Why should CCC help? (1 Viewer)

bigfatronssba

Well-Known Member
ccc didn't help ccfc in 2003. That's the real point.

CCFC would have gone out of existence in 2003 if Higgs and CCC didn't go it alone with the Ricoh project.

Something that is conveniently forgotten.
 

stupot07

Well-Known Member
CCFC would have gone out of existence in 2003 if Higgs and CCC didn't go it alone with the Ricoh project.

Something that is conveniently forgotten.

Surely we would have gone into admin, had our debt wiped, bought by a rich Russian Ogliarch and finished the project by ourselves back in 2003.
 

bigfatronssba

Well-Known Member
Utter nonsense. The same logic that is used to justify SISU ironically.

Yes it is the same logic.

It was widely reported at the time that unless CCFC could sell Higgs their share the club would have gone into admin.

Now as McGuinity and Robinson were "the only show in town" at the time, is it not likely that CCFC would have been liquidated?
 
D

Deleted member 5849

Guest
CCFC would have gone out of existence in 2003 if Higgs and CCC didn't go it alone with the Ricoh project.

Something that is conveniently forgotten.

There were other options, it just suited the board at the time to present it as the only option.

And it did get rid of a blot on the landscape in that area of the city.
 

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
Yes it is the same logic.

It was widely reported at the time that unless CCFC could sell Higgs their share the club would have gone into admin.

Now as McGuinity and Robinson were "the only show in town" at the time, is it not likely that CCFC would have been liquidated?

No. It was never in their interest to put the club into administration hence why it never happened prior to then or even after that.
 
D

Deleted member 5849

Guest
Depends what you mean by 'help' anyway.

I do think the modern world boils culture down to economics far too easily. A safe progressive society is one where people share social experiences, and can indulge their heritage and embrace it, that's worth more than money.

The problem is, the clash of cultures that then comes, it isn't CCC that's unique in struggling to adapt to that either. I know, for example, of another council that leaves a building empty for a good half a dozen years because nobody offers the council its 'value'. The problem always comes that the council sees other companies wanting to make money from it, tries to squeeze that margin and take the profit itself (understandably on one level) yet because of budget cuts never has the money to do anything with it themselves.

So it stands empty.

So it depends what you mean by 'help'. I do think there should be room for flexibility and the ability to help, when an entity causes damage when lost. Your list of industrial companies, incidentally, the same applies to them. Some were indeed helped at times, and it was a crying shame when the ability to help them was withdrawn - that's not necessarily a local issue though, more central government and the monetisation of everything.

It would be nice if, in taking a moral highground against an evil investment company, everything wasn't reduced to cold hard cash in return, but the social had a place alongside the economic.

And yes, that applies to more leisure options than CCFC also.
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
It was also hilarious when Jaguar closed Browns Lane wasn't it? Bet you didn't stop laughing for a week>

Unfortunately that private company and all the others listed weren't big enough community assets for our council.
 

Jim

Well-Known Member
Private Limited Company simply means that the shares are not traded publicly ie it is not a floated company or a plc (public limited company).

The ownership of a private company can be by any combination of owners as a result of its incorporation and subsequent equity changes.

A company is publicly owned if it's shares are owned the government or other public body ie Council.

In this case ACL is 50% publicly owned due to the councils 50% of shares.
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
Private Limited Company simply means that the shares are not traded publicly ie it is not a floated company or a plc (public limited company).

The ownership of a private company can be by any combination of owners as a result of its incorporation and subsequent equity changes.

A company is publicly owned if it's shares are owned the government or other public body ie Council.

In this case ACL is 50% publicly owned due to the councils 50% of shares.

Mmmmm interesting stuff. How many directors does ACL have?
 

dongonzalos

Well-Known Member
Please tell me, because I haven't a clue.

Neither have I. Really strange that a lot of people feel like that. They must all be slightly mental. They should only care about their football club, in proxy that includes the owners of the club and back their every decision as that shows you truly support your club.
 
L

limoncello

Guest
Neither have I. Really strange that a lot of people feel like that. They must all be slightly mental. They should only care about their football club, in proxy that includes the owners of the club and back their every decision as that shows you truly support your club.

