World Cup 2034 (11 Viewers)

clint van damme

Well-Known Member
It's not just about money and corruption, which Infantino said he would put a stop to when he was running for the presidency, it is about the human rights abuses, including in relation to LGBT people and women, as well as the complete ignoring of fossil fuels' contribution to the climate crisis.
I'm not sure there are too many gay/trans rights issues in USA for the 2026 tournament

Anyone kicking off about them holding a football tournament who hasnt uttered a word about them killing Yemenis in their thousands needs to take their moral compass in for a service.
 

wingy

Well-Known Member
Anyone kicking off about them holding a football tournament who hasnt uttered a word about them killing Yemenis in their thousands needs to take their moral compass in for a service.
But it's okay as Israel,supported by the West can do as it wishes also and partake in world event's,there is no moral conpass to any of it , I wonder when they get to hold it, they can come under the European banner or the American's also,no?
 

fatso

Well-Known Member
I think it makes campaigns for LGBT equality in the game more important than ever.

A boycott of this tournament in the name of gay and trans rights would be laudable. I also think if you’re keen to make a fuss about gay and trans rights and human rights abuses for this tournament, then you should consider doing the same for the one in 2026. And maybe speaking up for them at home too.
Tbh I'd just like to watch football for the love of football, without politics getting involved, football should be about 90 minutes of self indulgence, of passion and enjoyment/heart break, can't we just have a 90 minute window without politics or religion or whatever poking it's nose in?

Also, (call me an old fart) but I wish they'd get rid of VAR as well, takes way too long and pisses too many people off.
 
Last edited:

SBT

Well-Known Member
Tbh I'd just like to watch football for the love of football, without politics getting involved, football should be about 90 minutes of self indulgence, of passion and enjoyment/heart break, can't we just have a 90 minute window without politics or religion or whatever poking it's nose in?
I mean, fair enough if that is your stance (the Saudi World Cup will be delighted to accommodate people like you), but you were the one banging on about hypocrisy and human rights!
 

fatso

Well-Known Member
I mean, fair enough if that is your stance (the Saudi World Cup will be delighted to accommodate people like you), but you were the one banging on about hypocrisy and human rights!
Not sure what you meant by "people like you"
Do you mean that anyone who just wants to watch a football match is automatically a supporter of tyrannical regimes and wants to see human rights violations?

I thought I'd already said that the Saudi world cup was hypocrisy and just about money!

What I'd like to see is the world cup held in any of the numerous countries that are already fully engaged with the sport.
Why not somewhere in Europe, or Australia (in their winter) or South America.
Anywhere where the football infrastructure already exists, and players won't die of heat.
 

SBT

Well-Known Member
Not sure what you meant by "people like you"
Do you mean that anyone who just wants to watch a football match is automatically a supporter of tyrannical regimes and wants to see human rights violations?

I thought I'd already said that the Saudi world cup was hypocrisy and just about money!

What I'd like to see is the world cup held in any of the numerous countries that are already fully engaged with the sport.
Why not somewhere in Europe, or Australia (in their winter) or South America.
Anywhere where the football infrastructure already exists, and players won't die of heat.
I mean if you just want to watch football without any political subtext bubbling underneath then you can bet your bottom riyal that Saudi Arabia will do everything they can to make sure no-one is thinking or talking about politics, LGBT issues or human rights abuses (just like Qatar did). They are very much aligned with you on that one.

What's the fascination with Australia? Football is maybe the third most popular sport there at best.
 

Sky_Blue_Dreamer

Well-Known Member
I mean if you just want to watch football without any political subtext bubbling underneath then you can bet your bottom riyal that Saudi Arabia will do everything they can to make sure no-one is thinking or talking about politics, LGBT issues or human rights abuses (just like Qatar did). They are very much aligned with you on that one.

What's the fascination with Australia? Football is maybe the third most popular sport there at best.
So shouldnt' it go to Australia to help grow the game there then?
 

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
I mean if you just want to watch football without any political subtext bubbling underneath then you can bet your bottom riyal that Saudi Arabia will do everything they can to make sure no-one is thinking or talking about politics, LGBT issues or human rights abuses (just like Qatar did). They are very much aligned with you on that one.

What's the fascination with Australia? Football is maybe the third most popular sport there at best.
Big stadia
Infrastructure in place
Relatively successful national team
Growing fan base
Never held the tournament in Oceania

etc etc
 

SBT

Well-Known Member
Big stadia
Infrastructure in place
Relatively successful national team
Growing fan base
Never held the tournament in Oceania

etc etc
Australians don't really care about football - A-League attendances are pitiful, and smaller than they were 10 years ago. Most would rather be watching Aussie rules or rugby.

If you care that much about Oceania getting a turn why not give it to Indonesia? Bigger population, more interest in football, and more large football-specific stadia than Australia. Better timezone for European TV markets too. Infrastructure definitely not as good, and wouldn't be as lucrative as an Australia tournament - but the point is to grow the game, isn't it?
 

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
Australians don't really care about football - A-League attendances are pitiful, and smaller than they were 10 years ago. Most would rather be watching Aussie rules or rugby.

If you care that much about Oceania getting a turn why not give it to Indonesia? Bigger population, more interest in football, and more large football-specific stadia than Australia. Better timezone for European TV markets too. Infrastructure definitely not as good, and wouldn't be as lucrative as an Australia tournament - but the point is to grow the game, isn't it?
I just mentioned Australia as they’d bid for it more recently.
 

