Marlon without a Club (12 Viewers)

SkyblueBazza

Well-Known Member
Maybe you should look up the actual facts of the case(s) of assault against women that Marlon King has.

Fed up of his apologists before, "She asked for it", "Split-tail deserved it" etc.

http://www.theguardian.com/football/2009/oct/29/marlon-king-criminal-career

Nasty piece of work, and somebody worthy of a NOPM campaign.

Don't get me wrong here - not suggesting what anyone ought to think...merely considering different attitudes.
For the actual facts I would have to have been there & seen, & heard & applied my own interpretation.
I am in full agreement with you though from what I do see & hear, which are other's reports, he is a very unpleasant character. So are lots of others. In our society once someone serves their time our benevolent, forgiving society tries to draw a line under the incident. Could/should/would an employer with such a strong conscience give a job to someone who has defrauded an elderly person out of their life savings, but served their time, a job? Or would that be discrimination?
 

Last edited:

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
Should never have signed the c**t, just another sign of the moral degradation of SISU.

More so than not paying an inflated rent.

Bollocks. He's a free man and innocent until proven guilty on other crimes.

Giving him a job is how we as a society have agreed to work. Just like honouring signed contracts.

How much you like him doesn't change the agreed system, just like how much you like the terms of the contract you signed.

I don't want to live in a society that punishes people by mob law as opposed to an agreed judicial system. If I did I'd move to Afghanistan.

Is this GMK circa 2010?
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
Bollocks. He's a free man and innocent until proven guilty on other crimes.

Giving him a job is how we as a society have agreed to work. Just like honouring signed contracts.

How much you like him doesn't change the agreed system, just like how much you like the terms of the contract you signed.

I don't want to live in a society that punishes people by mob law as opposed to an agreed judicial system. If I did I'd move to Afghanistan.

Is this GMK circa 2010?

So you'd have had no problem if Lee Hughes had signed for us after his release?
 

lordsummerisle

Well-Known Member
Bollocks. He's a free man and innocent until proven guilty on other crimes.

Giving him a job is how we as a society have agreed to work. Just like honouring signed contracts.

How much you like him doesn't change the agreed system, just like how much you like the terms of the contract you signed.

I don't want to live in a society that punishes people by mob law as opposed to an agreed judicial system. If I did I'd move to Afghanistan.

Is this GMK circa 2010?

With the level of mysogyny shown on here today I think we might be on GMK around 2010.

You'll be posting soon about how great SISU are and anybody who thinks different obviously knows nothing about how businesses are run to totally bring back that "vibe".

If the offender isn't rehabilitated or shows any sign of remorse or guilt for his actions then no, he doesn't deserve a 14th chance.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top