Latest Trust Email (7 Viewers)

ajsccfc

Well-Known Member
Thorn always had that cockney gangland vibe that unsettled me a little. I could see Pressley being a criminal ringleader on Taggart. Robins, maybe a pickpocket on Midsummer Murders.
 

psgm1

Banned
That is absolute priceless!

This dingbat left the trust because of ME! Bless the ickle diddums!!!

Never heardn such BS in my life! Surely if anything you would have joined up!

Do you not realise when you are in a whole stop digging!

So you are so dedicated to these people that you leave them the moment someone criticises them?

And you aren't a moron? I'd contest that is the very definition - at the very least it is utterly illogical.

But logic or reason clearly aren't your strongpoints are they!

You seem to be confusing contempt and disgust with threats. Or you simply do not understand the word properly.

And Broken brained is just as bad. You guys are classic examples of why the trust must never be allowed anywhere near the running of the club. It attracts these kind of nimrods. Utterly clueless, raving madmen.

You left because of me - priceless. With friends like you pair who needs enemies!
 

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
Thorn always had that cockney gangland vibe that unsettled me a little. I could see Pressley being a criminal ringleader on Taggart. Robins, maybe a pickpocket on Midsummer Murders.

Robins would be the cunning orchestrator behind the scenes. All it would take is a packet of Mr Porky's for Thorn and a deep fried Mars Bar for Pressley to snuff them out.
 

Broken Hearted Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
Who said the trust is the biggest problem we have. People just feel strongly about the way the trust are going about things, admittedly the thread has turned into a bit of a playground feud, but towards the beginning of it there were some very valid points raised
That was taking the piss my friend. Lets get down to it, the only time Mr Fisher asked the Trust for help as far as I know correct me if Im wrong,was when he asked the Trust to help him get the fans on board to play out of Coventry. He knew what the answer would be and he also knew what the reaction would be. There is no way that the Trust could say yes they would be called Quislings and I would be the first to say it.
Dialogue pointless we have had poll after poll letter after letter forums emails etc etc that have told Mr Fisher his plans are not acceptable to the vast majority of the fans has he listened? Has he published the results of his own poll? Has he taken up the various offers of mediation with Acl? Has he once listened to the fans? The answer is No
Now the Trust people are now saying the Trust has changed if it hadn't then I would be critical of them. Unless youve all been asleep for the past two or three months things have changed the situation has changed our future is in the balance so burning bridges is irrelevant ther were was a bridge but it was only open once and then it was raised by Mr Fisher
 

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
Pisser ,the Sunroofs will all be open in Smallheath and Sparkbrook tonight ,not that I have any problem with that I must hasten to add .

Another winnable final fecked up by a few moments of stupidity. At least we won the U20s WC rugby against Wales otherwise I would be a very grumpy fellow tonight indeed.
 
M

Ms_whiplash

Guest
As for all facts, no one knows all the facts, but I never profess to know all, just the ones I can prove!

Are you saying this wasn't in your minutes? Are you saying 2000 or so members is more than 10% of the fanbase of coventry (who can fill out the 32k stadium when inspired by a decent prospect of a match)? 10% of 32.

Or are you suggesting that it is not the stated aim of the SBT to get a place on the board? (If so I shall refer you to your website).

I am at a loss at to which fact I have got wrong?

I said that less than 100 people have turned up to all 3 protests. 9 to the first, 12 to the second and a couple of dozen to the last - Have I made a miscalculation? 9+12+24 does not add up to 100 in my calculations - what do you make that calculation out to be?

Or are you just using abuse because you are unable to answer my questions with a viable answer that will prove me wrong? Did you not say you would get back to me with the answers to the questions about the fighting fund over a week ago? Or have yo forgotten, and I need to reprint your response?

Heaven forbid you would tell a lie and say you would answer the questions, but never actually do so - that would be a gross betrayal of your membership - especially for a board member of the open honest and transparent SBT.

