Didn't see anybody moan when we were winning, with the same players I may add.
Now we have lost ONE game its back to players being shit at defending. Such a fickle bunch!
In our previous 3 games we'd only conceded 2 goals. Today, the whole team played badly in the second half, hence us conceding twice. It wasn't necessarily an issue of the defenders playing badly.
The most pressing issue is defending set-pieces. That I'll agree is a weakness.
Some Cov fans do love an over-reaction.
16 goals against in 8 games, to me i would say theres a bit of a problem at the back, Hey but i'm no Einstein.
There are only 4 teams that have conceded more goals in the league than us and they lie in 17th, 19th, 21st and 23rd.
If we hadn't been deducted the 10 points we would be something like 8th.
Based on this would you say we are somewhat fragile at the back?
And 22 goals scored.
Cov fans have been moaning for years about negative, dour, defensive football where we never score more than 1 or 2 in a game. Now we regularly score 2 or more and people start moaning about the goals against column.
As has been said in the match thread, we're not Real Madrid or Man United. We won't win every game, and we're not capable yet of being brilliant in both attack and defence.
I'd much rather watch us go for goals but be a bit vulnerable at the back than vice-versa.
We conceded a lot last season, even under robins with 2 recognised centre backs and a 5 man midfield containing. 2 defensive midfielders.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - so please excuse and spelling or grammar errors
You are missing the point totally.
No-one is bemoaning our attacking style but it would be nice to have some recognised centre backs actually playing at centre back in order to give us a bit of protection. Surely if we are playing this style and are clearly going to be vulnerable at the back then some recognised defenders playing in their recognised positions might be a good idea?
We have to wake up to the position we are in as a club. Scrap any idea of promotion, its a case of work with what we have. It may not be possible to get these players in he wants. Keegan style football may at the minute be whats best
Completely agree, however, it is plain to see that we are pretty weak at the back.
Yet people are arguing that we are not. Whether Pressley can do anything about it is a totally different thing.
Jordan Clarke at CB is fundamental to our attacking play. If we can find a physically imposing centre back with his composure and ability on the ball available on a free then sure, let's get him in. I doubt we'll find one though.
In addition, many people have Jordan Clarke down as their MOTM today. He's not as big a problem as he's made out to be.
Defending was poor for the goals. Nothing we didn't already know.
I'm lost! So on that basis we should weaken the defence even more because we were conceding goals anyway?
Completely agree, however, it is plain to see that we are pretty weak at the back.
Yet people are arguing that we are not. Whether Pressley can do anything about it is a totally different thing.
He's brought in an 18 year old who is going to be a back up.
But as I said he is not really destined for the first 11 is he? Also is SP trying to say there aren't any decent kids in the coventry area - why else bring in a kid from north of the border just to put intp the academy. I appreciate he came out with a statement saying he wanted to build up the scottish national squad, but should he be doing it at the expense of local kids.He's brought in an 18 year old who is going to be a back up.