City Not Appealed 10 Point Deduction (7 Viewers)

Forums New posts
ashbyjan

ashbyjan

Well-Known Member
From Les Reid Twitter feed

BREAKING: Sources say #CCFC still haven't appealed to Football League against 10-point deduction. Talks ongoing.
 
C

CovFan

Well-Known Member
If they appeal it would the 10 points then be carried over to next season or would it still count for this season?
 
oldskyblue58

oldskyblue58

CCFC Finance Director
Is the 7 days up yet ?

Talks on going ?
 
mark82

mark82

Super Moderator
What's the point anyway. We will not make the playoffs regardless now. Damage already done.
 
CovLis86

CovLis86

Well-Known Member
If there was no penalty whatsoever in appealing, then it's pointless even asking. Surely everyone would appeal just in case as the worst that could happen would it would stand anyway... There has to be something against appealing.
 
Sub

Sub

Well-Known Member
steve-waggott-915929133.jpg
Steve Waggott​

COVENTRY City are still pondering whether to contest the ten-point deduction they incurred when they put part of the club into administration last week.
Tomorrow is the deadline for making an appeal and development director Steve Waggott confirmed today: "We’re in the process of taking legal advice about the next steps.
"We’ve got to manage expectations. We would only go ahead if we thought we had a realistic chance of winning and I think it’s fair to say that the chances of overturning the decision are thin because it’s never been done before.
"But this is not your normal sort of administration and there are several aspects to our case which we feel could be worth pursuing."​

No shit its not normal !! there can not be that many clubs that have so many different companies that own them !!!:facepalm::facepalm:
 
mattylad

mattylad

Member
Such a shame because I like Steve Waggott and regardless of what has gone on I hoped that he would be in a neutral position and would remain at the club if new owners arrived. Unfortunately by giving this interview in which he talks about appeals and alike he nails his colours firmly to the SISU mast and so must also go with the rest of them. He sould have left such statements to TF to make.
 
B

Bluegloucester

New Member
mattylad said:
Such a shame because I like Steve Waggott and regardless of what has gone on I hoped that he would be in a neutral position and would remain at the club if new owners arrived. Unfortunately by giving this interview in which he talks about appeals and alike he nails his colours firmly to the SISU mast and so must also go with the rest of them. He sould have left such statements to TF to make.
Click to expand...

I feel sorry for Steve Waggott, I think he has done a good job and I hope he stays if we have a regime change. I would rather hear statements from him than Fisher, but think the club have put him in an invidious position.
 
S

SkyblueBazza

Well-Known Member
mattylad said:
Such a shame because I like Steve Waggott and regardless of what has gone on I hoped that he would be in a neutral position and would remain at the club if new owners arrived. Unfortunately by giving this interview in which he talks about appeals and alike he nails his colours firmly to the SISU mast and so must also go with the rest of them. He sould have left such statements to TF to make.
Click to expand...

Be fair - in any business there are roles were absolute loyalty are required. As part of his role he is directed to speak with the media about such matters...& through the loyalty demanded (sacked due to untenable due to lack of loyalty & reputation ruined making him unemployable vs golden handshake & loyalty in the face of extreme circumstance) he spouts his boss' line.
 
Nonleagueherewecome

Nonleagueherewecome

Well-Known Member
So when they said they would appeal...bet Presser's well chuffed with this turn of events.
 
S

SkyblueBazza

Well-Known Member
Bluegloucester said:
I feel sorry for Steve Waggott, I think he has done a good job and I hope he stays if we have a regime change. I would rather hear statements from him than Fisher, but think the club have put him in an invidious position.
Click to expand...

In light of the aforementioned loyalty to the current regime - any new regime would remove him IMO. Tarnished with what has already happened & is currently happening. Any new owner will want to freshen up the structure. No matter how good he is at his job.
 
N

NottsCov

New Member
If it was decided that it was a frivolous appeal then surely there would be further punishment ie. another 10/15 points off next season? Just leave it be I say.
 
Nonleagueherewecome

Nonleagueherewecome

Well-Known Member
Nonleagueherewecome

Nonleagueherewecome

Well-Known Member
Having read the CT piece again, it's a bit harsh to be hammering Waggott; if that was a Fisher interview there would have been a good 4 or 5 nasty digs at ACL along the way. He really is just the messenger in this-although why he's the mouthpiece this time, rather than Fisher, is slightly confusing. I suppose if the majority of the article transpires to be about the budget for next season etc, it might make more sense, although frankly it's a bit premature for anybody in the SISU camp to be talking about that. Hopefully they won't be here!
 
sky_blue_up_north

sky_blue_up_north

Well-Known Member
I think Waggot is one of the few for SISU's cronies who can say has done a half decent job. I cannot see the point of appealing to be honest, as its bound to fail.
 
B

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
CovLis86 said:
If there was no penalty whatsoever in appealing, then it's pointless even asking. Surely everyone would appeal just in case as the worst that could happen would it would stand anyway... There has to be something against appealing.
Click to expand...

Football League rule 82:

'82.1 A party may only appeal against an order of the FDC on the grounds that either:

82.1.1 based on findings of fact made, the order of the FDC is obviously wrong; and/or

82.1.2 there has been a serious irregularity in the conduct of the proceedings before the
FDC; and/or

82.1.3 the order of the FDC is too severe or too lenient having regard to all the circumstances of the case'

http://www.football-league.co.uk/re...missions-disputes-and-appeals_2293633_2125735
 
Nonleagueherewecome

Nonleagueherewecome

Well-Known Member
S

SonofErnie

Well-Known Member
I don't see the point, even winning the last four games won't get us in the play offs and the prize money for a higher placing in this division must be negligible. If there is an appeal lodged it can only be on the basis that SISU want to save face and prove that the whole club is not in admin.
 
B

Bluegloucester

New Member
SonofErnie said:
I don't see the point, even winning the last four games won't get us in the play offs and the prize money for a higher placing in this division must be negligible. If there is an appeal lodged it can only be on the basis that SISU want to save face and prove that the whole club is not in admin.
Click to expand...

That's already proven. All football related agreements rest with CCFC Ltd. CCFC H was trying to argue that they had an interest in the golden share, not legal ownership.
 
S

SonofErnie

Well-Known Member
Bluegloucester said:
That's already proven. All football related agreements rest with CCFC Ltd. CCFC H was trying to argue that they had an interest in the golden share, not legal ownership.
Click to expand...

I'm not sure that's 100% proven at this stage, otherwise why is the administrator going to take the best part of 2 months pulling together a report on the club's structure, ownership and debt position?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 8 (members: 0, guests: 8)
Top