Higgs vs CCFC Court Row (15 Viewers)

Forums New posts
sky blue john

sky blue john

Well-Known Member
Sorry to mock but there's a new rumour on GMK that Sandra Garlik and her Sixfields commitee / Posse after several meetings and exstensive research have picked out curtains for the new stadium !
 
sky blue john

sky blue john

Well-Known Member
Breaking news from yesterday for the sixfields posse to get excited about.
" Shock horror a council official may have lied that he had not told Sisu to fuck off yet "
 
sky blue john

sky blue john

Well-Known Member
Rumour has it that the house of lords has been booked as venue for the JR.
Sisu require the extra space for their world record attempt of 1000 lawyers employed for one case !!!
 
Moff

Moff

Well-Known Member
sky blue john said:
Breaking news from yesterday for the sixfields posse to get excited about.
" Shock horror a council official may have lied that he had not told Sisu to fuck off yet "
Click to expand...

John dont give up the day job for a stand up career.

You do know that even the Sixfields posse, like you, also support the club? (before you ask no I have never been)

Anyway I am sure you do know they are fans too, now you just need to up your game a bit for the Britain's Got Talent audition ;)
 
Astute

Astute

Well-Known Member
lordsummerisle said:
If they were that worried about it they would have paid the £29,000 well before it got to court.
Click to expand...

The first day they lost their attempt of getting 290k out of a charity. The second day was trying to get information they can use in the JR. The last day is where things will get difficult for them. So if they think that they will be ordered to pay it why do the third day? Even the costs would be lower unless they think that these costs could be put partly to Higgs and not have to pay them all themselves.
 
hill83

hill83

Well-Known Member
shmmeee said:
Morning all! Ready for another day of arguing over legal details none of us understand?
Click to expand...

I'll be up for it. Not really had a look at this thread yet, but I'll give it a read through and be back to slag a few people off later.

I'll be focussing on: Grammar, overuse of exclamation marks, poor sentence structure and people answering a question with another unrelated question.

I'll let spelling off today as it's a long thread.
 
Last edited:
sky blue john

sky blue john

Well-Known Member
Moff said:
John dont give up the day job for a stand up career.

You do know that even the Sixfields posse, like you, also support the club? (before you ask no I have never been)

Anyway I am sure you do know they are fans too, now you just need to up your game a bit for the Britain's Got Talent audition ;)
Click to expand...

Yes I fully understand Moff.
And I look forward to the day that all ccfc fans are equal again !
I just had a mad hour in response to some of the rubbish on this thread.
It happens to the sanest of us at times.
 
W

wingy

Well-Known Member
hill83 said:
I'll be up for it. Not really had a look at this thread yet, but I'll give it a read through and be back to slag a few people off later.

I'll be focussing on: Grammar, overuse of exclamation marks, poor sentence structure and people answering a question with another unrelated question.

I'll let spelling off today as it's a long thread.
Click to expand...

O oh we're in trouble some ones come along
Gonna bust our bubble.
Hill83 takes the red pen to the "RedEye Thread".:)
 
D

dongonzalos

Well-Known Member
hill83 said:
I'll be up for it. Not really had a look at this thread yet, but I'll give it a read through and be back to slag a few people off later.

I'll be focussing on: Grammar, overuse of exclamation marks, poor sentence structure and people answering a question with another unrelated question.

I'll let spelling off today as it's a long thread.
Click to expand...

epeduba8.jpg
 
James Smith

James Smith

Well-Known Member
Astute said:
I just hope that Fisher is there to get questioned. And if it is OK to question about a balloon being put on a car it should be OK to be questioned about financial matters. Maybe even about the structures of how our club is run. And he won't find it easy to ignore questions or change the subject.
Click to expand...

On that basis you'd have to hope Mr Labovitch would also be questioned.
 
spider_ricoh

spider_ricoh

New Member
Whilst it will be nice to see SISU found against in this case, I do hope that nothing here will help them in the JR i.e. fact learned or the need to raise their game by sacking their legal eagles & replacing them with better ones...

Our only chance for a viable future as a club is to go back to the Ricoh under non-SISU ownership and a CCC win at the JR is the only way to ensure this.
 
torchomatic

torchomatic

Well-Known Member
spider_ricoh said:
Whilst it will be nice to see SISU found against in this case, I do hope that nothing here will help them in the JR i.e. fact learned or the need to raise their game by sacking their legal eagles & replacing them with better ones...