Just incase you "FORGOT" the questions, I shall remind you of a few:

1) What is the fighting fund for now?
2) Is the fighting fund still intended to pay for legal fees required to buy part of the club?
3) If you have no intention of buying anymore, will you return this fighting fund?
4) If not buying part of the club, and SBT is a "Not For Profit" group, how can you justify charging anymore?
5) Why have you got a board that is nearly double that needed by the Football League?

Sure you don't have to answer, but you also don't have to be part of the SBT. You said you would meet up in private, but why aren't you prepared to answer these questions in public - after all if you aren't prepared to answer these in public then you genuinely cannot refer to yourselves as open honest and transparent - sorry it just doesn't work like that!

You seem quite vociferous asking these type of questions of ACL & SiSU, yet not prepared to answer them yourself? You DID say you answer them - why haven't you? Wouldn't have been yet another attempt to silence me would it? That would be a clear breach of your own constitution, and as a member of the board, how can you expect others to follow your rules if the very writers of those rules refuse to abide by them!

I am not going to hold my breath awaiting your answer. Btw Is this comment what John Fletcher refers to as going out of your way to be respectful?


"Certainly Steve has been particularly polite and restrained"

This is what John Fletcher considers being "particularly polite and restrained"

"Your a very sad individual, you do not know al the facts."

"You are a real prat"

If John IS being truthful, then boy you must be so full of vile and bitching it must be so frustrating to be in the company of others! Perhaps it's time you resign from the trust, then your sad outbursts will not reflect disgracefully on the SBT! If you cannot treat people with courtesy you should not be a member of any board! Especially one that claims to speak for me!

So can we expect your resignation later ?

Just a thought!

Well Mr psgm1!!!!!!!
This is the first time I have ever logged onto SBT as I have never felt it necessary, however today I do!!
You are a complete and utter prat , I think most contributors to this fans forum must by now agree!!
The only reason for the utter nonsense YOU spout is because you must only be blessed with a one inch dick!!!!!!
Just a thought!!!!!!!!!!
 

ajsccfc

Well-Known Member
Robins would be the cunning orchestrator behind the scenes.

Now I'm picturing him as a Scooby Doo villain. Off comes the Robins mask and it was old Mr Ranson all along!

'I would have got away with it too if it wasn't for you pesky board members not letting me sign Carroll for 50p'
 

letsallsingtogether

Well-Known Member
ANSWER MY QUESTION THEN why have you threatened other users who have disagreed with you.

As for priceless you keep asking for Steve to Resign you say ALL 2000 members are morons!
look in the mirror
You will see an utter:jerkit:
That is absolute priceless!

This dingbat left the trust because of ME! Bless the ickle diddums!!!

Never heardn such BS in my life! Surely if anything you would have joined up!

Do you not realise when you are in a whole stop digging!

So you are so dedicated to these people that you leave them the moment someone criticises them?

And you aren't a moron? I'd contest that is the very definition - at the very least it is utterly illogical.

But logic or reason clearly aren't your strongpoints are they!

You seem to be confusing contempt and disgust with threats. Or you simply do not understand the word properly.

And Broken brained is just as bad. You guys are classic examples of why the trust must never be allowed anywhere near the running of the club. It attracts these kind of nimrods. Utterly clueless, raving madmen.

You left because of me - priceless. With friends like you pair who needs enemies!
 

Nick

Administrator
All these 'there are bigger things to worry about' and 'at least they're trying' posts are being saved up the next time anyone says a bad word about David Bell or Steven Pressley. Sweet, sweet hypocrisy.


Exactly, and as for them being picked on. It makes me wonder what done people see on sometimes
 

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
Now I'm picturing him as a Scooby Doo villain. Off comes the Robins mask and it was old Mr Ranson all along!

