club statement (7 Viewers)

Sub

Well-Known Member
Club statement regarding Academy residence at the Alan Higgs Centre
Coventry City Football Club (Holdings) Ltd have released a statement following recent talks regarding the football club's Academy residence at the Alan Higgs Centre.

Steve Waggott, CCFC Development Director, said: “Coventry City Football Club Holdings Limited (CCFC Holdings) are extremely disappointed by the Alan Higgs Centre Trust’s decision to not allow the Academy access to the Higgs Centre.

“This decision appears to have been taken despite letters, emails and phone calls between each party, legal representatives and the administrator over the last week to try to reach a new commercial agreement that would allow the Academy to continue to operate out of The Alan Higgs Centre as the season draws to a close.

“All that the Club and Academy want and need is a very simple, uncomplicated commercial agreement with the Alan Higgs Centre Trust for the next three months that is, and should be, completely divorced from any other on-going issues away from our youth development programme.

“If this can be achieved then it would enable the Academy to continue to flourish by delivering its excellent work of recruiting and training the future stars of Coventry City Football Club – and provide the centre with rental income.

“Everyone knows how important an Academy is to a club and to the town or city it represents. We have a great record in producing young, home-grown players, as our squad showed last Saturday.

“CCFC Holdings had offered to pay the full commercial market rate to hire the centre out for the Academy to use until the end of June whilst also agreeing to pay for the extra sessions the Academy and First Team required during the recent spells of bad weather when our grass pitches were unplayable.

“The Club were also happy to look at the quotes the Alan Higgs Centre Trust has received in relation to covering the cost of the repairs to the grounds maintenance equipment to ensure this essential equipment is fully operable.

“The reluctance of the Alan Higgs Centre Trustees to agree to a deal, despite on-going attempts by CCFC Holdings to resolve the situation, has unfortunately meant that the young academy players have had a reduced training programme over the Easter holidays and are now having to train and play their matches at alternative venues.

“We have, quite understandably, had to implement our contingency plans and make alternative arrangements through to the end of the season. We had hoped we would not have to activate these plans, but we need to give the players, parents and staff certainty our programme is continuing.

“Academy Manager Gregor Rioch has had meetings with players and their parents who fully understand the position we are in and are very supportive.”

Rioch said: “Whilst we realise this is unsettling for all concerned and most importantly for the parents and all our young players, we are determined to continue to operate and deliver a full youth programme over the remaining weeks of the season.

“We would have still preferred to have kept the Academy at the Alan Higgs Centre as we entered this crucial end of season period during which we look to recruit new young local talent whilst trying to retain those already on our books but who are of interest to other professional clubs.

“Surely that, regardless of personalities or politics, is in everyone’s interests.”
 

CJparker

New Member
"we are extremely disappointed that we are not able to use someone else's facilities whilst paying nothing for them" - pathetic
 
if they paid the rent in the first place again then we would not be in another stupid aviodable situation. if this is all down to being in administration then how anybody can blame the higgs charity is beyond me.

just fecking go sisu
 

Nonleagueherewecome

Well-Known Member
So essentially they're trying to blackmail them by not paying rent now?
 

James Smith

Well-Known Member
A statement that fails to mention or account for the final destination of the £500k grant that the Academy got, what a surprise.
 
Last edited:

hill83

Well-Known Member
Is everyone missing this bit?

“CCFC Holdings had offered to pay the full commercial market rate to hire the centre out for the Academy to use until the end of June whilst also agreeing to pay for the extra sessions the Academy and First Team required during the recent spells of bad weather when our grass pitches were unplayable.


How do we take that?

But then,

“The Club were also happy to look at the quotes the Alan Higgs Centre Trust has received in relation to covering the cost of the repairs to the grounds maintenance equipment to ensure this essential equipment is fully operable.

How do we take that?
 

Godiva

Well-Known Member
"we are extremely disappointed that we are not able to use someone else's facilities whilst paying nothing for them" - pathetic

So essentially they're trying to blackmail them by not paying rent now?