SkyBlueMatt

Well-Known Member
I don't know about you but I'm quite looking forward to it.

Up next Afghanistan 2038, North Korea 2042 then Israel 2046 (they should have murdered all the Palestinians by then).
 

tisza

Well-Known Member
Football was growing in popularity in those countries. Similarly it has been in Australia for a long time.

Qatar demolished the stadia straight after the tournament. Not even a pretence of growing the game there.
Qatar has a population of around 3 million - 90 % are expats. Notions of growing the game there were always laughable.
It's all about filling FIFAs and its officials' pockets. For all furore over Blatter his replacement is no better.
 

Nick

Administrator
I don’t see why bullshit attitudes in other countries mean we can’t work to improve attitudes in our own.

My point is the "football is for everybody", "no exclusions" etc.

Next minute "By the way, world cup is in this country. Dont be gay here as the maximum sentence is the death penalty.
 

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
My point is the "football is for everybody", "no exclusions" etc.

Next minute "By the way, world cup is in this country. Dont be gay here as the maximum sentence is the death penalty.
Renouncing Islam while there is also not to be advised
 

wingy

Well-Known Member
My point is the "football is for everybody", "no exclusions" etc.

Next minute "By the way, world cup is in this country. Dont be gay here as the maximum sentence is the death penalty.
World body seems different to national bodies,or intercontinental bodies or is it?
 

SBT

Well-Known Member
My point is the "football is for everybody", "no exclusions" etc.

Next minute "By the way, world cup is in this country. Dont be gay here as the maximum sentence is the death penalty.
So the alternative is what? Just give up on trying to improve the situation in our own country?
 

David O'Day

Well-Known Member
Not sure what you meant by "people like you"
Do you mean that anyone who just wants to watch a football match is automatically a supporter of tyrannical regimes and wants to see human rights violations?

I thought I'd already said that the Saudi world cup was hypocrisy and just about money!

What I'd like to see is the world cup held in any of the numerous countries that are already fully engaged with the sport.
Why not somewhere in Europe, or Australia (in their winter) or South America.
Anywhere where the football infrastructure already exists, and players won't die of heat.
no, he means thick people
 

SBT

Well-Known Member
Damn site more chance of growing football there than Saudi.
The A-League attendances would suggest otherwise. That’s not a knock on Australia, they just prefer other sports, always have.

That’s not the case in Saudi, where football is the top sport by far. Clearly the amount of money going into the game and other sports in Saudi Arabia suggests that the government there sees potential. Personally I’m not sure, but you yourself have said in the past that it’s a strategy which seems to be garnering success, so I’m surprised you seem to have turned on it now.
 

SBT

Well-Known Member
Having the previous winners hosting it would be a decent idea.
I thought we wanted England to host it one day?

Clearly there are problems with countries (other than awful ones) being reluctant to host, but my personal preference would be to spread the tournament to as many different countries in as many parts of the world as possible. Would require some compromises from all stakeholders (fans included), but you could surely ease some of the rules about stadia etc and allow someone other than wealthy western countries and sinister petrostates a chance to host. Make it a truly global game.
 

Gynnsthetonic

Well-Known Member
Its rigged. FIFA gave applicants 28 days to bid for the event. Australia therefore withdrew.

The stadiums in Saudi are not even built yet.
A real shame, a World Cup in Australia/New Zealand should of been given instead of Qatar. All the infrastructure already there stadiums transport etc. Money talks, Saudi one of the last places on earth I'd want to visit.
 

Gynnsthetonic

Well-Known Member
Australians don't really care about football - A-League attendances are pitiful, and smaller than they were 10 years ago. Most would rather be watching Aussie rules or rugby.

If you care that much about Oceania getting a turn why not give it to Indonesia? Bigger population, more interest in football, and more large football-specific stadia than Australia. Better timezone for European TV markets too. Infrastructure definitely not as good, and wouldn't be as lucrative as an Australia tournament - but the point is to grow the game, isn't it?
Indonesia and Malaysia another good shout, not some desert hell hole.
 

CJ_covblaze

Well-Known Member
Big stadia
Infrastructure in place
Relatively successful national team
Growing fan base
Never held the tournament in Oceania

etc etc
Australia only have three suitable stadiums over the 40,000 seat threshold. Nothing to say they can't build more. Russia, Qatar, Brazil, South Africa, Japan, South Korea, Germany and France all did that and Saudi are already building theirs now (almost like they knew isn't it!) but with the quick turnaround/stitch up with the bidding process understandably they couldn't commit to doing that. With the 48 team format more are needed than ever before so sadly very few countries can now host on their own.
 

SBT

Well-Known Member
With the 48 team format more are needed than ever before so sadly very few countries can now host on their own.
It’s a stupid rule with the stadium capacity thing. No reason why a country should have to build loads of huge new stadia just to meet it. Should be able to build temporary structures, so long as security and crowd safety is taken care of then it shouldn’t really matter if the capacity isn’t huge.
 

Liquid Gold

Well-Known Member
The Euros is better than the World Cup these days anyway. At least they’re held in proper sporting nations. Not petro states in the winter or over 7 countries.
 

SBT

Well-Known Member
The Euros is better than the World Cup these days anyway. At least they’re held in proper sporting nations. Not petro states in the winter or over 7 countries.
Of the nine Euros tournaments held/scheduled this century, only three of them have had only one host country.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top