17 year old george Thomas to get debut against orient (5 Viewers)

skybluejelly

Well-Known Member
According to telegraph Leon a major doubt ( there's a surprise) so Presley prepared to play 17 year old rookie..edit he's only 16
 

Last edited:

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
FFS, just pull the checkbook out and get Leon's replacement in.

Even if we don't sell him it seems we've lost the 30-a-season striker we had.
 

runner

Active Member
I must admit, not prejudging him ... but seriously to blood a striker in that's this age for such a crucial match is crazy. Don't get me wrong I believe in Pressley and I also believe he's not really placed a foot wrong since arriving, but this is desperacy surely. Leon is either going ... in which case we should, as shmmeee is saying get a replacement, or he's not ... but let's be honest, no one believes he is actually injured. And yes, I did see him get treatment on Friday night, but still not convinced.
 

Godiva

Well-Known Member
I must admit, not prejudging him ... but seriously to blood a striker in that's this age for such a crucial match is crazy. Don't get me wrong I believe in Pressley and I also believe he's not really placed a foot wrong since arriving, but this is desperacy surely. Leon is either going ... in which case we should, as shmmeee is saying get a replacement, or he's not ... but let's be honest, no one believes he is actually injured. And yes, I did see him get treatment on Friday night, but still not convinced.

Remember when we started a new season with central defense pairing of Cameron and Turner - McPake and Wood on the bench? We won and even kept a clean sheet.
Trust the manager - the generel consensus is that he knows what he is doing anyway. So at least reserve judgement till after the match.
 

Kingokings204

Well-Known Member
We are getting thrashed tomorrow night without Clarke and Wilson. Scoring has always been our strength as we cant defend. 4-0 tomorrow
 

Nick

Administrator
I don't get this Denzel and Urquart situation, why bother signing them and then playing 16 year olds in front of them? I understand that they might not be ready, but is it a good sign that our home bred 16 year olds are better?
 

Kingokings204

Well-Known Member
I guess you are right Nick but it shouldn't be this situation. Harwood went to hartlepool and Marlon King is a free agent. Not great but much better and goals in them than 16 year old kids in year 11 at school surely?
 

Nick

Administrator
I guess you are right Nick but it shouldn't be this situation. Harwood went to hartlepool and Marlon King is a free agent. Not great but much better and goals in them than 16 year old kids in year 11 at school surely?

Wages though?
 

hill83

Well-Known Member
This has obviously been forced on him due to injuries and other shite, but if Pressley feels he is ready who is anyone to say he is wrong.
Personally I'd prefer to see us sign C.Ronaldo on loan until the end of the season though.
 

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
Pressley has now said Dagnall didn't sign because we weren't willing to offer him a longer contract. He signed an 18 month deal with Leyton Orient.
 

JulianDarbyFTW

Well-Known Member
I don't get this Denzel and Urquart situation, why bother signing them and then playing 16 year olds in front of them? I understand that they might not be ready, but is it a good sign that our home bred 16 year olds are better?

I'd assume the lad has spent the past 12 months working with Pressley's system and knows how to play the role, whereas Denzel Slager hasn't had that luxury and would therefore make the team weaker..?
 

sw88

Chief Commentator!
I imagine Slager is considered one for the future, which does seen strange as he's much older than the rest of the academy lads. However when I've seen him he hasn't looked to offer us much.

Maund, now where's he? (Have asked on another post so apologies if it's been answered on that one)
 

Kingokings204

Well-Known Member
Wages though?

Fair point but if Hartlepool can afford him? and king is on no money at the moment he is unemployed so surely a half decent contract would tempt him. Both not the worlds best but 16-18 year olds are not good enough with no experience.
 

sky blue john

Well-Known Member
Fair point but if Hartlepool can afford
him? and king is on no money at the moment he is unemployed so surely a half decent contract would tempt him. Both not the worlds best but 16-18 year olds are not good enough with no experience.

So do you really think harewood and king would come in and play how SP wants them to play ???
Can you really see them pressing the opposition defence ???
 

Captain Dart

Well-Known Member
Transfer & loan activity in the remainder of the season will indicate where SISU are with regards supporting the playing side.

I have my suspicions about what will happen, but hard evidence is needed to confirm them.
 

Captain Dart

Well-Known Member
I don't get this Denzel and Urquart situation, why bother signing them and then playing 16 year olds in front of them? I understand that they might not be ready, but is it a good sign that our home bred 16 year olds are better?

It may just be a story to put in the paper, it may not happen like that.
 

standupforcity

Well-Known Member
Pressley knows what he's doing! What's he ever done to make us think otherwise? Good luck to the lad...I'm sure he's being blooded cos the time is right for him, given the circumstances.
 

Kingokings204

Well-Known Member
So do you really think harewood and king would come in and play how SP wants them to play ???
Can you really see them pressing the opposition defence ???

Yes as they are being paid and both are professionals with a lot of experience. Of course they would. Not saying this 16 year old wouldn't of course he would but quality would lack.
 

LB87ccfc

Member
Yes as they are being paid and both are professionals with a lot of experience. Of course they would. Not saying this 16 year old wouldn't of course he would but quality would lack.


So for example Rooney lacked quality at 16, Harewood and King chasing down, I have heard some things in my life but jeez this one is funny, both lazy as fuck and injury prone...
 

Kingokings204

Well-Known Member
So for example Rooney lacked quality at 16, Harewood and King chasing down, I have heard some things in my life but jeez this one is funny, both lazy as fuck and injury prone...

Rooney is a one off and its just not the same situation. "both lazy as fuck and injury prone" both also quality strikers in their day and a stop gap till the summer than a 16 year old who has never played a minute. OK mate.
 

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
Rooney is a one off and its just not the same situation. "both lazy as fuck and injury prone" both also quality strikers in their day and a stop gap till the summer than a 16 year old who has never played a minute. OK mate.

End of thread. Their day was very short and ended a long long time ago.
 

SkyBlue_Bear83

Well-Known Member
I don't get this Denzel and Urquart situation, why bother signing them and then playing 16 year olds in front of them? I understand that they might not be ready, but is it a good sign that our home bred 16 year olds are better?

I agree, I understand Denzel and Urquart were signed for the development squad but if they can't get in ahead of 16/17 year olds now then it doesn't look good for their future development
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top