Glad it's not just me then. The 'majority' are idiots, aren't they, if we're honest? Long live the football club! Fuck the council, fuck Sisu, fuck ACL.
 

bigfatronssba

Well-Known Member
No. It was never in their interest to put the club into administration hence why it never happened prior to then or even after that.

They wouldn't have had a choice.

They had no more money. Do you think businesses only ever go into admin because it suits the owners??

The reason it didn't happen is because they sold their share of the Ricoh.
 

bigfatronssba

Well-Known Member
We are told that the council doesn't want to sell. We are told that the only way CCFC can survive is if they own the Ricoh.

Therefore for CCFC to survive the council has to do something it doesn't want to do.

So the council will have to do something it doesn't want to do in order for a private company to survive.

If that isn't help I don't know what is.

6 pages in, the council haters out in full force, the only one who has attempted to answer the question is Northern Wisdom. Just a barrage of abuse from others who seem incapable of engaging in a structured debate.
 

skybluetony176

Well-Known Member
So if they won't sell and want to charge silly rent with no way for the club to make it's own money, where that leave the club?

You could say the same about Cardoza. In fact when you compare revenue to rent at suxfields he's doing more damage to the club than ACL ever did. Not only that he's extending suxfields using the same mechanism as ACL did for restructuring their lone.

When's sisu going to start giving examples of what clubs with similar crowds (ie non league) pay for rent to negotiate a rent deduction leading to a rent strike, when are the state aid police going to start legal proceedings against NTFC?

Like it keeps getting repeated on this thread "you can't have it both ways".

Forget CCC helping sisu, it's way past time for sisu to start helping CCFC.
 

Hobo

Well-Known Member
So many on here seem to back the council more than the club?

No we do not Nick. We expect SISU who have control of our club to do a better job than they are doing and stop blaming everybody else for the mess they have created.

It is SISU who eroded any trust between themselves and ACL.

It is SISU who has eroded trust with a lot of our supporters.

It is SISU who have to put the wheel back on, nobody else is responsible. If they want the Ricoh then make an offer, if they are going to build a stadium build one. Fans loving or hating the council doesn't come into it.


SISU wanted to break a contract they did it, they have us playing in Northampton, their decision. But then try and claim they were forced to go to Northampton, utter rubbish.

It is all about how SISU conduct their business. If you don't believe me research it.
 

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
They wouldn't have had a choice.

They had no more money. Do you think businesses only ever go into admin because it suits the owners??

The reason it didn't happen is because they sold their share of the Ricoh.

The owners were the major creditors. I'd be interested to see where the sale of half of ACL sits on the club's accounts.
 

Otis

Well-Known Member
Tittle says it all, why should CCC help Otium Entertainment Ltd?

In the past 35 years Coventry has seen Peugeot, Jaguar, Triumph, Massy Ferguson, Rolls Royce, GEC, Courtaulds, and many more other major companies close. CCC did not help any of these as they are private companies and free to do as they wish. These companies provided far more to the city in terms of prestige, jobs, and money than a 3rd Division football club ever will.

Also none of these companies ever (to my knowledge) tied CCC up in an expensive legal battle.

So I'd like to hear the arguments as to why CCC should suddenly help a privately owned company.

After all, we all agree that it would have been better for CCC not to help CCFC back in 2003 don't we?



They shouldn't. They should help Coventry City Football Club. Just so happens Otium are the owners.
 

bigfatronssba

Well-Known Member
The owners were the major creditors. I'd be interested to see where the sale of half of ACL sits on the club's accounts.

Hmrc and Co op bank were also major creditors.

The accounts were a mess apparently so seeing that won't help.
 

Hobo

Well-Known Member
Most people don't give a shit about a hedge fund do they? I haven't seen anybody say I hope sisu make loads of money?

How are they going to fund us then Nick?
 

bigfatronssba

Well-Known Member
They shouldn't. They should help Coventry City Football Club. Just so happens Otium are the owners.

Otium are Coventry City.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top