Grendel
Well-Known Member
The rent alone accounted for 1/6 of turnover, which in the year to May 2012 was £7,782,519.
That doesn't include other direct income (match fees, car parking etc.), and also the indirect income it gets from having CCFC there.
Put it this way, my company uses the Ricoh to hold training and business meetings. It won't be in future (whether the club stay or not). I use the casino before and after every home game, so that would stop. You wonder if the club going would have much impact of the casino operator and if they would attempt to renegotiate their tenancy when it came up for renewal? I'm willing to bet that the 25 days where CCFC play at home are amongst their most lucrative. Another unknown really.
The true value to ACL of the stadium being home to CCFC is very hard to put a figure on.
It's impossible to put a figure on but the notion it will have no impact other than rent revenue is pie in the sky.
I too have a similar view on the main sponsor. Seem to really annoy someone at the time I recall. It is not just then either. The main exhibition hall is sponsored by another company who were definitely initially attracted by the football club. Comparisons to LG and. O2 are invalid. These are long established performance venues.
People mention alternative sporting teams to take our place but again all very easy in theory but very difficult in practice. Also to attract new clients ACL would have to recruit a new management team for that express purpose. The fact they are largely a council subsidised company will hamper dynamism as private companies normally are more reactionary.
Agree with the conference favity comments as well. We no longer use the venue. It is poor and in decline.