one of then.I went off because he went on about not being emotional.
He's not the first one. I find it a very weird take. Football an emotional game, for some of us anyway.
But I suppose that's the (Sky) era we live in.
at the forum, not emotional at the forum
I guess I'll just have to hope one of them has an interest in the future of the club then. I'd rather the balance was coming from forum representatives though.I’m sure there will be more than 2 people asking questions
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Yes yes it's the Sky era. There's more than one emotion. Getting pissed off with constantly losing is one of then.
Excitement looking forward is another.
OK mate. You win, your 'side' is having a totally normal one.Who doesn't get pissed off when we lose.
But sometimes it goes with the territory unless you support a select band of clubs.
More Sky era thinking.
Me?Maybe we need someone slightly less emotional than Pete not just another Pete.
OK mate. You win, your 'side' is having a totally normal one.
It’s also how the statement readsThat’s how we’ve been told it looks.
OK good, so is mine. We disagree, it's allowed.My side is Coventry City.
There is every need to say on a thread about the supporters forum where people were wanting over emotional questions at said forumNo, I agree. But there's no need to really say it, I'm not sure what the clowns who do say it are trying to prove.
Though equally anyone who thinks the forum is going to be a candid reveal of what's going on behind the scenes is delusional.
Precisely, that’s how they told us.It’s also how the statement reads
I have no emotion when it comes to speaking up for our forum and taking responsibility for pointing out issues and challenges and seeking to communicate those
I do have to agree on the point about suggesting boycotts at the start of games.With respect you aren’t speaking for the forum. You are shooting from the hip and not being very rational.
I do have to agree on the point about suggesting boycotts at the start of games.
I agree with you though the owner explaining the decision he’s made is still important, we haven’t sacked a manager in a very long time so it’s not a trivial event.Whatever people think the decision isn’t changing it’s happened. Only time will tell if it’s the right one or not. The club is the thing that unites the supporters not the owner m, the manager or even the players they all move on.
I don't think people should go. Actions speak louder than words and his have shown us what he's about. Don't talk to him he's not one of us, he'll divide us more when people fall for his polished crap 'answers'. Don't give the egomaniac his thrill. Voice your frustrations in the stands and through your wallets. It's bait to make us look reactionary and him calm and all knowing . Leaving it a week in the hope we'll relax shows what a coward that oddball is.
I do have to agree on the point about suggesting boycotts at the start of games.
I think it’s a bad decision that wasn’t handled very well. At the same time if we start organising boycotts and mass protests over a manager who isn’t coming back, this will turn into a car crash of a season.It's pathetic, let's face it.
People are having a competition to see who can be angriest online.