Broken Hearted Sky Blue
Well-Known Member
Obviously you think the Ricoh is a shithole due to your question so therefore should Sisu get the Ricoh I trust you wont be buying a season ticket:thinking about:
19,726 total support in 9 Games (6 Viewers)
- Thread starter savosdad
- Start date
Obviously you think the Ricoh is a shithole due to your question so therefore should Sisu get the Ricoh I trust you wont be buying a season ticket:thinking about:
"stating the obvious" you can say that again old pal.
shmmeee
Well-Known Member
"online reputation management" or astroturfing isn't a conspiracy, neither is good old fashioned trolling. You are one or the other, it's that or the highly unlikely answer that you are either a severely autistic person who has no idea of how to act with sensitivity around others, or a severely damaged individual who believes they can only get "bad" attention and are not worthy of "good" attention and so refuse to engage in anything other than taunts and insults.
But for me, Occam's Razor suggests you are a good old fashioned, not particularly subtle, troll. As such I will make my usual plea to those engaging you:
Please do not feed the trolls.
quite the opposite actually, looking forward to being given first choice of seats back at the Ricoh...
shmmeee
Well-Known Member
He's a scab to you, but not to anyone not boycotting because of King. It's the right word whatever you think. People are breaking a boycott/strike.
So to answer your question, yes. Who is a scab depends on the position of the person calling the names.
ah that old canard again...must be a troll because people are getting upset. Spare the wikipedia psychobabble. I think you will find there is much more than taunts or insults in my posts, but you read what you want to into them. Are you a board moderator by the way? Cus you act all bolshy like you are like
D
Deleted member 5849
Guest
Throwing out moral judgements is a dangerous game, it always lends people open to having to look in the mirror.
And that's a dangerous place to look for many of us.
It's also entirely the wrong word too. Many of the people not going are just not going because the club's been taken away to a place it shouldn't be. It's not a concerted 'campaign' for most, more the removal of practicality.
The fundamentalist minority however, who spend their time spouting the same old same old must surely be the ultimate SISU plants in all this hopwever.
Because who else than people attempting to divide and rule would attempt to divide? Be it non attendance at Sixfields because of NOPM, non attendance because of prqacticality, attendance under duress, or attendance because you believe absolutely this is the way to a long term future and wish to support it... or attendance because your pet gerbil really loves the beefburgers, we are all united in one thing.
Like it or not, we're fans of the same fucking club.
So why the constant desire of a vocal minority to impose their own morals on that, and split some into non-fans?
It goes beyond 'banter' and heads towards cuntishness.
covmark
Well-Known Member
No one is a fucking scab, wheres the picket line? sick to the back teeth of jumped up pricks like you labelling people, just because they've chosen a different course of action to you. Pull your fucking head out of your arse.
Last edited:
torchomatic
Well-Known Member
handbags in the middle of the room please ladies, round 1....
bigfatronssba
Well-Known Member
I have to take issue with you for claiming fans are divided.
90% of fans are adamant that they wont go to Sixfields. That isn't a divided fan base, its a united one.
Let me put it this way, had attendances only dropped by 10% this season (roughly 1100 people) would you still say the fanbase was divided? Or would you say for it to only drop by 1100 despite moving meant that the fanbase was willing to watch the club in Northampton?
He is right though. I and the others have taken a fairly easy/cowardly stance and then come on here crowing about it. In the truest sense of the word, scab is probably the right term. Im still going to go though and encourage others to do the same - doesnt make what I am doing morally right though.
D
Deleted member 5849
Guest
The only attempts to divide are by the fucking morons determined to questuion and belittle peoples' personality by their leisure choices.
Not like they're raping small children is it? And you never know, their approach may actually prove the best in the end.
Just the same as those of us who were shouted down and told we should be happy to have some ruthless good business sense take us over when we voiced... doubts were, well, proven right in the end.
And if attendance numbers were high that wouldn't say in the slightest people were happy. Mere quantitative by itself doesn;t show that in the slightest.
Else 30,000 were wanking themselves off to a pro-SISU fury when we played Crewe.
bigfatronssba
Well-Known Member
I don't agree with name calling, and that goes on from both camps, but if I think that someone is wrong for going to Sixfields then I don't see why in a free society I cant tell them that.
