If this forum had a dis-like button, I am sure this post would set a new record.
But as the Trust hold an open meeting tomorrow I thought I would give the meeting something different to talk about (or not).
I am sure most of you who have trawled through the court transcript have already read the interesting e-mails and either decided that CCC politicians and officers have some explaining to do, and I am sure they will be given every opportunity during the JR.
So this is not another post from me pointing at CCC saying 'they're just as bad, or more, than sisu.
This is about how fragile ACL were when the club was taken over.
From the transcript - Sisu barrister(Q) questioning PWKH(A):
Q. Let's see if we can agree on the
second point, that ACL couldn't afford the Yorkshire Bank loan unless the football club kept paying the rent; would you agree with that?
A. Certainly the sudden cessation of payment from the football club was inevitably going to lead to cash flow
difficulties for ACL.
PWKH is saying that the rent strike would put ACL under considerably pressure. And this is just before the rent strike was initiated. At a point where everyone expected the whole transaction of sisu buying out the Yorkshire Bank loan plus acquiring Higgs shares within a few month. AND during the rent strike ACL would be able to draw on the Escrow account plus receive 10K per game.
Well, if that was the case then surely the cash situation must have been very, very difficult at that time in Spring of 2012.
But what if the club hadn't been bought by sisu? Or bought by somebody insisting on a reduced rent from day one?
Wouldn't that have made it more or less impossible for ACL to survive?
Isn't it somehow possible, that when sisu took over the club on an unchanged rent contract with ACL they not only saved the club, but in fact also saved ACL?
But as the Trust hold an open meeting tomorrow I thought I would give the meeting something different to talk about (or not).
I am sure most of you who have trawled through the court transcript have already read the interesting e-mails and either decided that CCC politicians and officers have some explaining to do, and I am sure they will be given every opportunity during the JR.
So this is not another post from me pointing at CCC saying 'they're just as bad, or more, than sisu.
This is about how fragile ACL were when the club was taken over.
From the transcript - Sisu barrister(Q) questioning PWKH(A):
Q. Let's see if we can agree on the
second point, that ACL couldn't afford the Yorkshire Bank loan unless the football club kept paying the rent; would you agree with that?
A. Certainly the sudden cessation of payment from the football club was inevitably going to lead to cash flow
difficulties for ACL.
PWKH is saying that the rent strike would put ACL under considerably pressure. And this is just before the rent strike was initiated. At a point where everyone expected the whole transaction of sisu buying out the Yorkshire Bank loan plus acquiring Higgs shares within a few month. AND during the rent strike ACL would be able to draw on the Escrow account plus receive 10K per game.
Well, if that was the case then surely the cash situation must have been very, very difficult at that time in Spring of 2012.
But what if the club hadn't been bought by sisu? Or bought by somebody insisting on a reduced rent from day one?
Wouldn't that have made it more or less impossible for ACL to survive?
Isn't it somehow possible, that when sisu took over the club on an unchanged rent contract with ACL they not only saved the club, but in fact also saved ACL?