Rent - Want the best for CCFC = quick agreement (1 Viewer)
- Thread starter dongonzalos
- Start date
lordsummerisle
Well-Known Member
We should make you Chairman, you could then have sold Dunn and Hussey in a joblot for about £5million.
dongonzalos
Well-Known Member
I am thinking too simplistic about this, if you include match day costs then you have to include match day revenue streams from sponsors television and tickets.
Also consider that all of this is down as SISU ran their business badly over the last 5 years particularly last year.
Surely if SISU are having to throw in other figures to cloud the issue then 400k is a reasonable offer.
Otherwise they would just be able to say it is not a reasonable offer.
torchomatic
Well-Known Member
I think both parties are clouding the issue by using incomparable figures.
And if the figures aren't comparable we cannot really say if any offer is reasonable or not.
dongonzalos
Well-Known Member
I think you can only do tat by focusing purely on the issue at hand the rent.
1.28 million as t currently stands
SISU want it at 200k
ACL offered. 650 now 400k
They say any lower they don't function.
TrueSkyBlueLiam
Member
Wigan, Blackburn, theres a lot more. Those are just without thinking
TrueSkyBlueLiam
Member
As far as im concerned, i dont care about the ins and outs of the deal. ACL and SISU can bitch about eachother all they want. Aslong as they sort out a deal i dont care
torchomatic
Well-Known Member
Premier League Wigan? Parachute payment Blackburn? OK, please let me know how much rent they pay annually please.
lordsummerisle
Well-Known Member
When he said "without thinking", he really meant it.
shmmeee
Well-Known Member
Why? Surely it's like when I rented my wedding venue. I didn't pay staff or utilities or anything like that, I just paid the rent for the day to cover that.
The venue has no claim on anything I do in that venue (eg sell food or charge for car parking).
Surely any rent should include match day costs otherwise its just free money for ACL.
Also, although I see the accusation of Sisu running the club badly, I never see the justification. We've been in decline for a decade before they came along. Seems to me it's only Sisu that put a stop to the rot. The decisions haven't been fun and we can argue about the proper way to do things. Hit nothing point to incompetence from Sisu over the 5 years. The only person I'd happily apply that label to is KD. The others seem to have been doing what needs to be done in a fairly decent manner.
Sorry if this comes across as confrontational, I genuinely want to know how specifically has the club "badly run" in the last five years. And more to the point what a "well run" club would have done differently. Seems that a lot of people don't like fairly reasonable business decisions but that's not the same thing as incompetence.