Nonleagueherewecome
Well-Known Member
Nonleagueherewecome
Well-Known Member
Why are you suddenly banging on about everyone who attended when King was here? That's got nothing to do with the current issues and is completely different. I'm sure you're trying to make some kind of smart-Alec point, but it's so far up it's own arse, it's lost on me!
Grendel
Well-Known Member
What are you? The thinking man's Italiahorse?
D
Deleted member 5849
Guest
It's not a hard one to work out...
bigfatronssba
Well-Known Member
Its lost on me I've got to be honest.
skybluetony176
Well-Known Member
using that train of thought that must mean that andrea b is the thinking mans grendull
Nonleagueherewecome
Well-Known Member
The moral decision over King is regarding a moral matter that has nothing to do with football. He had served his time-is football aloft from society in that it doesn't forgive or allow recuperation? A small minority of fans boycotted over the clubs decision to employ him, as is their right. I didn't, although I found the "she said yes" songs incredibly distasteful and made my views clear to those around me singing them.
SISU moving the club to Northampton has produced a much clearer boycott. Even if you take away the fans who can't get to Sixfields, it's still a clear majority of fans who are choosing not to attend. The majority of supporters are united in their displeasure at a decision taken by the clubs owners. I know you don't like "the power of the majority", but in a society that believes in democracy, you'll have to accept that it carries some weight.
This is a moral decision entirely to do with football, unlike the King one. The boycott with King had no clear purpose other than to register dissatisfaction: they were hardly going to get rid of him. The boycott of Sixfields is doing that, but also attempting to make SISU's situation tougher to bear-you can argue that they can afford it until you're blue in the face, but if there were zero home fans there, they would be losing even more money and look even more ridiculous than an average attendance of around 2,000 makes them look.
If I've missed your point, do elaborate, but for a man who likes to be condescending about other peoples analogies, you're posting a particularly crap one yourself.
Nonleagueherewecome
Well-Known Member
It was sorta me saying that which prompted his weak attempt at an insult, read above!
D
Deleted member 5849
Guest
It's not an analogy.
What's the point of bothering when there's a bit of closed minded scabbing to be done?
Seriously.
What. Is. The. Point?
City fans, best at slitting their own throats.
Sky Blue Dal
Well-Known Member
Why bring up ACL everytime. Don't understand what you trying to get at.
This is about SISU who packed there suitcases and left without a thought for the fans and what the consequences of this would lead to. They way under estimated the 7000 fans at sixfield if they did well.
ACL at the moment are still tagging along comfortably without the football club. They seem to still be running there business as normal but what has that has got to do with running a football club which this post is referring to. The club washed there hands of ACL did they not?? I don't know why you insist on bringing up ACL for everything when analysing the finances of the club. They are a separate entity.
When it has come to running our football club then yes, SISU have been incompetent.
Last edited:
No future with SISU
New Member
So in your opion they are not fans or more importantly supporters if they do not have season tickets.
No future with SISU
New Member
Did you leave early?
skybluetony176
Well-Known Member
regarding you're last point. that depends on what you are trying to achive by ruining, sorry running a football club.
as fans of CCFC we expect that to be creating the right atmosphere for the club to prosper in the footballing world.
however if you are a sh1tsu investor (remember they are the only group off people that joy diversion cares about outside of her family) you expect that to be fuck anyone over in order to gain as much financially by any means at whatever cost to your original asset purchase.
so from the later point off view they may well be doing a very good job, should they land the ricoh for a bargain.
skybluefred
New Member
The gutter language does you no justice and doesn't help your cause.
skybluefred
New Member
You will probably find that sisu have done so much damage to the fan base, that even if they return to the Ricoh they
will be very hard pushed to get a decent attendance. The first rule for a successful business is keep your customers
happy.To this end sisu have been an abject failure and do not deserve any support.
:blue:
Grendel
Well-Known Member
He has no cause this isn't a political struggle you buffoon.
Very hard pushed to get a decent attendance, well lets all fucking give up now then, and hope we never return as if we did not get a minimum 15,000 first game back ( if we ever go back) then it would be a major embarrassment and many a fan around the UK would laugh their knackers off at us