administration? was the media reports that sisu appointed Paul Appleton as administrator incorrect? clearly i'm not an intellect like you but i always thought that the person putting the company into administration appointed the administrator?
A juvenile statement - sisu put the club in administration to get their preferred administrator - The council submitted the papers to the court to place the club into administration and lined up Guilfoyle as their administrator. As ever they were outwitted by a highly predictable riposte.
clumsily attempting to change owners? did they? i don't know one way or the other and neither do you. its speculation at best and we all know you don't deal in speculation, especially when other people use it as an argument against you.
Wow are we going to make a rule that unless it is cast iron, concrete fact that it should not be on here? Could be interesting - I'll remind you of that in the future. I think its generally accepted by anyone and everyone that they tried (and as with the administration strategy) failed in their desired outcome. This was the prime objective and it backfired with catastrophic consequences for the club.
rejecting a CVA? ask yourself why where they in a position to reject the CVA, Oooo! that's right someone put the club in administration. remind me again who was that?
These two areas are not connected, I am not sure what you mean - I think the Oooo! comment shows emotion over practical debating ability or a curious attempt to do a Frank Spencer impression on a football forum. Either way the statement is idiotic and does not dignify a response.
charging 10 times the average rent? what is the average rent? where is your source?
We know that Forest, Ipswich, Swansea and Hull all were charged a tenth of our rent and I struggle to find many other council owned grounds in the Championship in the years we were charged the rent. That is my source - if there are others please let me know.
plus what is the average management fee's that clubs get charged? ours are double what the rent was and therefore a bigger financial burden on the club yet these never seem to concern you as much, infact i struggle to think of a single post where you even mention them let alone question them. still not to worry, they are not charged by ccc so surely cant be a real financial drain on the club.
Emotional and irrelevant other than to point out my beef with the council has long been before Sisu's tenure.
forcing the club to fund ACL in its infancy? care to elaborate? i would be interested to hear what brought you to this conclusion?
We paid their mortgage in its entirety and received a fraction of the benefit - not too hard a concept even for you to grasp.
offering subsequent reduced rental deals which when finer print is scrutinised appear not so attractive? they are moving in the right direction though and a good basis for negotiations to begin. instead sisu first of all said no offer had been made, David Conn made us aware that it was made through the FL, sisu then said that no direct offer had been made. at the end of the day its better than staying in Northampton playing to crowds of 2000 at best and hard to argue that it doesn't offer better financial rewards for the club. in other words it offers the club more revenue, isn't this what its supposed to be all about?
There are several strands of a debate here with little structure. The main point is that many of the offers claimed by ACL receive a rebuff from Sisu. Either way, the offers still fall below the clubs mentioned above and no club has ever been promoted to the Premiership with limited revenue streams. Go figure.
employing expensive PR companies to carefully word all their statements? hard to see how this works against CCFC but still i guess they needed to do something to counter the skills of 1 man PR machine ML.
Frankly if everyone was as gullible as you they could have employed Stuart Hall, Jimmy Saville and Rolf Harris and you'd believe everything they say. I can only assume they believe there is a more sceptical audience to actually take the action they have. Either way many of their statements are as disingenuous as their adversary.
so apart from SP what have Sisu ever done for us?
