Latest Trust Email (8 Viewers)

psgm1

Banned
As for all facts, no one knows all the facts, but I never profess to know all, just the ones I can prove!

Are you saying this wasn't in your minutes? Are you saying 2000 or so members is more than 10% of the fanbase of coventry (who can fill out the 32k stadium when inspired by a decent prospect of a match)? 10% of 32.

Or are you suggesting that it is not the stated aim of the SBT to get a place on the board? (If so I shall refer you to your website).

I am at a loss at to which fact I have got wrong?

I said that less than 100 people have turned up to all 3 protests. 9 to the first, 12 to the second and a couple of dozen to the last - Have I made a miscalculation? 9+12+24 does not add up to 100 in my calculations - what do you make that calculation out to be?

Or are you just using abuse because you are unable to answer my questions with a viable answer that will prove me wrong? Did you not say you would get back to me with the answers to the questions about the fighting fund over a week ago? Or have yo forgotten, and I need to reprint your response?

Heaven forbid you would tell a lie and say you would answer the questions, but never actually do so - that would be a gross betrayal of your membership - especially for a board member of the open honest and transparent SBT.

Just incase you "FORGOT" the questions, I shall remind you of a few:

1) What is the fighting fund for now?
2) Is the fighting fund still intended to pay for legal fees required to buy part of the club?
3) If you have no intention of buying anymore, will you return this fighting fund?
4) If not buying part of the club, and SBT is a "Not For Profit" group, how can you justify charging anymore?
5) Why have you got a board that is nearly double that needed by the Football League?

Sure you don't have to answer, but you also don't have to be part of the SBT. You said you would meet up in private, but why aren't you prepared to answer these questions in public - after all if you aren't prepared to answer these in public then you genuinely cannot refer to yourselves as open honest and transparent - sorry it just doesn't work like that!

You seem quite vociferous asking these type of questions of ACL & SiSU, yet not prepared to answer them yourself? You DID say you answer them - why haven't you? Wouldn't have been yet another attempt to silence me would it? That would be a clear breach of your own constitution, and as a member of the board, how can you expect others to follow your rules if the very writers of those rules refuse to abide by them!

I am not going to hold my breath awaiting your answer. Btw Is this comment what John Fletcher refers to as going out of your way to be respectful?


"Certainly Steve has been particularly polite and restrained"

This is what John Fletcher considers being "particularly polite and restrained"

"Your a very sad individual, you do not know al the facts."

"You are a real prat"

If John IS being truthful, then boy you must be so full of vile and bitching it must be so frustrating to be in the company of others! Perhaps it's time you resign from the trust, then your sad outbursts will not reflect disgracefully on the SBT! If you cannot treat people with courtesy you should not be a member of any board! Especially one that claims to speak for me!

So can we expect your resignation later ?

Just a thought!
 

Broken Hearted Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
No he won't reply to you Steve he wants answers? accuses and calls everyone who is in the trust Morons he doesn't know them personally.

He has sent personnel messages to other posters on here (threats) I have seen them he gets his mate to threaten posters like simple Simon then blames every one else.

I do not believe for one minute that the trust can get every thing right, but I have to defend them for trying and would defend anyone, Lets all knock everyone else lets have a vote on what everyone wants, lets put it live on the internet. If people were really that bothered they would attend.
I work shifts I have booked off time to attend different functions because it is close to my heart, I have made suggestions some ok some shit I am very passionate and fight for what I believe, is that not my right.

We will get the same old questions does being a Trust member make you better does attending closed offices make any sense does sending e-mails really work does talking to Sisu, ACL or anyone else really work fuck knows but like I said before I am not going to sit back and let them ruin my club anymore without trying.

I don,t really care who organises anything I will attend if I can,whether it is the Trust, PGSM, or even sky blue sam so stop knocking and organise. I will be right behind you
FFS have a rest forget it Coventry City is dieing and on its death the cause of death will be The Sky Blue Trust
 

Paxman II

Well-Known Member
No I like his amusing post.
For about 90% of the time his facts are skewered and simply an adaptation of his own understanding, which seems limited.
 

psgm1

Banned
Let me get this right - yoy NEVER wanted to meet up?

You haven't come on this Very FORUM and had a go at me saying you offered to meet up, yey you said you NEVER asked to meet in private? Unless it was at a forum THAT is what meeting is private is!

Even your chairman admitted you wanted to meet me in private!!!


"Certainly Steve has been particularly polite and restrained, offering on several occasions to talk privately with you about your concerns"

Yet NOW you are saying you NEVER asked to meet in private!

You DO realise other people read this forum don't you?

You Do realise there are many comments posted by you where you have used my refusal to meet in private as an attack against me - Now you are saying you never asked to meet me!

Think you finally have proven you now represent Everything that is wrong with the Sky Blues Trust. The aggressive, underhanded tactics, the blatant Provable lies, the ranting diatribes.

Yet according to your own mission statement :

The Sky Blue Trust is an independent, democratic, not for profit, supporters’ group which operates transparently and with membership open to all Sky Blues supporters.


