Ricoh was right Decision (1 Viewer)

[dongonzalos]

Even the leader of the opposition today has come out in Telegraph defending the decision.

Stating no council money will be subsidised to ACL or SISU.

SISU must pay back their debt.

No council jobs will be affected as a result of this decision.

This from a man who has a lot to gain from criticising the decision. If it was wrong.

 

---

[hutch1972]

Even the leader of the opposition today has come out in Telegraph defending the decision.

Stating no council money will be subsidised to ACL or SISU.

SISU must pay back their debt.

No council jobs will be affected as a result of this decision.

This from a man who has a lot to gain from criticising the decision. If it was wrong.

We will never find out if jobs were affected by this decision , they will use other circumstances to smooth over funding cuts and job losses . I dont trust this council,never have and probably never will !!

 

[skyblueinBaku]

Why has he suddenly said this? Has the Ricoh row started again?

 

[Otis]

Thought every row in the Ricoh is filled for next week isn't it. There should be no rows to be had.

 

[dongonzalos]

Why has he suddenly said this? Has the Ricoh row started again?

No he wrote into the telegraph as some ex councillor questioned the decision.

So even as the opposition leader he was saying it is the right call.

 

[dongonzalos]

We will never find out if jobs were affected by this decision , they will use other circumstances to smooth over funding cuts and job losses . I dont trust this council,never have and probably never will !!

This is the leader of the opposition he does not need to smooth it over.

It would be his job to exploit it if that was happening.

 

[skyblueinBaku]

No he wrote into the telegraph as some ex councillor questioned the decision.

So even as the opposition leader he was saying it is the right call.

Thanks, Don. I thought it had all kicked off again.

 

[lordsummerisle]

This is the leader of the opposition he does not need to smooth it over.

It would be his job to exploit it if that was happening.[/QUO

Would that be the leader of a Tory opposition who's government is the instigator of the cuts anyway?

 

[Ashdown1]

The hedge fund needs to cough up all or at least a significant part of what they owe, simple really.

 

[hutch1972]

This is the leader of the opposition he does not need to smooth it over.

It would be his job to exploit it if that was happening.

Your right ! , but he and the 11 other tories voted in agreement with the deal.

 

[dongonzalos]

Is it 100% definite we can 't go into admin or transfer embargo's over not paying our rent.

 

[skyblueman]

Is it 100% definite we can 't go into admin or transfer embargo's over not paying our rent.

Nope - could go into Admin at any time if SISU decide not to put cash in to cover the losses - not just the rent issue that's only part of the problem I'm afraid - has gone very quiet on this front

 

[dongonzalos]

Nope - could go into Admin at any time if SISU decide not to put cash in to cover the losses - not just the rent issue that's only part of the problem I'm afraid - has gone very quiet on this front

TF spoke in the telegraph today first time in weeks.

Only a couple if lines saying he wished all the money from the sell out went to them but it doesn't and that they knew the rules when they entered.

 

[dongonzalos]

Your right ! , but he and the 11 other tories voted in agreement with the deal.

Yes I get your point.

However to vote for it unanimously. When you are the opposition and you have a chance to score brownie points by attacking it. Speaks volumes to me.

It also says to me when people are criticising it suggesting it is costing money or jobs, then this is a fallacy.