confirmned by the club (1 Viewer)
- Thread starter luwalla
- Start date
italiahorse
Well-Known Member
Not me and 85% of fans. Enjoy the space.
James Smith
Well-Known Member
Not going to support a new owner making unreasonable rent demands if it means that ACL ends up in administration because they're getting less in than the payments going out, you can't run a business like that it will go bust. However I would hope that an agreement could be reached where the rent was reduced as income from other ACL sources made it possible - as happened when the council bought the mortgage.
Last edited:
torchomatic
Well-Known Member
It would be better for everyone is ACL didn't exist. The club owning ALL the stadium and not being the slaves of the Council is the best solution for Coventry City and its fans.
Yes,but not under your mates at sisu. This is what you can't seem to grasp.
D
Deleted member 5849
Guest
No, the stadium needs to be owned by a third party. A council with a public responsibility is ideal.
That's different to the club needing the ability to take advantage of the stadium more than it does at the moment, and that's where ACL existing can work as the vehicle it was originally intended to, to give the club that ability. Maybe not existing in its present form, but its existence is not a negative in itself.
I find this very disbelieving,you've had your head up sisu's arse for years,even after relegation you were still jacking off over them.
SkyblueBazza
Well-Known Member
Interesting figure - 85%? Is that fact, opinion or guess based upon something or other?
D
Deleted member 5849
Guest
In his defence it'd be naive to think there wouldn't be a big decline.
Whether that decline is enough to close the club is the main question.