TA, Torch, Grendel - on various threads you seem to be the three people who tend to defend SISU most. Can one of you explain what sisu's plan is to get us out of div 3, resolve the rent dispute, sort the finances etc etc? I've posted this question before and never get an answer.
No one defends an impersonal owner of an institution. There is ambivalence to owners and that is how it should be. They are merely present drivers of the vehicle you support. To have affinity defies logic.
What you should be doing is looking at others on here -- we all know them, the eccentric who believes a Jamaican International should play for England, the ludicrous one who cannot name the winning goalscorer in a recent game, the man so deluded he thinks former managers have been paid to say positive things about SISU and the one who keeps referring to "sacked after 3 games" when we all know its over 63 -- and questioning their motives and why they are so consumed with hatred it blights their view and jeopardises the clubs future.
What you should be doing is questioning why the council still believes the community asset should be bled dry and why other supporters at other clubs possess so much more collective energy and have forced their respective councils to alter previously punitive rental arrangements.
Many clubs of greater stature have been in this division and many have fared less successfully than ourselves in this initial campaign so the plan is at least as good as Southampton, Leeds, Forest and Sheffield United. In terms of enjoyment and competitiveness I defy you to name a season more rewarding in the last decade.
The assumption by the deluded is that there is a bright future after Sisu go. There is no evidence of this. I refer you to Lord Grey's view on the Great War. "The lights are going out all over Europe". He was in the minority and was ridiculed as such but of course he was so right. Sometimes the present is far better than the future.
