Don't worry. We lose two in a row and he'll be back.
It's ridiculous to be honest. People like this can wait until any sequence of events support their comments and then say 'told you so.'
Of course, when the sequence of events doesn't support, they can simply melt back into the background.
Look at the whole sequence of events en masse and it is quite clear that their stance just doesn't stack up. But if they wait until a small sequence occurs that does back up their stance they'll jump all up and down over it and by nature itself, you can nearly always find little pockets of results or sequences that momentarily 'prove' you are right.
It's like saying Leon Clarke is shit and then just sitting waiting in the background until he has one bad game and misses a hatful of chances, to prove your point. And will all do know that there will indeed probably be one single game in which Leon Clarke does indeed miss a hatful of chances at some stage.
This does not make him shit. You have to look at the whole picture otherwise the viewpoint is a complete joke.