clint van damme
Well-Known Member
Our best player lol. Was at fault for the first when yet again the ball was passed inside him. Gave the ball to Hamer for the second.
But apart from that.....
Our best player lol. Was at fault for the first when yet again the ball was passed inside him. Gave the ball to Hamer for the second.
When he played for Peterborough on the right, he was poor. Their chairman spoke about it on a podcast the other day.Best game so far. But he has looked poor on both flanks for us. I don't get this he has been played out of position when he played on both flanks for Peterborough. Also how can a naturally right footed player be out of position on the right.
He just needs time to step up to this level.
Where was that from?I think it was even more impressive a performance than it seemed at the time today.
The more I think about it, the more it felt like we were playing with 11 men all game and not a man down, didn't it
View attachment 39706
Is this a piss take?Thought Da Silva our best player today, can't believe some of the scores.
Nobody had a bad game really from the starting 11.
Hamer played some lovely passes, but didn't really get hold of the game, and O'hare was largely Ineffective.Hamer 5 - not the dominating player he used to be
O'Hare 2 - Just ambles about the pitch. Except on odd occasions like Leicester last season, not the same since his injury
Didn’t Hamer make both their goals ?Hamer 5 - not the dominating player he used to be
O'Hare 2 - Just ambles about the pitch. Except on odd occasions like Leicester last season, not the same since his injury
Yes you're right. I think as he was taken off I had forgotten how he played. Totally forgot about his assist.Eccles 6?
I thought he was very good today and played some cracking through balls and that cross was a thing of beauty.
He was everywhere
Ffs, Dasilva got caught out for the first goal AND failed to cut out the cross. And gave the ball away in the move that resulted in the second goal. Other than that his hair looked lovely.I thought Sheaf ran the game today. Like others said, nobody had a bad game and I thiught Dasilva was half decent. He Certainly pushed forwards most of the game.
Collins 6
Could have made himself bigger for their second, other than that ok.
Lati 7
Getting better at imposing himself. Need him to be a bit more “in their grill”.
Thomas 8
Plus one for goal.
Binks 6
Got caught wrong side again for one of their goals.
Van Ewijk 7
Up and down that wing well and good last man cover to stop potential breakaways from set pieces.
Dasilva 7
Busy, but needs to put that ball in quicker.
Sheaf 7
Someone needs to remind him that he has the ability to place a ball that few possess. Shoot more man - pass backwards less when near their D
Eccles 7
In amongst it. A few great long balls.
Torp 7
Unlucky not to secure with the header - got involved well
Rudoni 7
Not too shabby.
Psycho Hound 9
Has a touch of the Craig Bellamys about him. We need to let him have a bit of a free role.
subs
Timely.
Saka 7
Mason-Clarke 5
Simms 6
Thomas Asante 7
Bidwell 6
Yeah this is stop on today, thought collins was at least a 6, he barely touched the ball in the second halfCollins 5
Van Erwijk 7
Latibeudiere 6
Thomas 8
Binks 7
DaSilva 7
Eccles 7
Sheaf 7
Rudoni 7
Bassette 9
Torp 7
Thomas-Asante 6
Mason-Clark 7
Sakamoto 7
Bidwell NA
Simms NA
You rated Sakamoto the same as Simms and Asante Thomas?
6/10 postTo be fair, and I never get involved in ratings threads. I see a rating purely as an individual rating, bearing no relation to any other players performance.
Not sure what others think. I would start with a base of 5 as well and anything above is a half decent game. Basically why I don’t get involved. It’s a load of nonsense really.
Mad Dog.Psycho hound lol
Let's be honest for some on here - it's a weekly chance for some of the usual suspects to put the boot into players they have a bias against.To be fair, and I never get involved in ratings threads. I see a rating purely as an individual rating, bearing no relation to any other players performance.
Not sure what others think. I would start with a base of 5 as well and anything above is a half decent game. Basically why I don’t get involved. It’s a load of nonsense really.
He assisted the second goal and his through-ball to set up (player name here) to assist the first was excellent.Hamer played some lovely passes, but didn't really get hold of the game, and O'hare was largely Ineffective.
Hamer is the one midfield player we've really struggled to replace, I can't blame him for moving on, but im sure he's better than Sheff utd and should still be in the Premier league.He assisted the second goal and his through-ball to set up (player name here) to assist the first was excellent.
Personally, furore aside about clapping him, it was a monumental fuck up to not give Gus what he was asking for and tie him down to another contract. Not only do we miss his presence and quality (as I’m sure you’ll agree) but we just simply haven’t replaced him.
Not sure if this is unpopular, but if we ever had the chance to have him back, I’d be over the moon.
O’Hare can jog on, however.
BBC websiteWhere was that from?
Couple of Eccles balls today were beautiful.
Only if you want to get sued!Not Johnson and Johnson Talc tho!!!!!
I thought Sheaf ran the game today. Like others said, nobody had a bad game and I thiught Dasilva was half decent. He Certainly pushed forwards most of the game.
Dis temper!Mad Dog.
Let's be honest for some on here - it's a weekly chance for some of the usual suspects to put the boot into players they have a bias against.
Balance doesn't come into it - I swear some on here want certain players to fail to be seen as right in their 'internet view.'
Bidwell was bad when he came on but he did only come on in the 88th minute and the keeper wasted at least half of the 6 mins added time. The ball was probably only in play for about 4 minutes whilst he was on the pitch.I agree. I thought Dasilva was good today. Attacking options down the left were much poorer once Bidwell came on.
Horribly wrong.I agree. I thought Dasilva was good today. Attacking options down the left were much poorer once Bidwell came on.
Horribly wrong.
Yep. The siilest thing is the way the result influences the individual ratings. If Thomas had hit the post instead of scoring the equaliser, every single player's rating would have dropped by a couple of points, without there being any difference in their performance.To be fair, and I never get involved in ratings threads. I see a rating purely as an individual rating, bearing no relation to any other players performance.
Not sure what others think. I would start with a base of 5 as well and anything above is a half decent game. Basically why I don’t get involved. It’s a load of nonsense really.
That was funnyNot a Coventry player but I can't remember seeing a player have a worse half than Sheff Utd's number 38 Seriki who came on at half time. His 1st couple of involvements he looked more like a WWF wrestler than a footballer, he did very little else except get shouted at by the number 42 and to top it off in added on time he went to clear the ball, kicked it with his standing foot and fell over. He looked liked he was a competition winner