We have to pay acl £24m for revenue rights (1 Viewer)

[Jack Griffin]

Nelllist lost his seat in 2012. Wiki says he works at CAB.

 

---

[Mucca Mad Boys]

Nelllist lost his seat in 2012. Wiki says he works at CAB.

I'm well aware, but that wasn't my point.

Note: I said 'had', past tense...

 

[Wrenstreetcarpark]

The journalist did not say it was in the current negotiations.

and you would know because you sleep with him, eat with him and write with him.

 

[Grendel]

and you would know because you sleep with him, eat with him and write with him.

A typically mature response from someone who seems far more interested in the council than the club and no doubt was less interested in Southampton Harry shaw the inland revenue etc

 

[Wrenstreetcarpark]

Come on now Neil, fess up.

 

[giveusagoal]

That is the real problem. We are being held to ransom by acl and the council on this.

The wonderful previous regime of McGinity at co sold our revenue stream rights to acl for £6m.

Now if CCFC want revenue streams back we have to pay £24m for it.

What is your source for this information?

Am sure Fisher and Sisu would be shouting about it if it was true - all i heard fisher moan about yesterday was not having seen the accounts for the pies.

 

[giveusagoal]

There's a difference on agreeing the stadium rent... Even fisher said that's fine.

It's the revenue stream which we are being held to ransom about.

Listen to all the interviews again and it becomes more obvious.

Acl refuse an outside expert like Deloittes to get involved? Why is that?

Hmmm deloittes - they used to sign off the accounts for a company called Welcome Finance - it later turned out that there was a £750 million black hole in Welcomes accounts - the CEO and most Welcomes directors had to go - some have been banned and fined.

With accountancey skills like that you can see why SISU would like them involved

 

[giveusagoal]

An independent journalist who often writes articles about the club in the daily mail.

And this perosns name?

Why has he not written an article on this?

 

[giveusagoal]

I'm afraid that's not the whole story Jan.

Acl are refusing to give CCFC access to the other revenue streams full stop.

The club cannot compete wage wise next season on food and beverage which is hardly anything.

Acl have told Sisu they have to pay £24m of they want it. Acl don't want the club to have anymore and put a premium on it for the privilege.

Acl are the council. Those board members are all ex Cov council people.

ACL has 5 board members - 2 are employed by the council, as the council owns half of ACL that makes sense - the other 3 are not from the council - can you provide evidence please that they are "ex Cov Council" ?

 

[cloughie]

ACL has 5 board members - 2 are employed by the council, as the council owns half of ACL that makes sense - the other 3 are not from the council - can you provide evidence please that they are "ex Cov Council" ?

No just more BS

 

[giveusagoal]

Have just spoken to Tim Fisher and he has told me that this number was one that was proposed by Daniel Gidney many months ago and has formed no part of the current negotiations. It was a number that obviously was dismissed out of hand by the club and has never been mentioned again by either party so it is really a red herring.
Clarified?

Thank you Jan.

I wish i had read this post before wasting my time replying to nonsense