Yet your personal actions and those of certain individuals within the senior hierarchy of the SBT have totally ignored this ethos!


Your own deeds betray your real motives.


As an aside, to LAST, why would you support someone or something you are diametrically opposed to? As for the tust people, I have now had numerous dealings with members of the trust board, so I can now base my opinion on personal dealings, so I fail to see your argument!


And also doesn't any organisation that receives payment have to be able to justify those payments? Certainly if I ran a group myself, any criticism of me for not doing I had promised to do would be utterly justified! As such the SBT deserves criticism for breaking promises.


You say you defend anyone - yet I haven't seen you defend me!



Also haven't you said for a while now you aren't a member of the trust LAST? Didn't you say you are not a member, yet will support every campaign! Now you are attending the AGM - which is SOLELY for members of the trust!

But how can that be LAST - you said you attacked me for saying you were a member LAST! Now you are taking time off work to attend the AGM - an occassion SOLELY for members of the trust!

Oh dear did you forget that you have been pretending NOT to be a member of the trust for the past month or so?

Seems when I said you were a member, and you called me a fucking idiot, I was right!

Seems LAST has been lying about a few things!
 

Broken Hearted Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
Let me get this right - yoy NEVER wanted to meet up?

You haven't come on this Very FORUM and had a go at me saying you offered to meet up, yey you said you NEVER asked to meet in private? Unless it was at a forum THAT is what meeting is private is!

Even your chairman admitted you wanted to meet me in private!!!


"Certainly Steve has been particularly polite and restrained, offering on several occasions to talk privately with you about your concerns"

Yet NOW you are saying you NEVER asked to meet in private!

You DO realise other people read this forum don't you?

You Do realise there are many comments posted by you where you have used my refusal to meet in private as an attack against me - Now you are saying you never asked to meet me!

Think you finally have proven you now represent Everything that is wrong with the Sky Blues Trust. The aggressive, underhanded tactics, the blatant Provable lies, the ranting diatribes.

Yet according to your own mission statement :

The Sky Blue Trust is an independent, democratic, not for profit, supporters’ group which operates transparently and with membership open to all Sky Blues supporters.


Yet your personal actions and those of certain individuals within the senior hierarchy of the SBT have totally ignored this ethos!


Your own deeds betray your real motives.


As an aside, to LAST, why would you support someone or something you are diametrically opposed to? As for the tust people, I have now had numerous dealings with members of the trust board, so I can now base my opinion on personal dealings, so I fail to see your argument!


And also doesn't any organisation that receives payment have to be able to justify those payments? Certainly if I ran a group myself, any criticism of me for not doing I had promised to do would be utterly justified! As such the SBT deserves criticism for breaking promises.


You say you defend anyone - yet I haven't seen you defend me!



Also haven't you said for a while now you aren't a member of the trust LAST? Didn't you say you are not a member, yet will support every campaign! Now you are attending the AGM - which is SOLELY for members of the trust!

But how can that be LAST - you said you attacked me for saying you were a member LAST! Now you are taking time off work to attend the AGM - an occassion SOLELY for members of the trust!

Oh dear did you forget that you have been pretending NOT to be a member of the trust for the past month or so?

Seems when I said you were a member, and you called me a fucking idiot, I was right!

Seems LAST has been lying about a few things!
Just helping you out here read his post he did not say he was attending the AGM
 

letsallsingtogether

Well-Known Member
Read my post I said I would attend any function that is organised against Sisu you did not have to be a member of the trust to attend the march on Saturday I have left the trust as YOU were threatening to get authorities involved you call posters on here names then start crying and again threaten them with the authorities I for one don't care what you think of me I won't go running to daddy to complain as for the AGM no I will not be attending but if you join you could then you can vote Steve and the rest of them off the committee and take their places and yes I might even re-join and listen to what you want to do.........

As for defending you How can I you Rant and Rave you've not seen one thing the trust has done right,they may have done some things wrong that I may agree with you on' but you have a blanket/blind hatred and that is not Dependable unless it is against SISU

Oh and answer my Question have you or have you not sent out personal mails to other members on this site demanding to know where they live and who they are
Let me get this right - yoy NEVER wanted to meet up?

You haven't come on this Very FORUM and had a go at me saying you offered to meet up, yey you said you NEVER asked to meet in private? Unless it was at a forum THAT is what meeting is private is!

Even your chairman admitted you wanted to meet me in private!!!


"Certainly Steve has been particularly polite and restrained, offering on several occasions to talk privately with you about your concerns"

Yet NOW you are saying you NEVER asked to meet in private!

You DO realise other people read this forum don't you?

You Do realise there are many comments posted by you where you have used my refusal to meet in private as an attack against me - Now you are saying you never asked to meet me!

Think you finally have proven you now represent Everything that is wrong with the Sky Blues Trust. The aggressive, underhanded tactics, the blatant Provable lies, the ranting diatribes.

Yet according to your own mission statement :

The Sky Blue Trust is an independent, democratic, not for profit, supporters’ group which operates transparently and with membership open to all Sky Blues supporters.


