James Smith
Well-Known Member
Forget SISU and think about the football club for a minute.
The offer on the table now is absolutely a good rent deal and reduces expenditure for the football club which is great, but it doesn't help the football club one jot with income for FFP calculation.
My view is and has always been that the football club adds value to the Ricoh as a business way beyond match days, and should have access . For example the naming rights to the arena will IMHO not have the same income value in future without CCFC.
As PWKH pointed out some time ago "match day revenues are not sufficient to make any real difference to the gap between the other commercial incomes of the Club and the wages. In order to have a self-sufficient club which does not rely on pulling in money every years as loans or investments or whatever it needs to have 365 days a year income. That was the business model that drove the design of the Ricoh."
Yes the rent was too high, but we wouldn't be in this position if SISU had apporached ACL and negotiated in the first place instead of just blundering on with the rent boycott. HAd they done things in a calm and civilised way we could have owned at least half of ACL and be negotiating with the council for the rest and possibly a loner lease.
ACL could just have kicked us out after the escrow ran out and to be honest that would have well and truly f*cked us. The fact that the didn't and have they've made this offer is either because they don't want the team to move because Coventry City Football Club belongs in Coventry, or because they're desperate for the money. You decide - I know what I think.
Last edited: