PVA

Well-Known Member
Apr 22, 2011
14,492
14,097
263
I think they've signed him permanently, club record transfer.

It's good news for us, I expected Robins to come in for Clarke
 

ccfcway

Well-Known Member
Mar 20, 2011
26,642
9,041
263
They are saying its a club record, beating the £1.2 million they paid previously. If they paid anywhere near 1.3 - 1.5 million they have a decent signing there !

Certainly make you think about Wilson / Clarke
 

SkyBlue_Bear83

Well-Known Member
Oct 16, 2010
18,745
2,593
213
Yet CWR keep swearing that Huddersfield offered 1.5 million for Christie in the summer
 

Stafford_SkBlue

Well-Known Member
Jan 27, 2013
464
45
28
Yes it was a loan becoming permanent - the loan allowed him to play yesterday, which he did and scored.
Also with Bamford gone to Derby, (on the bench yesterday) two League 1 top scorers have left the League, both were on 14 goals same as Wilson.
 

hill83

Well-Known Member
Sep 15, 2008
20,715
32,554
363
Coventry
Yet CWR keep swearing that Huddersfield offered 1.5 million for Christie in the summer

So £1.2m is still a record signing for them then, because they didn't sign Christie, whether you believe the number or not.
 

stupot07

Well-Known Member
Mar 20, 2011
31,164
9,835
313
Wells fee is undisclosed


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - so please excuse any spelling or grammar errors :)
 

SkyBlue_Bear83

Well-Known Member
Oct 16, 2010
18,745
2,593
213
So £1.2m is still a record signing for them then, because they didn't sign Christie, whether you believe the number or not.

Even if they signed Christie then Wells would still be a record deal for them, only mugs an idiots would believe otherwise
 

torchomatic

Well-Known Member
Feb 25, 2008
25,331
10,533
313
Warwick
Can only be a good sign. WIlson is injured anyway and Clarke does seem to be a little injury prone, so I don't worry about it. I think we'll keep hold of them.
 

SkyBlue_Bear83

Well-Known Member
Oct 16, 2010
18,745
2,593
213
They play different positions; how has Christie come into this? Maybe they want a RB and A striker?

I apologise for bringing up something Coventry related on a Coventry forum in the main Coventry section on a thread about Wells and Huddersfield
 

hill83

Well-Known Member
Sep 15, 2008
20,715
32,554
363
Coventry
No need to :D

I just meant i couldn't see the link between them buying Wells and them wanting Christie too.

There isn't. Neither is there a link between what they paid for him and a speculated offer for another player.
Which is why I commented.
 

SkyBlue_Bear83

Well-Known Member
Oct 16, 2010
18,745
2,593
213
Just highlighting how ludicrous it is that they bid 1.5 million for Christie which CWR seem to state as fact every other game
 

sw88

Chief Commentator!
Aug 7, 2009
26,983
5,629
313
Coventry
Just highlighting how ludicrous it is that they bid 1.5 million for Christie which CWR seem to state as fact every other game

Even though he's out of contract in the summer, I'd say this probably a right valuation for him,although due to his contract issue I think we'd be lucky to get that for him and would surely have to consider it a serious bid
 

Longford

Member
Jun 15, 2013
162
15
118
Just highlighting how ludicrous it is that they bid 1.5 million for Christie which CWR seem to state as fact every other game

It was certainly £1m plus
 

SkyBlue_Bear83

Well-Known Member
Oct 16, 2010
18,745
2,593
213
Anyway I'll let you lot get back to discussing Nakhi Wells signing for Huddersfield in the main Coventry section of a Coventry forum.
 

wingy

Well-Known Member
Jul 9, 2011
35,112
9,050
263
Bright start.

Bit disturbed by Waggot comments In program ,referred to by CWR,suggesting only likely to get a couple In ,maybe six month deals or loans.

EDIT wrong thread .
 

Users who are viewing this thread