Really - are you reading the statement or just second guessing what is in it?

Club statement regarding Academy residence at the Alan Higgs Centre
Coventry City Football Club (Holdings) Ltd have released a statement following recent talks regarding the football club's Academy residence at the Alan Higgs Centre.

“All that the Club and Academy want and need is a very simple, uncomplicated commercial agreement with the Alan Higgs Centre Trust for the next three months that is, and should be, completely divorced from any other on-going issues away from our youth development programme.

“CCFC Holdings had offered to pay the full commercial market rate to hire the centre out for the Academy to use until the end of June whilst also agreeing to pay for the extra sessions the Academy and First Team required during the recent spells of bad weather when our grass pitches were unplayable.

“The Club were also happy to look at the quotes the Alan Higgs Centre Trust has received in relation to covering the cost of the repairs to the grounds maintenance equipment to ensure this essential equipment is fully operable.

“The reluctance of the Alan Higgs Centre Trustees to agree to a deal, despite on-going attempts by CCFC Holdings to resolve the situation, has unfortunately meant that the young academy players have had a reduced training programme over the Easter holidays and are now having to train and play their matches at alternative venues.


Take this statement along with the Higgs statement and it looks like
- the club simply want a three month deal to make sure the academy is operating until the end of the season - even if the club will have to pay more than previously.
- Higgs are refusing this to apply more public pressure on sisu and force a regime change.

It's a dirty game they all play.
 

oldskyblue58

CCFC Finance Director
All that the Club and Academy want and need is a very simple, uncomplicated commercial agreement with the Alan Higgs Centre Trust for the next three months that is, and should be, completely divorced from any other on-going issues away from our youth development programme

Need for only 3 months ? what is the plan after that ?

dont see how it is completely divorced seeing the original club contract was with CCFC Ltd which was owned by CCFC Holding, all of which is effectively the trading football club

wonder when the Board of Trustees next meeting is ?

Surely as CCFC Holdings knew that they were putting CCFC Ltd in to admin some time ago then they would have made contingency plans for Easter holidays ? Not just assumed they could go on regardless.

Sounds to me that with the new contigency plan and only 3 months hire of facilities required that they were making other plans for the Academy anyway ....... wonder if that includes category B status because that requires an annual spend of £500k to get the grant? not to mention a level of criteria that probably isnt available elsewhere in the city

Have the trustees made a decision or not ? or is it about the timing ? Clearly CCFC dont seem to want to be there after June - why? If thats the case the Centre needs to market itself now to replace income.

Find it very strange that the only statements out of the club now come from employees like Waggott

None of it reads well whichever way you look at it
 
Last edited:

Nonleagueherewecome

Well-Known Member
How about the club just way what they are legally obliged to? This sounds like more trying to weasel out of another commitment via the "ah, they're two companies, totally unrelated" bullshit twist.

Why are you so quick to defend them and accuse others, Godiva? Just how much do those cunts pay you?
 

PWKH

New Member
I welcome the Club's statement and look forward to them making contact with us so that we can take this forward.
 

hill83

Well-Known Member
How about the club just way what they are legally obliged to? This sounds like more trying to weasel out of another commitment via the "ah, they're two companies, totally unrelated" bullshit twist.

Why are you so quick to defend them and accuse others, Godiva? Just how much do those cunts pay you?

I don't think he's defending them to be fair, more just pointing out that some people clearly haven't read the statement and made up their own conclusion from it.
 

RoboCCFC90

Well-Known Member
I welcome the Club's statement and look forward to them making contact with us so that we can take this forward.

So is there anything in that statement that's untrue?
 

georgehudson

Well-Known Member
i hope the administrator & Mrs Justice Proudman are taking note of these apparent evasive manoevres,
& hope that the fans & players will not be punished,
are these continued actions by the owners legal & above board ?
 

