Warwickhunt
Well-Known Member
I did not read where they said NO!!! like all politicians they say everything & nothing
nuneaton say no (8 Viewers)
- Thread starter wince
- Start date
RoboCCFC90
Well-Known Member
Not me unfortunately, just everything seems to make less sense with every news story or public statement.
I wish I was going to the Stadium Forum tonight now.. Feck!!
Getting answers from Fisher though is like getting blood from a stone..
Rusty Trombone
Well-Known Member
How could any Council rule out future contact? I couldn't rule out ever seeing Pippa Middleton in the shower at the gym, but I'm only giving it another 3-5 years.
skybluetony176
Well-Known Member
it was building an academy at ryton training ground. you know, the academy that is going to be part of the stadium development.
Astute
Well-Known Member
They have to tell the truth. They tried to do a 'no comment' that backfired. Their latest comment is very clear. Unless you want to make excuses up for SISUE that is.
Rusty Trombone
Well-Known Member
I reckon he'll have loads of answers, this stuff is only news to us, he's known this was coming since he first said it.
Warwickhunt
Well-Known Member
The wording they have been approached by a third party says it all, SISU would not approach the councils but there representatives would and they are covered by the data protection act away from what ML has been saying which allows the council to rebuttle his response.
skybluetony176
Well-Known Member
said NO!! to what exactly? there is NO!! proposal to say NO!! too. surely that much is clear to you?
italiahorse
Well-Known Member
So who are the 2 councils that Sisu are talking too at this moment in time?
Its bull£ht and it needs to be put to Sisu.
Astute
Well-Known Member
The best place to build a stadium has been built on. It is where the Ricoh was built. That is why about 25m was spent decontaminating the land it was built on.
All SISUE have done so far has been making enquiries on land where they had no chance of getting permission. There is a good chance they knew this. Or they thought it would be a lot easier than it is. They are used to doing what they want but not used to building anything. Maybe this is why Timothy recently said they might still rent the Ricoh. They are running out of alternatives. They are running out of time to get plans moving. Running out of time to pretend they will build something.
All SISUE have done so far has been making enquiries on land where they had no chance of getting permission. There is a good chance they knew this. Or they thought it would be a lot easier than it is. They are used to doing what they want but not used to building anything. Maybe this is why Timothy recently said they might still rent the Ricoh. They are running out of alternatives. They are running out of time to get plans moving. Running out of time to pretend they will build something.
RoboCCFC90
Well-Known Member
You seem confident Rusty, I can't help feel like that there is something missing..
RoboCCFC90
Well-Known Member
Thing is Astute it's not even been six months did anyone expect a turnaround in Planning Permission in that time?
italiahorse
Well-Known Member
It is the process.
I wanted to develop some of my land and set up a meeting with the Nuneaton Council officers which tied up 2 officers for over an hour..
I presented my proposals and on each case was told I had no chance because of .........
Left the meeting knowing how they would process any outline planning permission request I might consider putting in and it cost me nothing.
If I wanted to I could tell my Mrs that the meeting went well and they would accept an application for outline planning permission.
Don't have to tell her what would happen to it though but I could live the moment.
RoboCCFC90
Well-Known Member
Read my reponse to Chief Dave, I did say that Sisu have contacted Two Councils not that there in constant dialogue.
oldskyblue58
CCFC Finance Director
isn't the key phrase from N&B the following
"we are therefore not considering any proposal for any particular location"
that means there is no proposal for the exhall site that they are considering for example. It would also mean they have not asked for an economic impact report on any site wouldn't it because that would form part of any considerations they have to make.
"we are therefore not considering any proposal for any particular location"
that means there is no proposal for the exhall site that they are considering for example. It would also mean they have not asked for an economic impact report on any site wouldn't it because that would form part of any considerations they have to make.
italiahorse
Well-Known Member
RoboCCFC90
Well-Known Member
In English??
italiahorse
Well-Known Member
They did say they are not in any discussions with any party now. So who is Tim talking too ?
RoboCCFC90
Well-Known Member
Fishing...
oldskyblue58
CCFC Finance Director
clearly they have talked (or their agents have) to two local councils .... Rugby & Nuneaton and Bedworth..... It has gone no further than an initial chat it would seem. Has either council taken it further, it would seem not. Is an economic impact report part of what would be needed yes but it seems from what is reported no council has requested one but the agents acting for SISU might of course. Has real progress been made in finding a new site for a new stadium been made, it doesn't look like it but clearly we need a statement from the club to clarify that Are there items there that could tick boxes at the FL for now probably. But until there is definite proof from the club one way or another we are stuck at Sixfields or worse
Last edited:
italiahorse
Well-Known Member
Once you get an area of land with permission for pitches etc the next step is slightly easier.
If you want to put up some buildings it may be easier to get permission as the green belt status has already been changed.
chiefdave
Well-Known Member
You might not of said that but Fisher and Labovich both did. We know, at best, they have spoken to one council about a new ground and it was a tentative enquiry which has not been followed up on.
How does that tie up with Fisher and Labovich saying they were in talks with two councils about a new stadium, not training ground, and were asked to prepare various reports and assesments?
Delboycov
Active Member
In fairness there are a couple on here...I don't think there is much doubt that the recent statements made about talks taking place regarding a new site have been exposed as at best gross exaggeration...and some would say at worst lies. Can't believe anyone is still giving them the benefit of the doubt!
italiahorse
Well-Known Member
It was aimed at TF comments not ones from your good self.
sky blue john
Well-Known Member
Maybe they are all back at gmk ?
You could have field day on gmk today. Sadly i'm not a member.
RoboCCFC90
Well-Known Member
I agree, from the Council's (Nuneaton & Beduff, Rugby) statement's in the media, neither have had discussions with any such purpose with the Club as Fisher/Labradoodle had perceived.
"not been followed up on" - Not yet it hasn't this remains to be seen, I am very skeptical about it though.
magic82ball
New Member
Yes but your wrong Robbo.
1 council has been approached regarding ground and 1 has been approached regarding training complex (which I would guess was for Cat 2 training centre for the kids) So 2 councils have not been contacted regarding stadium.
hill83
Well-Known Member
I tell you what, if that was the case I would be in prison within the week.
RoboCCFC90
Well-Known Member
"Sometimes you back the wrong horse"
chiefdave
Well-Known Member
I just had a look on there. It's quite sad how excited they all are about the CT article last night and how it's proof that SISU really are building a stadium.