'I would have got away with it too if it wasn't for you pesky board members not letting me sign Carroll for 50p'

To be fair Pressley does have an uncanny resemblance to Shaggy:

StevenPressley_549737.jpg

Scooby+MI_Shaggy_Head+Shot_w+BG.jpg
 

Broken Hearted Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
That is absolute priceless!

This dingbat left the trust because of ME! Bless the ickle diddums!!!

Never heardn such BS in my life! Surely if anything you would have joined up!

Do you not realise when you are in a whole stop digging!

So you are so dedicated to these people that you leave them the moment someone criticises them?

And you aren't a moron? I'd contest that is the very definition - at the very least it is utterly illogical.

But logic or reason clearly aren't your strongpoints are they!

You seem to be confusing contempt and disgust with threats. Or you simply do not understand the word properly.

And Broken brained is just as bad. You guys are classic examples of why the trust must never be allowed anywhere near the running of the club. It attracts these kind of nimrods. Utterly clueless, raving madmen.

You left because of me - priceless. With friends like you pair who needs enemies!
Oh the abuse madmen dear me this is quite horribe you are.... I cant bring myself to say it
 

wingy

Well-Known Member
Well Mr psgm1!!!!!!!
This is the first time I have ever logged onto SBT as I have never felt it necessary, however today I do!!
You are a complete and utter prat , I think most contributors to this fans forum must by now agree!!
The only reason for the utter nonsense YOU spout is because you must only be blessed with a one inch dick!!!!!!
Just a thought!!!!!!!!!!
Welcome:welcome::welcome:

Great First post.
 
D

Deleted member 5849

Guest
There is far too much love of the !!!!!! on this board.
 

Nick

Administrator
Sorry, it wasn't that user, I got the wrong one :( I really should tripleb check before posting
 
Had this response from Peter Hanlon:

Dear James,

Thanks for your email. I have forwarded on your message to our Customer Service team who deal with enquiries such as yours.

They will be in touch with you in line with The Football League Customer Charter which is available on our website.

Best wishes

Peter


Maybe he even read it?! Maybe...
 

torchomatic

Well-Known Member
Dear Sky Blues Trust

Can I have my pound back?

Thanks
 

SkyBlue_Bear83

Well-Known Member
This thread was a time bomb waiting to go off from the original post

Great work from Nick with the original post, just sit back and wait for psgm to make the thread explode. Top entertainment
 

Astute

Well-Known Member
Just sat here and read all of this thread :eek:

I agree that the SBT should have seen what the members wanted to do next. How much of a majority would they need to take a course of action though? Could they even manage to make such a decision? Would 51% be enough? Only 49% would be unhappy then. After reading all of this I can see that we will never get 75% of fans agreeing to anything.

I remember the days when we either wanted something or not. As in a yes or no vote. Now we have Yes, No, Not Sure, Yes but only if, No but if.... :sleep:

What chance of we got of helping our predicament if we can't even decide on what we should do next? If name calling would help us we would be top of the league :wave:
 

Nick

Administrator
Have had a few reports of abusive messages via email and pm. Just a reminder that it is a criminal offence and a little bit petty ;)
 

edgy

Well-Known Member
They can keep my pound but I'm withdrawing my membership after that email. Not one penny more is a disasterous scheme to back.
 

torchomatic

Well-Known Member
Have had a few reports of abusive messages via email and pm. Just a reminder that it is a criminal offence and a little bit petty ;)

Whos getting them, Nick? The Trust? That's sad if so.

Sent from my Galaxy S4 using Tapatalk 2
 

letsallsingtogether

Well-Known Member
The one I have seen has been sent from Anti Trust posters to Trust members Not to the board members just normal members!!!

These were sent by the same people that come on here screaming blue murder.

I am just your average Sky Blues supporter I want my team to play in Coventry don't expect success (that would be hoping for too much) that is why I support anyone who is trying to help save my Club weather it be the SBT, CET, CWR or another Average Joe.