Our only chance for a viable future as a club is to go back to the Ricoh under non-SISU ownership and a CCC win at the JR is the only way to ensure this.
Click to expand...

Even if that did happen then there's no guarantee. There's no way to ensure anything.

Personally I don't care who "wins" as long as we go back to the Ricoh.

Sent from my GT-I9505 using Tapatalk
 
Philosoraptor

Philosoraptor

Well-Known Member
hill83 said:
I'll be up for it. Not really had a look at this thread yet, but I'll give it a read through and be back to slag a few people off later.

I'll be focussing on: Grammar, overuse of exclamation marks, poor sentence structure and people answering a question with another unrelated question.

I'll let spelling off today as it's a long thread.
Click to expand...

let's eat grandma_0.jpg
 
G

Godiva

Well-Known Member
Last edited:
Mary_Mungo_Midge

Mary_Mungo_Midge

Well-Known Member
Grendel said:
Interesting theory but if course a rejection of a voluntary CVA is often a catalyst for a company going into liquidation. Remind me, who rejected it that could influence that decision?
Click to expand...

That's a preposterous insinuation. Given the other parties involved and vested interests in the administration process, liquidation would never have been an output. The CVA was rejected, for reasons discussed before, plus the ambiguities relating to the momevent of assets
 
sky blue john

sky blue john

Well-Known Member
torchomatic said:
Even if that did happen then there's no guarantee. There's no way to ensure anything.

Personally I don't care who "wins" as long as we go back to the Ricoh.

Sent from my GT-I9505 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

So why do you side with Sisu because of whats gone on their tactics. Its impossible for them to achieve a return to the Ricoh ?
 
torchomatic

torchomatic

Well-Known Member
sky blue john said:
So why do you side with Sisu because of whats gone on their tactics. Its impossible for them to achieve a return to the Ricoh ?
Click to expand...

I dont side with sisu I side with ccfc which is why I still watch my team play. I dont side with acl or cc either. Which is why I dont care what thd outcome is as long as we go back. If that means sisu get the Ricoh on the cheap then fine.

Sent from my GT-I9505 using Tapatalk
 
duffer

duffer

Well-Known Member
torchomatic said:
Even if that did happen then there's no guarantee. There's no way to ensure anything.

Personally I don't care who "wins" as long as we go back to the Ricoh.
Click to expand...

Take your point, but from what I've heard so far I still can't really see what the charity have done wrong. On that basis I hope they win, so that they can at least recover their costs.

What really surprises me in all this is how broad the scope of the case is - it's going far beyond the six-week exclusivity period. That's good, imho - it means we're learning a lot more about what's gone on.

I'd like to see someone from SISU on the stand now - will Fisher be called, does anyone know?
 
Last edited:
Grendel

Grendel

Well-Known Member
torchomatic said:
I dont side with sisu I side with ccfc which is why I still watch my team play. I dont side with acl or cc either. Which is why I dont care what thd outcome is as long as we go back. If that means sisu get the Ricoh on the cheap then fine.

Sent from my GT-I9505 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

100% correct. That is all anyone should be interested in.
 
sky blue john

sky blue john

Well-Known Member
torchomatic said:
I dont side with sisu I side with ccfc which is why I still watch my team play. I dont side with acl or cc either. Which is why I dont care what thd outcome is as long as we go back. If that means sisu get the Ricoh on the cheap then fine.

Sent from my GT-I9505 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

Your just helping to prolong our agony because Sisu can't achieve your dream !!
 
Mary_Mungo_Midge

Mary_Mungo_Midge

Well-Known Member
torchomatic said:
I dont side with sisu I side with ccfc which is why I still watch my team play. I dont side with acl or cc either. Which is why I dont care what thd outcome is as long as we go back. If that means sisu get the Ricoh on the cheap then fine.

Sent from my GT-I9505 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

That's an incredibly naive view. How can you not care? Surely now, you can see it's the only ambition of our owners, and the football team you purport to care for is but an expendable pawn in that ambition!?!
 
torchomatic

torchomatic

Well-Known Member
sky blue john said:
Your just helping to prolong our agony because Sisu can't achieve your dream !!
Click to expand...

You blame the fans constantly you're a one trick pony. What you think of me isnt important.

Sent from my GT-I9505 using Tapatalk
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 16 (members: 0, guests: 16)
Top