Nonleagueherewecome

Well-Known Member
I don't think he's defending them to be fair, more just pointing out that some people clearly haven't read the statement and made up their own conclusion from it.

I read the statement and drew my own conclusion based on SISU's standard behaviour; he immediately jumps on me to say I haven't read it. He's a SISU apologist like no other and to my recollection has never, not once, posted on a football matter. He is blatantly a SISU placeman and really does need to fuck off!
 

hill83

Well-Known Member
I read the statement and drew my own conclusion based on SISU's standard behaviour; he immediately jumps on me to say I haven't read it. He's a SISU apologist like no other and to my recollection has never, not once, posted on a football matter. He is blatantly a SISU placeman and really does need to fuck off!

Fair enough. But what you said was incorrect based on the statement. Regardless of anyones stance.

And for the record I'm not pro sisu or any of that bollocks, I just notice when people are wrong and like to mention it.
 

coundonskyblue

New Member
Basically they don't want to pay back rent then? Yet still try and take the moral high ground. They way Sisu operate is disgusting and I hate them for tarnishing the name of our Football club.
 

Nonleagueherewecome

Well-Known Member
Fair enough. But what you said was incorrect based on the statement. Regardless of anyones stance.

And for the record I'm not pro sisu or any of that bollocks, I just notice when people are wrong and like to mention it.

I didn't state any facts, I stated my opinion. Tell me where I'm factually wrong in that opinion, will you?
 

oldskyblue58

CCFC Finance Director
Just to be clear when Steve Waggott is described as development director that is not a company director in law under the Companies Acts - he is not on the Board of Directors. He is an employee or perhaps even used as a self employed consultant.

unless of course he has been recently appointed and paperwork has been filed ...... where might I have heard that before ? :facepalm::whistle:
 

Godiva

Well-Known Member
I read the statement and drew my own conclusion based on SISU's standard behaviour; he immediately jumps on me to say I haven't read it. He's a SISU apologist like no other and to my recollection has never, not once, posted on a football matter. He is blatantly a SISU placeman and really does need to fuck off!

I have put myself on probation posting on football matters as I found I was pretty much always criticizing McSheffrey. When he retires I will post again.
Oh, and I didn't 'say' you hadn't read it - just asked if you had.
 

Nonleagueherewecome

Well-Known Member
I have put myself on probation posting on football matters as I found I was pretty much always criticizing McSheffrey. When he retires I will post again.
Oh, and I didn't 'say' you hadn't read it - just asked if you had.


You didn't say how much they are paying you!
 

Nonleagueherewecome

Well-Known Member

Godiva

Well-Known Member
Why not just pay what they owe? Why do they need a new agreement?

I think the original agreement was with the company now in administration and therefore no longer valid.
 

Nonleagueherewecome

Well-Known Member
No idea to be honest. I wish they would just pay the f*cker though. It's ridiculous.

That's just it, if it's because they are trying to get out of existing debt then it's business as usual from them. They won't pay what they owe but want a "new arrangement"; sounds familiar.
 

Delboycov

Active Member
I read the statement and drew my own conclusion based on SISU's standard behaviour; he immediately jumps on me to say I haven't read it. He's a SISU apologist like no other and to my recollection has never, not once, posted on a football matter. He is blatantly a SISU placeman and really does need to feck off!

I couldn't agree with you more NLHWC and I've said the same many times. Godiva is more pro SISU than SISU and I have never once seen him question anything that the owners have done even though they've aplologised themselves for their many mistakes...We were safe in SISU's hands...we would be at break even soon...we had no danger of getting relegated...even saying the text a sub nonsense was a fantastic idea. I would love one day for him to come on here and admit he got it wrong...admit his faith in them was misplaced. I can't see that happening as I really do believe he is a SISU 'plant'.
 

georgehudson

Well-Known Member
these continued actions by sisu are now rounded off by trying to harm the very thing that they bleated on about for so long, notably, the development of players through our academy,
are we therefore left to assume that this latest action is one of sheer spite
 

Samo

Well-Known Member
Club statement regarding Academy residence at the Alan Higgs Centre
Coventry City Football Club (Holdings) Ltd have released a statement following recent talks regarding the football club's Academy residence at the Alan Higgs Centre.