That is why I back anyone on here that has the same goal Sisu out and playing at the Ricoh to attack another City supporter because he is trying to do something is despicable/cowardice and then to do nothing oneself makes me think that they have to be from a different fan base to me, and rather strange that they post on a City site.

If you are happy with the way Sisu run the club and Happy we are moving away then fair enough but to course a Civil War when you are on the same side is just treacherous!!!


:blue::blue:



Whos getting them, Nick? The Trust? That's sad if so.

Sent from my Galaxy S4 using Tapatalk 2
 

Nick

Administrator
The one I have seen has been sent from Anti Trust posters to Trust members Not to the board members just normal members!!!

These were sent by the same people that come on here screaming blue murder.

I am just your average Sky Blues supporter I want my team to play in Coventry don't expect success (that would be hoping for too much) that is why I support anyone who is trying to help save my Club weather it be the SBT, CET, CWR or another Average Joe.

That is why I back anyone on here that has the same goal Sisu out and playing at the Ricoh to attack another City supporter because he is trying to do something is despicable/cowardice and then to do nothing oneself makes me think that they have to be from a different fan base to me, and rather strange that they post on a City site.

If you are happy with the way Sisu run the club and Happy we are moving away then fair enough but to course a Civil War when you are on the same side is just treacherous!!!


:blue::blue:

Can you also report them to me if they are going through the site? What is ironic is that the trust are encouraging email spam and to send SISU / The FL etc emails but are moaning about getting them themselves?

If they are threatening and over the line, it is wrong whoever they are to.
 

SkyBlueSwiss

New Member
Can you also report them to me if they are going through the site? What is ironic is that the trust are encouraging email spam and to send SISU / The FL etc emails but are moaning about getting them themselves?

If they are threatening and over the line, it is wrong whoever they are to.



Nick,
You are starting to worry me.
As you surely must know, abusive pm's are very different to open e-mails to SISU/FL, so why are you putting them in the same basket? Why do you flippantly call them "spam" when you know they are nothing of the kind?
I myself - as a member of the Trust - am somewhat disappointed with their actions to date and hope that the AGM puts some more competent people on the board, but surely this is uncalled for.
This thread that you have started is full of vitriol against the Trust, and your comments are becoming quite bitter where the trust is concerned compared to your normally level headed contributions.
What is going on here?
 

Nick

Administrator
Nick,
You are starting to worry me.
As you surely must know, abusive pm's are very different to open e-mails to SISU/FL, so why are you putting them in the same basket? Why do you flippantly call them "spam" when you know they are nothing of the kind?
I myself - as a member of the Trust - am somewhat disappointed with their actions to date and hope that the AGM puts some more competent people on the board, but surely this is uncalled for.
This thread that you have started is full of vitriol against the Trust, and your comments are becoming quite bitter where the trust is concerned compared to your normally level headed contributions.
What is going on here?

Why is an abusive email to a trust member any different to an abusive email to Sisu / ACL or the football league? They are all wrong in my opinion.

Encouraging Trust Members to send emails (which are classed as spam / unsolicited emails) is wrong and looks bad no matter who they are addressed to.

Why am I not being level headed by saying it is wrong to whoever it is to or is it ok to send emails and post how bad SISU / ACL / The Football League are doing things wrong but if somebody says the trust are doing some things wrong (in their opinion) it is out of order? Surely by saying it is wrong to send abuse to a random member on here, a man in the street, Tim Fisher, Joy Seppala, people at ACL, people at the Football league is quite balanced and level headed?

I seem to be getting a bit of stick because I haven't turned into a "SISU OUT" chanter and can see every side to a story?
 

Grappa

Well-Known Member
I myself - as a member of the Trust - am somewhat disappointed with their actions to date and hope that the AGM puts some more competent people on the board.

From the email they sent out today:

"Board Members were all elected in 2012 for a 2 year period so there will be no elections at the 2013 AGM"
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top