SISU say they may "get out of town" next week (12 Viewers)

coundonskyblue

New Member
So ACL & The council are now allowed to play God with the football club? What would you define as competent owners? People who are willing to waste a fortune on the club and then go quietly once their money runs out?

ACL can do as they wish with the Ricoh Arena, it is their asset. CCFC is Sisu's responsibilty yet you seem to forget that.

Sisu have already wasted £45m on the club, would you class that as competent?
 

Sick Boy

Super Moderator
What are we supposed to believe ?
one week TF tells us they will build a new stadium the next we will go into liquidation !!!
Tell me anyone how can we believe anything they say ?

Who is they? Tim Fisher?

As supporters we should want what is best for the football club, and that is a fair amount of rent to be paid, as well as all revenue generated by our fans. Any other investor looking to buy the club would want the same. It doesn't make sense for people to support the club being denied these and being anti-sisu. The club would look much more attractive to a buyer if we were to get these. I am sure sisu would love to get out, but until they can make the club more attractive to a buyer then that is not going to happen and it will prolong their stay.
 

ashbyjan

Well-Known Member
Why should the club not benefit from all revenue generated by their own supporters? Anyone looking to buy the club would expect the same as well.

The anti-sisu sentiment is so strong amongst our supporters that they are against what is best for their football club. Bizarre.

The simple answer is because the club sold those rights when they sold their half of ACL for £6.5m - they could always buy back those rights?
 

Sick Boy

Super Moderator
ACL can do as they wish with the Ricoh Arena, it is their asset. CCFC is Sisu's responsibilty yet you seem to forget that.

Sisu have already wasted £45m on the club, would you class that as competent?

What has it been wasted on? How many other owner's of football club have poured money into a club and seen no return on it. Poor decisions, including hiring Ray Ranson to run the club have proved a disaster, as well poor choices of managers including Coleman (who spent a lot of money in comparison to recent managers) & Andy Thorn. I am convinced if we had got in Robins last season we would have stayed up. It is only since Waggot has been here we have finally looked to become more astute in who we chose to manage the club.
 

Mucca Mad Boys

Well-Known Member
A lot of people will see their wishes come true if this IS true, you know what they say, 'be careful what you wish for!'
 

theferret

Well-Known Member
Facts are ACL have offered CCFC around £250k in revenue (£100k f&b profits and £150k car parking) and also offered to cross invoice the f&b turnover (£1m) for FFP purposes for CCFC so they would be receiving significant revenue for their £400k rent - oh and a Premier League standard ground as well.

The mentality of some is completely twisted, it's almost as if they think ACL are doing the football club a favour. You think this is a good deal? Even if you accept the figures you quote, it still represents a net contribution of 150K per year for a 3rd division football club.

The arrogance of ACL is astounding when you consider the extent to which their business benefits from the football club. The Ricoh naming rights deal would have been worthless without the football club, and yet ACL have benefitted from that to the tune of millions, not to mention the compass catering deal, years of excessive rent charges, parking revenues and increased leverage when negotiating deals with the hotel and casino operators.

ACL have been riding the gravy train for years, to the point where the football clubs has been crippled, and yet they have the audacity to then try and play the victim and make legal moves against the club. It is sickening, and the fact there are so many people willing to apologise for their stance is truly shocking.
 

coundonskyblue

New Member
What has it been wasted on? How many other owner's of football club have poured money into a club and seen no return on it. Poor decisions, including hiring Ray Ranson to run the club have proved a disaster, as well poor choices of managers including Coleman (who spent a lot of money in comparison to recent managers) & Andy Thorn.

I would say taking a mid table championship club, investing £45m into it, and the end result that club being a mid table league 1 club is a disaster by anyones standards.

You could have put an ordinary person off the street at the helm over the last few years and they wouldn't have done as much damage as these clowns.
 

Sick Boy

Super Moderator
Only in Coventry would you ever find this attitude, other club's supporters are so passionate about their club there would be uproar to protect the interest's of the club.
 