Steve Waggott, CCFC Development Director, said: “Coventry City Football Club Holdings Limited (CCFC Holdings) are extremely disappointed by the Alan Higgs Centre Trust’s decision to not allow the Academy access to the Higgs Centre.

“This decision appears to have been taken despite letters, emails and phone calls between each party, legal representatives and the administrator over the last week to try to reach a new commercial agreement that would allow the Academy to continue to operate out of The Alan Higgs Centre as the season draws to a close.

“All that the Club and Academy want and need is a very simple, uncomplicated commercial agreement with the Alan Higgs Centre Trust for the next three months that is, and should be, completely divorced from any other on-going issues away from our youth development programme.

“If this can be achieved then it would enable the Academy to continue to flourish by delivering its excellent work of recruiting and training the future stars of Coventry City Football Club – and provide the centre with rental income.

“Everyone knows how important an Academy is to a club and to the town or city it represents. We have a great record in producing young, home-grown players, as our squad showed last Saturday.

“CCFC Holdings had offered to pay the full commercial market rate to hire the centre out for the Academy to use until the end of June whilst also agreeing to pay for the extra sessions the Academy and First Team required during the recent spells of bad weather when our grass pitches were unplayable.

“The Club were also happy to look at the quotes the Alan Higgs Centre Trust has received in relation to covering the cost of the repairs to the grounds maintenance equipment to ensure this essential equipment is fully operable.

“The reluctance of the Alan Higgs Centre Trustees to agree to a deal, despite on-going attempts by CCFC Holdings to resolve the situation, has unfortunately meant that the young academy players have had a reduced training programme over the Easter holidays and are now having to train and play their matches at alternative venues.

“We have, quite understandably, had to implement our contingency plans and make alternative arrangements through to the end of the season. We had hoped we would not have to activate these plans, but we need to give the players, parents and staff certainty our programme is continuing.

“Academy Manager Gregor Rioch has had meetings with players and their parents who fully understand the position we are in and are very supportive.”

Rioch said: “Whilst we realise this is unsettling for all concerned and most importantly for the parents and all our young players, we are determined to continue to operate and deliver a full youth programme over the remaining weeks of the season.

“We would have still preferred to have kept the Academy at the Alan Higgs Centre as we entered this crucial end of season period during which we look to recruit new young local talent whilst trying to retain those already on our books but who are of interest to other professional clubs.

“Surely that, regardless of personalities or politics, is in everyone’s interests.”

What a pathetic pile of nauseating dribble, laced with a very crude and transparent attempt at emotional blackmail!

'as we entered this crucial end of season period during which we look to recruit new young local talent whilst trying to retain those already on our books but who are of interest to other professional clubs' Look everybody, we might lose all our best youngsters because of those nasty charity people! (who we refuse to pay!)

Disgraceful!
 

covmark

Well-Known Member
I couldn't agree with you more NLHWC and I've said the same many times. Godiva is more pro SISU than SISU and I have never once seen him question anything that the owners have done even though they've aplologised themselves for their many mistakes...We were safe in SISU's hands...we would be at break even soon...we had no danger of getting relegated...even saying the text a sub nonsense was a fantastic idea. I would love one day for him to come on here and admit he got it wrong...admit his faith in them was misplaced. I can't see that happening as I really do believe he is a SISU 'plant'.

A SISU 'plant'. Jesus Fucking Christ, what planet are you on. Wow someone disagrees with your opinion, get over it, sick to the back teeth of all this pro sisu bollocks, I'm sure the bloke is pro ccfc, but because he has a different view to many on here he's a sisu lover. Bullshit of the highest order!
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top