Did not listen (home from work too late.....again) what did he say?At least they found the only sisu fan in town .......The last caller
It's the Council's fault that Sisu did not pay the rent which they agreed to?its the councils fault basically
At least they found the only sisu fan in town .......The last caller
I thought the last caller made a bit of sense in a way. Because, it's not all SISUs fault. The Council have to take some blame for our position too. Not the none payment of rent obviously, but the unsustainable amount it was pegged at. ACL are dragging us down just as much as SISU are.
Nobody can deny that there has been fault on both sides yet I think more so from sisu, but the point was that the guy said he didn't think it was sisu' s fault it's all the councils doing
I thought the last caller made a bit of sense in a way. Because, it's not all SISUs fault. The Council have to take some blame for our position too. Not the none payment of rent obviously, but the unsustainable amount it was pegged at. ACL are dragging us down just as much as SISU are.
I thought the last caller made a bit of sense in a way. Because, it's not all SISUs fault. The Council have to take some blame for our position too. Not the none payment of rent obviously, but the unsustainable amount it was pegged at. ACL are dragging us down just as much as SISU are.
Waggott told us nothing skirted the important question, about time we hired Jeremy Paxman to do the sport on a Friday night
As ive asked before why is the Council to blame, rent 1.25x5=6 miillion
Debt 60-6=54million but bear in mind they havent paid any rent for over a year
So were the council responsible for the huge debt that Sisu have?
Oh and these wonderfull business people think that threatening to play outside of the city of Coventry is a great idea. Yes and building a new stadium is another.
OPEN YOUR EYES
I thought the last caller made a bit of sense in a way. Because, it's not all SISUs fault. The Council have to take some blame for our position too. Not the none payment of rent obviously, but the unsustainable amount it was pegged at. ACL are dragging us down just as much as SISU are.
If only they'd made numerous offers over the last 16 months to try and help the client in not having to pay what the contract they agreed to was.
If only....
If only they showed a commitment to the football club in the first place by not trying to fleece them when at their lowest ebb.
Sisu are a hedge fund. They are what they are. You would not expect the same attitude from your local council.
Well we will see soon enough the councils stance now. The current offer will never be acceptable to any new owner. They will have to make a lot more concessions.
I don't recall the events of that December in the same way as you, clearly.
I take it all back if SISU were forced at gun-point into taking on Cov City and the contracts.
Neither do I recall the preceding events of coming close to relegation on numerous occasions and publicly questioning the level of rent charged.
I also don't recall any legal precedent deeming that because a company is a hedge fund, they are able to neglect the conditions of any contract they have been happy to fulfill for 5 years or more.
But I see your point, it's ACL's fault for being screwed out of in excess of 16 months rent :wave:
You probably don't recall the Club wanting to talk to the Council about the rent level only three months after we moved into the place in December 2005 then either?
I don't recall that either. Please therefore enlighten us.You probably don't recall the Club wanting to talk to the Council about the rent level only three months after we moved into the place in December 2005 then either?
Open your eyes. £60m is a complete misnomer.
It'd be interesting to look at the council's budget management over the years.
Is it? Then please share your insight and knowledge of where we are in financial terms.
My eyes are open unlike some but then again perhaps theirs are open as well but maybe a tad myopic