Yet your personal actions and those of certain individuals within the senior hierarchy of the SBT have totally ignored this ethos!


Your own deeds betray your real motives.


As an aside, to LAST, why would you support someone or something you are diametrically opposed to? As for the tust people, I have now had numerous dealings with members of the trust board, so I can now base my opinion on personal dealings, so I fail to see your argument!


And also doesn't any organisation that receives payment have to be able to justify those payments? Certainly if I ran a group myself, any criticism of me for not doing I had promised to do would be utterly justified! As such the SBT deserves criticism for breaking promises.


You say you defend anyone - yet I haven't seen you defend me!



Also haven't you said for a while now you aren't a member of the trust LAST? Didn't you say you are not a member, yet will support every campaign! Now you are attending the AGM - which is SOLELY for members of the trust!

But how can that be LAST - you said you attacked me for saying you were a member LAST! Now you are taking time off work to attend the AGM - an occassion SOLELY for members of the trust!

Oh dear did you forget that you have been pretending NOT to be a member of the trust for the past month or so?

Seems when I said you were a member, and you called me a fucking idiot, I was right!

Seems LAST has been lying about a few things!
 

psgm1

Banned
So exactly why aren't you a member?

You attend every event possible (you claim), yet not prepared to spend £1 !!!

You don't see how utterly implausible that stance is? Why haven't you joined if you back them so much?

I appreciate you are copying Fisher, and once you have told a lie you have to keep telling that lie, but comne on, just admit it! Why are you so ashamed to say you are a member of the clique?

Mind you saying that I would be ashamed if I was a member of that deceitful, self obsessed wastes of vittels!

If you wont join them why? If you agree with their actions so much, it just shows an extremely miserly attitude noit to pay £1, or you have been banned! Either way by Not joining that says more about you than anything else!

Maybe you don't agree with their constitution, but why would that stop you? Certainly the board only pay lip service to it!

And as you claim, you are quite prepared to take time off work!.

You take people to be as gormless and ill-informed as yourself!

No wonder you defend the clique so much!
 

covmark

Well-Known Member
263 posts on this thread obviously the biggest problem that we as Coventry fans have got at the moment is The Trust :facepalm::facepalm::facepalm:

Who said the trust is the biggest problem we have. People just feel strongly about the way the trust are going about things, admittedly the thread has turned into a bit of a playground feud, but towards the beginning of it there were some very valid points raised
 

Broken Hearted Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
So exactly why aren't you a member?

You attend every event possible (you claim), yet not prepared to spend £1 !!!

You don't see how utterly implausible that stance is? Why haven't you joined if you back them so much?

I appreciate you are copying Fisher, and once you have told a lie you have to keep telling that lie, but comne on, just admit it! Why are you so ashamed to say you are a member of the clique?

Mind you saying that I would be ashamed if I was a member of that deceitful, self obsessed wastes of vittels!

If you wont join them why? If you agree with their actions so much, it just shows an extremely miserly attitude noit to pay £1, or you have been banned! Either way by Not joining that says more about you than anything else!

Maybe you don't agree with their constitution, but why would that stop you? Certainly the board only pay lip service to it!

And as you claim, you are quite prepared to take time off work!.

You take people to be as gormless and ill-informed as yourself!

No wonder you defend the clique so much!
To help you out yet again he explained why he is no longer a member to you and others numerous times I appreciate that you havent got the time to read posts properly because it gets in the way of your essay writting but suggest you read posts properly before replying. Just a thought:p
 

letsallsingtogether

Well-Known Member
Read my Post I was a member but due to your Ravings and threats to the trust on this forum myself and broken hearted decided to resign I have let them keep the pound and by the way I have never lied I do not need to:mad:.

I have answered all your questions now answer mine why have you been sending treats to other posters on here????

Or are you the hypocrite I take you for?
 

covmark

Well-Known Member
Read my Post I was a member but due to your Ravings and threats to the trust on this forum myself and broken hearted decided to resign I have let them keep the pound and by the way I have never lied I do not need to:mad:.

I have answered all your questions now answer mine why have you been sending treats to other posters on here????

Or are you the hypocrite I take you for?

Oooh treats, what were they and why didn't I get any
 

letsallsingtogether

Well-Known Member
Wanted to take out legal action against the trust as the members have to stick to trust codes and are not allowed freedom of speech in his opinion....
As for other treats to posters I will let him answer them? If he dares.....
Oooh treats, what were they and why didn't I get any
 

ajsccfc

Well-Known Member
All these 'there are bigger things to worry about' and 'at least they're trying' posts are being saved up the next time anyone says a bad word about David Bell or Steven Pressley. Sweet, sweet hypocrisy.
 

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
All these 'there are bigger things to worry about' and 'at least they're trying' posts are being saved up the next time anyone says a bad word about David Bell or Steven Pressley. Sweet, sweet hypocrisy.

Don't know why but I've got a bad feeling about Pressley-just seems to be a more erudite but bizarrely more scruffy version of Thorn.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top