Sorry Cheshire but here we go again...more unsubstantiated comments. Prove to me where SISU have 'stated' they will only negotiate to buy the arena on their terms?
What you go on to speculate is also far fetched rubbish. I could do the same and suggest they will get the arena and then clearly sell it on with the football club for a return on their original investment? But you know that would be pure speculation on my part, can't possibly happen could it?
As for the free rent this season. I made this comment some time ago. Why not? Who stands to lose out if such a deal was in place? match day cost apart this would benefit everybody. problem is drawing a line in the sand and letting go of ego's on both sides before any such idea can be possible.
Pax. Here is the statement taken from the CT
""It is interesting to note Mr Fisher’s failure to mention Ms Seppala’s verbal statement during this meeting, made in the presence of her own lawyers that the only circumstance in which the Club would return to the Ricoh would be upon SISU assuming full ownership of the venue without any negotiation on purchase price.
"Ms Seppala also stated at this meeting her intention to continue to threaten ACL and its shareholders with expensive litigation at every possible opportunity.
http://www.coventrytelegraph.net/sp...news/coventry-city-ricoh-landlord-acl-5582877 for the full text. Now I know its not conclusive proof, but It wasn't retracted and they have not sued the CT yet. And its broadly in the same park as Fishers claims on CWR.
With regards making predictions, which can only be speculation or conjecture as none of us know all of the facts or how either party will respond to different situations, I suggest what I predict may happen, you have a different view, that's absolutely fine. But your last paragraph suggest you have double standards. Look in the mirror!