Sick Boy

Super Moderator
I would say taking a mid table championship club, investing £45m into it, and the end result that club being a mid table league 1 club is a disaster by anyones standards.

You could have put an ordinary person off the street at the helm over the last few years and they wouldn't have done as much damage as these clowns.

How were we a mid table Championship club when they came in? We had already had our flirts with relegation since we had been in the Championship. We finished 8th in one season under Adams, but we were hardly an established mid-table club. We were already on a slow decline.

I agree though, the decision to employ Ranson and Coleman was a disaster.
 
Last edited:

Bluegloucester

New Member
Only in Coventry would you ever find this attitude, other club's supporters are so passionate about their club there would be uproar to protect the interest's of the club.

The best interests of the club rest with new owners who can run the club properly for the benefit of everyone connected with it.
 

sky blue john

Well-Known Member
Who is they? Tim Fisher?

As supporters we should want what is best for the football club, and that is a fair amount of rent to be paid, as well as all revenue generated by our fans. Any other investor looking to buy the club would want the same. It doesn't make sense for people to support the club being denied these and being anti-sisu. The club would look much more attractive to a buyer if we were to get these. I am sure sisu would love to get out, but until they can make the club more attractive to a buyer then that is not going to happen and it will prolong their stay.

I agree but Sisu have made such a pigs ear of negotiations and made howling tactical errors that have left them to be alienated by the only people that can give them or sell them what they need !!!
The only hope is for Sisu to sell on to someone that ACL, Counsel and Higgs can trust to be able to negotiate the revenues the club needs.
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
I would say taking a mid table championship club, investing £45m into it, and the end result that club being a mid table league 1 club is a disaster by anyones standards.

You could have put an ordinary person off the street at the helm over the last few years and they wouldn't have done as much damage as these clowns.

Do you think Nottingham forest and Leicester city are well run?
 

Sick Boy

Super Moderator
The mentality of some is completely twisted, it's almost as if they think ACL are doing the football club a favour. You think this is a good deal? Even if you accept the figures you quote, it still represents a net contribution of 150K per year for a 3rd division football club.

The arrogance of ACL is astounding when you consider the extent to which their business benefits from the football club. The Ricoh naming rights deal would have been worthless without the football club, and yet ACL have benefitted from that to the tune of millions, not to mention the compass catering deal, years of excessive rent charges, parking revenues and increased leverage when negotiating deals with the hotel and casino operators.

ACL have been riding the gravy train for years, to the point where the football clubs has been crippled, and yet they have the audacity to then try and play the victim and make legal moves against the club. It is sickening, and the fact there are so many people willing to apologise for their stance is truly shocking.

Some of them are convinced that ACL are going to buy the club!! hahaha!!
 

coundonskyblue

New Member
Why should the council decide who is competent or not, are they god?

Just like when they banned any more strip clubs being opened in Coventry because they thought it was immoral.

Because the Ricoh is part owned by the Council and is their responsibilty.

What has Coventry Council's licensing Authority committee got to do with this?
 

Mucca Mad Boys

Well-Known Member
The best interests of the club rest with new owners who can run the club properly for the benefit of everyone connected with it.

I guarantee these mystical owners you speak of would push for a similar rent agreement CCFC have pushed for this season.

So many short-sighted people.
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
The best interests of the club rest with new owners who can run the club properly for the benefit of everyone connected with it.

What like all the owners before sisu?
 

Sick Boy

Super Moderator
I agree but Sisu have made such a pigs ear of negotiations and made howling tactical errors that have left them to be alienated by the only people that can give them or sell them what they need !!!
The only hope is for Sisu to sell on to someone that ACL, Counsel and Higgs can trust to be able to negotiate the revenues the club needs.

Like who?

Why are ACL and the Council now playing God with the football club? They hardly have our best interests at heart, do they?

I think we will be waiting for a very long time on this one.
 

elephanttears

New Member
How were we a mid table Championship club when they came in? We had already been flirting with relegation for the previous couple of seasons.

I agree though, the decision to employ Ranson and Coleman was a disaster.

Hold on a minute, how well have the council ran Coventry, the place if falling to ruin. They even turned away the radio 1 big weekend they are idiots. The town centre is a shithole, hardly any jobs business rates through the roof. I see the councillors were swanning off on a joly to Brazil recently to explore "twin cities" what a waste of money that is.
 

coundonskyblue

New Member
How were we a mid table Championship club when they came in? We had already had our flirts with relegation since we had been in the Championship. We finished 8th in one season under Adams, but we were hardly an established mid-table club. We were already on a slow decline.

I agree though, the decision to employ Ranson and Coleman was a disaster.

The club was 11th when they took over, seems mid table to me.
 

Sick Boy

Super Moderator
The best interests of the club rest with new owners who can run the club properly for the benefit of everyone connected with it.

That would include wanting the best deal for the football club, something sisu are currently trying to obtain and many on here are against.
 

Sick Boy

Super Moderator
The club was 11th when they took over, seems mid table to me.

So you believe we were in a healthy position when sisu took over the club and were a strong mid-table team?

I haven't seen many people on here slating Ranson too much, a lot of the anti-sisu mob still revere him for some strange reason.
 
J

Jack Griffin

Guest
And wasn't the figure 20 million to buy them back?

I thought £20M was to buy the Higgs 1/2 share of the stadium, which the club sold to them for £6.5M some years ago (Mind you I'm not sure where that figure comes from as I thought the Higgs/SISU negotiations were not public, this article in the CET states the figure is 'rumoured to be £10M' http://www.coventrytelegraph.net/ne...city-ricoh-arena-stadium-deal-92746-31880394/).

Anyway they are being given back the part of F&B that ACL has access to in the deal explained by Ashbyjan, the rest is tied up in a long term contract with Compass. Are you saying ACL should break that contract?
 
Last edited by a moderator:

coundonskyblue

New Member
I guarantee these mystical owners you speak of would push for a similar rent agreement CCFC have pushed for this season.

So many short-sighted people.

I also guarantee that any sensible new owners would show some humility and accept the club has no one to blame but itself for its current position.

They would ASK for help rather than make demands for money that is not leagally theirs.
 

elephanttears

New Member
Because the Ricoh is part owned by the Council and is their responsibilty.

What has Coventry Council's licensing Authority committee got to do with this?

Whos to say they wont be like this with whatever owners we have. They will probably refuse to work with anyone unless its mother teresa.

Regarding the strip clubs it just shows they are poking their pointy little noses in in people business. Some bit of skirt on the council probably got on her high horse saying women are being exploited blah blah blah.
 

ashbyjan

Well-Known Member
I thought £20M was to buy the Higgs 1/2 share of the stadium, which the club sold to them for £6.5M some years ago (Mind you I'm not sure where that figure comes from as I thought the Higgs/SISU negotiations were not public).

Anyway they are being given back the part of F&B that ACL has access to in the deal explained by Ashbyjan, the rest is tied up in a long term contract with Compass. Are you saying ACL should break that contract?

Cost agreed to buy Higgs shares was below the £6.5m Higgs received for them - but hell never let the facts get in the way of a blind rant
 

coundonskyblue

New Member
So you believe we were in a healthy position when sisu took over the club and were a strong mid-table team?

I haven't seen many people on here slating Ranson too much, a lot of the anti-sisu mob still revere him for some strange reason.

No I don't, the club was in a mess, but the facts are the team were sat in mid table.

They then went on a bit of a bad run, Ranson (part of Sisu) decided to sack Dowie and get Coleman in.
 

CovFan

Well-Known Member
I thought £20M was to buy the Higgs 1/2 share of the stadium, which the club sold to them for £6.5M some years ago.

Anyway they are being given back the part of F&B that ACL has access to in the deal explained by Ashbyjan, the rest is tied up in a long term contract with Compass. Are you saying ACL should break that contract?

http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/teams/c/coventry_city/6763627.stm

That link seems to suggest you are right about the 50% thing. But I never knew who actually owned the other "50%.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top